191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24732851)
1. Transverse process hooks at upper instrumented vertebra provide more gradual motion transition than pedicle screws.
Thawrani DP; Glos DL; Coombs MT; Bylski-Austrow DI; Sturm PF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jun; 39(14):E826-32. PubMed ID: 24732851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of posterior polyester tethers on the biomechanics of proximal junctional kyphosis: a finite element analysis.
Bess S; Harris JE; Turner AW; LaFage V; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Schwab FJ; Haid RW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jan; 26(1):125-133. PubMed ID: 27611508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws.
Kuklo TR; Dmitriev AE; Cardoso MJ; Lehman RA; Erickson M; Gill NW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):E482-7. PubMed ID: 18594445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinically relevant biomechanical properties of three different fixation techniques of the upper instrumented vertebra in deformity surgery.
Nevzati E; Moser M; Dietz N; Yaszay B; Lenke LG; Farshad M; Arvind V; Cho SK; Spiessberger A
Spine Deform; 2022 Sep; 10(5):1017-1027. PubMed ID: 35428950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is a gradual reduction of stiffness on top of posterior instrumentation possible with a suitable proximal implant? A biomechanical study.
Lange T; Schmoelz W; Gosheger G; Eichinger M; Heinrichs CH; Boevingloh AS; Schulte TL
Spine J; 2017 Aug; 17(8):1148-1155. PubMed ID: 28373080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. T9 versus T10 as the upper instrumented vertebra for correction of adult deformity-rationale and recommendations.
Hey HWD; Tan KA; Neo CS; Lau ET; Choong DA; Lau LL; Liu GK; Wong HK
Spine J; 2017 May; 17(5):615-621. PubMed ID: 27856380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hooks Versus Pedicle Screws at the Upper Instrumented Level: An In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison.
Colantonio DF; Le AH; Pisano AJ; Chung JM; Wagner SC; Fredericks DR; Roach WB; Schlaff C; Dill A; Mauntel TC; Hendershot BD; Helgeson MD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Apr; 48(7):E94-E100. PubMed ID: 36745404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical comparison of semirigid junctional fixation techniques to prevent proximal junctional failure after thoracolumbar adult spinal deformity correction.
Doodkorte RJP; Roth AK; Arts JJ; Lataster LMA; van Rhijn LW; Willems PC
Spine J; 2021 May; 21(5):855-864. PubMed ID: 33493681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prevention of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis: Are Polyaxial Pedicle Screws Superior to Monoaxial Pedicle Screws at the Upper Instrumented Vertebrae?
Wang H; Ding W; Ma L; Zhang L; Yang D
World Neurosurg; 2017 May; 101():405-415. PubMed ID: 28216210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical assessment of the stabilization capacity of monolithic spinal rods with different flexural stiffness and anchoring arrangement.
Facchinello Y; Brailovski V; Petit Y; Brummund M; Tremblay J; Mac-Thiong JM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Dec; 30(10):1026-35. PubMed ID: 26421654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of translaminar versus pedicle screws at T1 and T2 in long subaxial cervical constructs.
McGirt MJ; Sutter EG; Xu R; Sciubba DM; Wolinsky JP; Witham TF; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A
Neurosurgery; 2009 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):167-72; discussion 172. PubMed ID: 19934991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical assessment of proximal junctional semi-rigid fixation in long-segment thoracolumbar constructs.
Viswanathan VK; Ganguly R; Minnema AJ; DeVries Watson NA; Grosland NM; Fredericks DC; Grossbach AJ; Viljoen SV; Farhadi HF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):184-192. PubMed ID: 30497219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short Segment Spinal Instrumentation With Index Vertebra Pedicle Screw Placement for Pathologies Involving the Anterior and Middle Vertebral Column Is as Effective as Long Segment Stabilization With Cage Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study.
Bartanusz V; Harris J; Moldavsky M; Cai Y; Bucklen B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Nov; 40(22):1729-36. PubMed ID: 26536447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of posterior thoracic spine anatomical structures on motion segment flexion stiffness.
Anderson AL; McIff TE; Asher MA; Burton DC; Glattes RC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Mar; 34(5):441-6. PubMed ID: 19247164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical stability of transverse connectors in the setting of a thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy.
Lehman RA; Kang DG; Wagner SC; Paik H; Cardoso MJ; Bernstock JD; Dmitriev AE
Spine J; 2015 Jul; 15(7):1629-35. PubMed ID: 25771755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical analysis of four- versus six-screw constructs for short-segment pedicle screw and rod instrumentation of unstable thoracolumbar fractures.
Norton RP; Milne EL; Kaimrajh DN; Eismont FJ; Latta LL; Williams SK
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1734-9. PubMed ID: 24462814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The potential of proximal junctional kyphosis prevention using a novel tether pedicle screw construct: an in silico study comparing the influence of standard and dynamic techniques on adjacent-level range of motion and load pattern.
Decker S; Koller H; Overes T; Montali A; Clin J; Hachem B
J Neurosurg Spine; 2024 May; 40(5):611-621. PubMed ID: 38394650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A biomechanical assessment of infra-laminar hooks as an alternative to supra-laminar hooks in thoracolumbar fixation.
Murakami H; Tsai KJ; Attallah-Wasif ES; Yamazaki K; Shimamura T; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):967-71. PubMed ID: 16641771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Properties of an interspinous fixation device (ISD) in lumbar fusion constructs: a biomechanical study.
Techy F; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):572-9. PubMed ID: 23498926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical analysis of a novel posterior construct in a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion model an in vitro study.
Sethi A; Muzumdar AM; Ingalhalikar A; Vaidya R
Spine J; 2011 Sep; 11(9):863-9. PubMed ID: 21802998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
