These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24730651)

  • 41. Effects of in vitro cyclic dislodging on retentive force and removal torque of three overdenture attachment systems.
    Kobayashi M; Srinivasan M; Ammann P; Perriard J; Ohkubo C; Müller F; Belser UC; Schimmel M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 23566266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Mandibular overdentures retained by two implants: 10-year results from a crossover clinical trial comparing ball-socket and bar-clip attachments.
    Cune M; Burgers M; van Kampen F; de Putter C; van der Bilt A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 20617218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers.
    Akça K; Akkocaoglu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 17340903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of Distal Implant Inclination on Dislodging Forces of Different Locator Attachments Used for Mandibular Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    ELsyad MA; Emera RM; Ashmawy TM
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e666-e674. PubMed ID: 29143403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Retention force and deformation of an innovative attachment model for mini-implant-retained overdentures.
    Valente MLC; Shimano MVW; Agnelli JAM; Dos Reis AC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):129-134. PubMed ID: 29961625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Number and Location of Mini-Implants Retaining a Mandibular Overdenture to Resist Lateral Forces: A Preliminary In Vitro Study.
    Takagaki K; Gonda T; Maeda Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(3):248–250. PubMed ID: 28319215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. In vitro assessment of mandibular single/two implant-retained overdentures using stress-breaking attachments.
    Kono K; Kurihara D; Suzuki Y; Ohkubo C
    Implant Dent; 2014 Aug; 23(4):456-62. PubMed ID: 25033343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Peri-implant strain around mesially inclined two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures with Locator attachments.
    Elsyad MA; Eltowery SM; Gebreel AA
    J Oral Sci; 2017 Dec; 59(4):483-490. PubMed ID: 29093282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Influence of Rigid Bar and Nonrigid Double Crown Attachments on Maxillary Implant Overdentures: An In Vitro Study with Differential Bone Quality.
    Kimura T; Yang TC; Maeda Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):764-769. PubMed ID: 30024991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effects of Low-Profile Stud Attachment Configurations on Stress Distribution Characteristics of Implant-Retained Overdentures.
    Tokar E; Uludag B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):754-763. PubMed ID: 30024990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs.
    Ochiai KT; Williams BH; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 15153848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Mandibular implant-supported overdenture: an in vitro comparison of ball, bar, and magnetic attachments.
    Manju V; Sreelal T
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Jun; 39(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 22891704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of attachment type on the mobility of implant-stabilized overdentures--an in vitro study.
    Setz JM; Wright PS; Ferman AM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(6):494-9. PubMed ID: 11203675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
    Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. New mini dental implant attachments versus O-ring attachment after cyclic aging: Analysis of retention strength and gap space.
    Fatalla AA; Song K; Cao YG
    J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2017 Jun; 37(3):419-424. PubMed ID: 28585142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effect of maximum bite force on marginal bone loss of mini-implants supporting a mandibular overdenture: a randomized controlled trial.
    Jofré J; Hamada T; Nishimura M; Klattenhoff C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):243-9. PubMed ID: 20070758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Midline denture base strains of glass fiber-reinforced single implant-supported overdentures.
    Gibreel M; Lassila LVJ; Närhi TO; Perea-Lowery L; Vallittu PK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):407-412. PubMed ID: 32958304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Photoelastic stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures.
    Kenney R; Richards MW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Nov; 80(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 9813806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.