These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24730739)

  • 1. Role of attentional tags in working memory-driven attentional capture.
    Kuo CY; Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1301-7. PubMed ID: 24730739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Working memory distortions of duration perception are modulated by attentional tags.
    Pan Y; Hou X
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Mar; 165():48-52. PubMed ID: 26922616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of load on the guidance of visual attention from working memory.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Huang S; Kong L; Wang S
    Vision Res; 2011 Dec; 51(23-24):2356-61. PubMed ID: 21964327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guidance of visual attention from working memory contents depends on stimulus attributes.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Kong L; Huang S; Yue Z; Wang S
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Dec; 486(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 20884328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Components of working memory and visual selective attention.
    Burnham BR; Sabia M; Langan C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):391-403. PubMed ID: 23875574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Working memory contents revive the neglected, but suppress the inhibited.
    Han SW
    Cognition; 2015 Dec; 145():116-21. PubMed ID: 26355831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The modulation of perceptual selection by working memory is dependent on the focus of spatial attention.
    Pan Y; Soto D
    Vision Res; 2010 Jul; 50(15):1437-44. PubMed ID: 19883679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Opposing effects of memory-driven and stimulus-driven attention on distractor perception.
    Han SW
    Cogn Process; 2018 Feb; 19(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 28871460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory.
    Hollingworth A; Beck VM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):911-7. PubMed ID: 27123681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention?
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1450-64. PubMed ID: 24730738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Executive and perceptual distraction in visual working memory.
    Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1677-1693. PubMed ID: 28414499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distractor probability changes the shape of the attentional template.
    Geng JJ; DiQuattro NE; Helm J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1993-2007. PubMed ID: 28425732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Behavioral decoding of working memory items inside and outside the focus of attention.
    Mallett R; Lewis-Peacock JA
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Jul; 1424(1):256-267. PubMed ID: 29604084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual differences in working memory capacity predict learned control over attentional capture.
    Robison MK; Unsworth N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1912-1924. PubMed ID: 28406685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semantically congruent bimodal presentation modulates cognitive control over attentional guidance by working memory.
    Cai B; Tang X; Wang A; Zhang M
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Jul; 52(5):1065-1078. PubMed ID: 38308161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Opposite effects of capacity load and resolution load on distractor processing.
    Zhang W; Luck SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 25365573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pop-out and pop-in: Visual working memory advantages for unique items.
    Rajsic J; Sun SZ; Huxtable L; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1787-1793. PubMed ID: 27025501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decoding working memory content from attentional biases.
    Dowd EW; Pearson JM; Egner T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1252-1260. PubMed ID: 28155212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A role for spatial and nonspatial working memory processes in visual search.
    Anderson EJ; Mannan SK; Rees G; Sumner P; Kennard C
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(5):301-12. PubMed ID: 25116297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.