403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24736022)
1. The feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after robotic-assisted hysterectomy alone or with other procedures for benign and malignant indications.
Lee SJ; Calderon B; Gardner GJ; Mays A; Nolan S; Sonoda Y; Barakat RR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jun; 133(3):552-5. PubMed ID: 24736022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Same-day discharge in clinical stage I endometrial cancer patients treated with total laparoscopic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Rettenmaier MA; Mendivil AA; Brown JV; Abaid LN; Micha JP; Goldstein BH
Oncology; 2012; 82(6):321-6. PubMed ID: 22572861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology.
Lambaudie E; Houvenaeghel G; Walz J; Bannier M; Buttarelli M; Gurriet B; De Laparrent T; Blache JL
Surg Endosc; 2008 Dec; 22(12):2743-7. PubMed ID: 18814002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report.
Fader AN; Escobar PF
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 19481243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors of 30-day readmission and impact of same-day discharge in laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Jennings AJ; Spencer RJ; Medlin E; Rice LW; Uppal S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Sep; 213(3):344.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25981843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Postoperative pain medication requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted (“Robotic”) and standard laparoscopic procedures for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer.
Leitao MM; Malhotra V; Briscoe G; Suidan R; Dholakiya P; Santos K; Jewell EL; Brown CL; Sonoda Y; Abu-Rustum NR; Barakat RR; Gardner GJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(11):3561-7. PubMed ID: 23797751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Standardized technique of laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancer optimizes the perioperative outcomes.
Kavallaris A; Kalogiannidis I; Chalvatzas N; Hornemann A; Bohlmann MK; Diedrich K
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jun; 283(6):1373-80. PubMed ID: 20607263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic high para-aortic lymph node dissection with high port placement using same port for pelvic surgery in gynecologic cancer patients.
Kim TJ; Yoon G; Lee YY; Choi CH; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Jul; 26(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 26197858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. TELELAP ALF-X Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Feasibility and Perioperative Outcomes.
Fanfani F; Restaino S; Gueli Alletti S; Fagotti A; Monterossi G; Rossitto C; Costantini B; Scambia G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1011-7. PubMed ID: 25982854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic surgery in complicated gynecologic diseases: experience of Tri-Service General Hospital in Taiwan.
Tan SJ; Lin CK; Fu PT; Liu YL; Sun CC; Chang CC; Yu MH; Lai HC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 51(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 22482963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Promoting Same-Day Discharge for Gynecologic Oncology Patients in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.
Fountain CR; Havrilesky LJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):932-939. PubMed ID: 28501452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors in the feasibility and safety of outpatient robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial or cervical carcinoma.
Matern T; Kang E; Lim PC
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 May; 157(2):482-486. PubMed ID: 32008793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The value of laparoscopic surgery to stage gynecological cancers: present and future.
Mettler L; Meinhold-Heerlein I
Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Aug; 61(4):319-37. PubMed ID: 19745797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
