These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24730745)

  • 1. The same-location cost is unrelated to attentional settings: an object-updating account.
    Carmel T; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1465-78. PubMed ID: 24730745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of conscious perception in attentional capture and object-file updating.
    Lamy D; Alon L; Carmel T; Shalev N
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Jan; 26(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 25413876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Same-location costs in peripheral cueing: The role of cue awareness and feature changes.
    Schoeberl T; Ditye T; Ansorge U
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):433-451. PubMed ID: 28816482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture.
    Bertleff S; Fink GR; Weidner R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 28(8):1152-65. PubMed ID: 27054402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture.
    Anderson BA; Folk CL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1183-98. PubMed ID: 22673857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attentional control settings prevent abrupt onsets from capturing visual spatial attention.
    Al-Aidroos N; Harrison S; Pratt J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 19728228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tracking the location of visuospatial attention in a contingent capture paradigm.
    Leblanc E; Prime DJ; Jolicoeur P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 20(4):657-71. PubMed ID: 18052780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contingent capture effects in temporal order judgments.
    Born S; Kerzel D; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):995-1006. PubMed ID: 25938252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Jannati A; Gaspar JM; McDonald JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1713-30. PubMed ID: 23527999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of display-to-display feature changes on net cueing effects: Evidence for a contribution of object-file updating.
    Schoeberl T; Goller F; Ansorge U
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Jun; 73(6):908-919. PubMed ID: 31931666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The typical advantage of object-based attention reflects reduced spatial cost.
    Yeshurun Y; Rashal E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jan; 43(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 27808545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Salience determines attentional orienting in visual selection.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1051-1057. PubMed ID: 32757594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 29309194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Much ado about nothing: Capturing attention toward locations without new perceptual events.
    Hilchey MD; Taylor JE; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1923-1927. PubMed ID: 27854455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Suppression of overt attentional capture by salient-but-irrelevant color singletons.
    Gaspelin N; Leonard CJ; Luck SJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):45-62. PubMed ID: 27804032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The perceptual enhancement by spatial attention is impaired during the attentional blink.
    Bae E; Jung S; Han SW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():150-158. PubMed ID: 30119048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of relational information in contingent capture.
    Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1460-76. PubMed ID: 20919781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Irrelevant singletons in pop-out search: attentional capture or filtering costs?
    Becker SI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):764-87. PubMed ID: 17683227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The spatial dynamics of mouse-tracking reveal that attention capture is stimulus-driven rather than contingent upon top-down goals.
    Dieciuc MA; Roque NA; Boot WR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1285-1290. PubMed ID: 31259583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Top-down directed attention to stimulus features and attentional allocation to bottom-up deviations.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):4.1-8. PubMed ID: 19146288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.