419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24731155)
1. Evaluating the performance of copula models in phase I-II clinical trials under model misspecification.
Cunanan K; Koopmeiners JS
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Apr; 14():51. PubMed ID: 24731155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Bayesian adaptive Phase I-II clinical trial for evaluating efficacy and toxicity with delayed outcomes.
Koopmeiners JS; Modiano J
Clin Trials; 2014 Feb; 11(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 24082004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A trivariate continual reassessment method for phase I/II trials of toxicity, efficacy, and surrogate efficacy.
Zhong W; Koopmeiners JS; Carlin BP
Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(29):3885-95. PubMed ID: 22807126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The 3 + 3 design in dose-finding studies with small sample sizes: Pitfalls and possible remedies.
Chiuzan C; Dehbi HM
Clin Trials; 2024 Jun; 21(3):350-357. PubMed ID: 38618916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flexible use of copula-type model for dose-finding in drug combination clinical trials.
Hashizume K; Tshuchida J; Sozu T
Biometrics; 2022 Dec; 78(4):1651-1661. PubMed ID: 34181760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phase I/II dose-finding design for molecularly targeted agent: Plateau determination using adaptive randomization.
Riviere MK; Yuan Y; Jourdan JH; Dubois F; Zohar S
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):466-479. PubMed ID: 26988926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Bayesian dose-finding design for phase I/II clinical trials with nonignorable dropouts.
Guo B; Yuan Y
Stat Med; 2015 May; 34(10):1721-32. PubMed ID: 25626676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An adaptive multi-stage phase I dose-finding design incorporating continuous efficacy and toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.
Du Y; Yin J; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar SJ
J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):271-286. PubMed ID: 30403559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Escalation with overdose control using all toxicities and time to event toxicity data in cancer Phase I clinical trials.
Chen Z; Cui Y; Owonikoko TK; Wang Z; Li Z; Luo R; Kutner M; Khuri FR; Kowalski J
Contemp Clin Trials; 2014 Mar; 37(2):322-32. PubMed ID: 24530487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of model choices for the Continual Reassessment Method in phase I cancer trials.
Paoletti X; Kramar A
Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):3012-28. PubMed ID: 19672839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. STEIN: A simple toxicity and efficacy interval design for seamless phase I/II clinical trials.
Lin R; Yin G
Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(26):4106-4120. PubMed ID: 28786138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A utility-based Bayesian optimal interval (U-BOIN) phase I/II design to identify the optimal biological dose for targeted and immune therapies.
Zhou Y; Lee JJ; Yuan Y
Stat Med; 2019 Dec; 38(28):5299-5316. PubMed ID: 31621952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Bayesian adaptive design for cancer phase I trials using a flexible range of doses.
Tighiouart M; Cook-Wiens G; Rogatko A
J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(3):562-574. PubMed ID: 28858566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Bayesian adaptive design for estimating the maximum tolerated dose curve using drug combinations in cancer phase I clinical trials.
Tighiouart M; Li Q; Rogatko A
Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):280-290. PubMed ID: 27060889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sequential or combined designs for Phase I/II clinical trials? A simulation study.
Rossoni C; Bardet A; Geoerger B; Paoletti X
Clin Trials; 2019 Dec; 16(6):635-644. PubMed ID: 31538815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian dose-finding designs for combination of molecularly targeted agents assuming partial stochastic ordering.
Guo B; Li Y
Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):859-75. PubMed ID: 25413162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Flexible Bayesian methods for cancer phase I clinical trials. Dose escalation with overdose control.
Tighiouart M; Rogatko A; Babb JS
Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(14):2183-96. PubMed ID: 15909291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. TITE-BOIN-ET: Time-to-event Bayesian optimal interval design to accelerate dose-finding based on both efficacy and toxicity outcomes.
Takeda K; Morita S; Taguri M
Pharm Stat; 2020 May; 19(3):335-349. PubMed ID: 31829517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian designs of phase II oncology trials to select maximum effective dose assuming monotonic dose-response relationship.
Guo B; Li Y
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jul; 14():95. PubMed ID: 25074481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose escalation with overdose control using a quasi-continuous toxicity score in cancer Phase I clinical trials.
Chen Z; Tighiouart M; Kowalski J
Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Sep; 33(5):949-58. PubMed ID: 22561391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
