194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24731936)
1. Responses of soil microbial community to different concentration of fomesafen.
Wu X; Xu J; Dong F; Liu X; Zheng Y
J Hazard Mater; 2014 May; 273():155-64. PubMed ID: 24731936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of fomesafen on the soil microbial communities in soybean fields in Northeastern China.
Wu XH; Zhang Y; Du PQ; Xu J; Dong FS; Liu XG; Zheng YQ
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2018 Feb; 148():169-176. PubMed ID: 29054028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of repeated applications of chlorimuron-ethyl on the soil microbial biomass, activity and microbial community in the greenhouse.
Xu J; Zhang Y; Dong F; Liu X; Wu X; Zheng Y
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2014 Feb; 92(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 24264144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Response of microbial community to a new fungicide fluopyram in the silty-loam agricultural soil.
Zhang Y; Xu J; Dong F; Liu X; Wu X; Zheng Y
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2014 Oct; 108():273-80. PubMed ID: 25105487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of imazethapyr on the microbial community structure in agricultural soils.
Zhang C; Xu J; Liu X; Dong F; Kong Z; Sheng Y; Zheng Y
Chemosphere; 2010 Oct; 81(6):800-6. PubMed ID: 20659755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of fomesafen on soil enzyme activity, microbial population, and bacterial community composition.
Zhang Q; Zhu L; Wang J; Xie H; Wang J; Wang F; Sun F
Environ Monit Assess; 2014 May; 186(5):2801-12. PubMed ID: 24362514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Response of the soil microbial community to imazethapyr application in a soybean field.
Xu J; Guo L; Dong F; Liu X; Wu X; Sheng Y; Zhang Y; Zheng Y
J Environ Sci Health B; 2013; 48(6):505-11. PubMed ID: 23452216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Soil-applied biochar increases microbial diversity and wheat plant performance under herbicide fomesafen stress.
Meng L; Sun T; Li M; Saleem M; Zhang Q; Wang C
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Apr; 171():75-83. PubMed ID: 30597319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of triclosan on microbial community structure in three soils.
Butler E; Whelan MJ; Ritz K; Sakrabani R; van Egmond R
Chemosphere; 2012 Sep; 89(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 22551872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of copper on phospholipid fatty acid composition of microbial communities in two red soils.
Yao HY; Liu YY; Xue D; Huang CY
J Environ Sci (China); 2006; 18(3):503-9. PubMed ID: 17294647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microbial response to heavy metal-polluted soils: community analysis from phospholipid-linked fatty acids and ester-linked fatty acids extracts.
Hinojosa MB; Carreira JA; García-Ruíz R; Dick RP
J Environ Qual; 2005; 34(5):1789-800. PubMed ID: 16151231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single-walled carbon nanotubes alter soil microbial community composition.
Jin L; Son Y; DeForest JL; Kang YJ; Kim W; Chung H
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jan; 466-467():533-8. PubMed ID: 23933455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fomesafen impacts bacterial communities and enzyme activities in the rhizosphere.
Hu H; Zhou H; Zhou S; Li Z; Wei C; Yu Y; Hay AG
Environ Pollut; 2019 Oct; 253():302-311. PubMed ID: 31323613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Glyphosate application increased catabolic activity of gram-negative bacteria but impaired soil fungal community.
Liu Y; Li Y; Hua X; Müller K; Wang H; Yang T; Wang Q; Peng X; Wang M; Pang Y; Qi J; Yang Y
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 May; 25(15):14762-14772. PubMed ID: 29541980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microbial community structure in a silty clay loam soil after fumigation with three broad spectrum fungicides.
Podio NS; Guzmán CA; Meriles JM
J Environ Sci Health B; 2008 May; 43(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 18437621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of application of corn straw on soil microbial community structure during the maize growing season.
Lu P; Lin YH; Yang ZQ; Xu YP; Tan F; Jia XD; Wang M; Xu DR; Wang XZ
J Basic Microbiol; 2015 Jan; 55(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 24652702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Microbial activity and community structure analysis under the different land use patterns in farmland soils: based on the methods PLFA and MicroResp].
Chen XJ; Wu XH; Liu SL; Yuan HZ; Li MM; Zhu HH; Ge TD; Tong CL; Wu JS
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2013 Jun; 34(6):2375-82. PubMed ID: 23947059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sheep-urine-induced changes in soil microbial community structure.
Nunan N; Singh B; Reid E; Ord B; Papert A; Squires J; Prosser JI; Wheatley RE; McNicol J; Millard P
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2006 May; 56(2):310-20. PubMed ID: 16629760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Characteristics of soil microbial biomass and community composition in three types of plantations in southern subtropical area of China].
Wang WX; Shi ZM; Luo D; Liu SR; Lu LH
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2013 Jul; 24(7):1784-92. PubMed ID: 24175505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Structure and function of rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soil microbial community respond differently to elevated ozone in field-planted wheat.
Chen Z; Wang X; Shang H
J Environ Sci (China); 2015 Jun; 32():126-34. PubMed ID: 26040739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
