These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24733363)

  • 1. Incidental encoding of enclosure geometry does not require visual input: evidence from blindfolded adults.
    Sturz BR; Gaskin KA; Roberts JE
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):935-42. PubMed ID: 24733363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. More than a feeling: incidental learning of array geometry by blindfolded adult humans revealed through touch.
    Sturz BR; Green ML; Gaskin KA; Evans AC; Graves AA; Roberts JE
    J Exp Biol; 2013 Feb; 216(Pt 4):587-93. PubMed ID: 23125340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Size does not matter, but features do: Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana) weigh features more heavily than geometry in large and small enclosures.
    Lambinet V; Wilzeck C; Kelly DM
    Behav Processes; 2014 Feb; 102():3-11. PubMed ID: 24378211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial encoding in mountain chickadees: features overshadow geometry.
    Gray ER; Bloomfield LL; Ferrey A; Spetch ML; Sturdy CB
    Biol Lett; 2005 Sep; 1(3):314-7. PubMed ID: 17148196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rats' use of geometric, featural and orientation cues to locate a hidden goal.
    Batty ER; Hoban L; Spetch ML; Dickson CT
    Behav Processes; 2009 Nov; 82(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 19683037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial reorientation: the effects of space size on the encoding of landmark and geometry information.
    Chiandetti C; Regolin L; Sovrano VA; Vallortigara G
    Anim Cogn; 2007 Apr; 10(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 17136416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial reorientation by geometry in bumblebees.
    Sovrano VA; Rigosi E; Vallortigara G
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e37449. PubMed ID: 22624033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Encoding of relative enclosure size in a dynamic three-dimensional virtual environment by humans.
    Sturz BR; Kelly DM
    Behav Processes; 2009 Oct; 82(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 19576273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What is geometric information and how do animals use it?
    Sutton JE
    Behav Processes; 2009 Mar; 80(3):339-43. PubMed ID: 19084055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple landmarks, the encoding of environmental geometry and the spatial logics of a dual brain.
    Chiesa AD; Pecchia T; Tommasi L; Vallortigara G
    Anim Cogn; 2006 Oct; 9(4):281-93. PubMed ID: 16941155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Features enhance the encoding of geometry.
    Kelly DM
    Anim Cogn; 2010 May; 13(3):453-62. PubMed ID: 20012120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pigeons encode relative geometry.
    Kelly DM; Spetch ML
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2001 Oct; 27(4):417-22. PubMed ID: 11676090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experience and geometry: controlled-rearing studies with chicks.
    Chiandetti C; Vallortigara G
    Anim Cogn; 2010 May; 13(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 19960217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reorienting in virtual 3D environments: do adult humans use principal axes, medial axes or local geometry?
    Ambosta AH; Reichert JF; Kelly DM
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e78985. PubMed ID: 24223869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Orientation in trapezoid-shaped enclosures: implications for theoretical accounts of geometry learning.
    Sturz BR; Gurley T; Bodily KD
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 21319918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of local and global geometry from object arrays by adult humans.
    Reichert JF; Kelly DM
    Behav Processes; 2011 Feb; 86(2):196-205. PubMed ID: 21144887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reorienting strategies in a rectangular array of landmarks by domestic chicks (Gallus gallus).
    Pecchia T; Vallortigara G
    J Comp Psychol; 2010 May; 124(2):147-58. PubMed ID: 20476814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enclosure size and the use of local and global geometric cues for reorientation.
    Sturz BR; Forloines MR; Bodily KD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Apr; 19(2):270-6. PubMed ID: 22218783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental scaling influences the use of local but not global geometric cues during spatial reorientation.
    Sturz BR; Bell ZK; Bodily KD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1159-1166. PubMed ID: 29239623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Geometric cues influence head direction cells only weakly in nondisoriented rats.
    Knight R; Hayman R; Lin Ginzberg L; Jeffery K
    J Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 31(44):15681-92. PubMed ID: 22049411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.