120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24733002)
1. Preoperative T staging of gastric cancer: comparison of diffusion- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
Liu S; He J; Guan W; Li Q; Zhang X; Mao H; Yu H; Zhou Z
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(4):544-50. PubMed ID: 24733002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Added value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging to T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in T staging of gastric cancer.
Liu S; He J; Guan W; Li Q; Yu H; Zhou Z; Bao S; Zhou Z
Clin Imaging; 2014; 38(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 24411204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Urinary bladder cancer: diffusion-weighted MR imaging--accuracy for diagnosing T stage and estimating histologic grade.
Takeuchi M; Sasaki S; Ito M; Okada S; Takahashi S; Kawai T; Suzuki K; Oshima H; Hara M; Shibamoto Y
Radiology; 2009 Apr; 251(1):112-21. PubMed ID: 19332849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Locally advanced rectal cancer: added value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for predicting tumor clearance of the mesorectal fascia after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy.
Park MJ; Kim SH; Lee SJ; Jang KM; Rhim H
Radiology; 2011 Sep; 260(3):771-80. PubMed ID: 21846762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. T staging of rectal cancer: accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging compared with T2-weighted imaging on 3.0 tesla MRI.
Feng Q; Yan YQ; Zhu J; Xu JR
J Dig Dis; 2014 Apr; 15(4):188-94. PubMed ID: 24373561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of depth of myometrial invasion and overall staging in endometrial cancer: comparison of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Beddy P; Moyle P; Kataoka M; Yamamoto AK; Joubert I; Lomas D; Crawford R; Sala E
Radiology; 2012 Feb; 262(2):530-7. PubMed ID: 22114239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted 3.0-T MR imaging--initial experience.
Lin G; Ng KK; Chang CJ; Wang JJ; Ho KC; Yen TC; Wu TI; Wang CC; Chen YR; Huang YT; Ng SH; Jung SM; Chang TC; Lai CH
Radiology; 2009 Mar; 250(3):784-92. PubMed ID: 19244045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diffusion-weighted MRI: role in detecting abdominopelvic internal fistulas and sinus tracts.
Schmid-Tannwald C; Agrawal G; Dahi F; Sethi I; Oto A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jan; 35(1):125-31. PubMed ID: 21953793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endometrial cancer: preoperative staging using three-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin-echo and diffusion-weighted MR imaging at 3.0 T: a prospective comparative study.
Hori M; Kim T; Onishi H; Imaoka I; Kagawa Y; Murakami T; Nakamoto A; Ueguchi T; Tatsumi M; Enomoto T; Kimura T; Tomiyama N
Eur Radiol; 2013 Aug; 23(8):2296-305. PubMed ID: 23508278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the potential of diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer detection.
Morgan VA; Kyriazi S; Ashley SE; DeSouza NM
Acta Radiol; 2007 Jul; 48(6):695-703. PubMed ID: 17611881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate cancer detection with 3-T MRI: comparison of diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted imaging.
Miao H; Fukatsu H; Ishigaki T
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Feb; 61(2):297-302. PubMed ID: 17085002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in follow-up of superficial urinary bladder carcinoma after transurethral resection: initial experience.
El-Assmy A; Abou-El-Ghar ME; Refaie HF; Mosbah A; El-Diasty T
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E622-7. PubMed ID: 22757606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical value of T2-weighted imaging combined with diffusion-weighted imaging in preoperative T staging of urinary bladder cancer: a large-scale, multiobserver prospective study on 3.0-T MRI.
Wu LM; Chen XX; Xu JR; Zhang XF; Suo ST; Yao QY; Fan Y; Hu J
Acad Radiol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):939-46. PubMed ID: 23746384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective comparison of 3T MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging and MDCT for the preoperative TNM staging of gastric cancer.
Joo I; Lee JM; Kim JH; Shin CI; Han JK; Choi BI
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Mar; 41(3):814-21. PubMed ID: 24677322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rectal cancer: comparison of accuracy of local-regional staging with two- and three-dimensional preoperative 3-T MR imaging.
Kim H; Lim JS; Choi JY; Park J; Chung YE; Kim MJ; Choi E; Kim NK; Kim KW
Radiology; 2010 Feb; 254(2):485-92. PubMed ID: 20093520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of prostate cancer with magnetic resonance imaging: optimization of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, dynamic-enhanced T1-weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging apparent diffusion coefficient mapping sequences and MR spectroscopy, correlated with biopsy and histopathological findings.
Aydin H; Kizilgöz V; Tatar IG; Damar C; Ugan AR; Paker I; Hekimoğlu B
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 22261768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative T staging of urinary bladder cancer: does diffusion-weighted MRI have supplementary value?
Watanabe H; Kanematsu M; Kondo H; Goshima S; Tsuge Y; Onozuka M; Moriyama N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 May; 192(5):1361-6. PubMed ID: 19380561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of international federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IB cervical cancer: comparison of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T.
Lin Y; Chen Z; Kuang F; Li H; Zhong Q; Ma M
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):989-94. PubMed ID: 24270123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transition zone prostate cancer: detection and localization with 3-T multiparametric MR imaging.
Hoeks CM; Hambrock T; Yakar D; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Feuth T; Witjes JA; Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):207-17. PubMed ID: 23143029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gastric cancer: The role of diffusion weighted imaging in the preoperative staging.
Caivano R; Rabasco P; Lotumolo A; D' Antuono F; Zandolino A; Villonio A; Macarini L; Guglielmi G; Salvatore M; Cammarota A
Cancer Invest; 2014 Jun; 32(5):184-90. PubMed ID: 24654696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
