608 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24736186)
1. Visual, auditory and tactile stimuli compete for early sensory processing capacities within but not between senses.
Porcu E; Keitel C; Müller MM
Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 97():224-35. PubMed ID: 24736186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Crossmodal and intermodal attention modulate event-related brain potentials to tactile and auditory stimuli.
Hötting K; Rösler F; Röder B
Exp Brain Res; 2003 Jan; 148(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 12478394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Steady state responses to temporally congruent and incongruent auditory and vibrotactile amplitude modulated stimulation.
Budd TW; Timora JR
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):419-32. PubMed ID: 23769951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early visual and auditory processing rely on modality-specific attentional resources.
Keitel C; Maess B; Schröger E; Müller MM
Neuroimage; 2013 Apr; 70():240-9. PubMed ID: 23287527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mutual influences of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion and auditory motion with uncrossed and crossed arms.
Jiang Y; Chen L
Multisens Res; 2013; 26(1-2):19-51. PubMed ID: 23713198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Concurrent visual and tactile steady-state evoked potentials index allocation of inter-modal attention: a frequency-tagging study.
Porcu E; Keitel C; Müller MM
Neurosci Lett; 2013 Nov; 556():113-7. PubMed ID: 24120431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Oscillatory Properties of Functional Connections Between Sensory Areas Mediate Cross-Modal Illusory Perception.
Cooke J; Poch C; Gillmeister H; Costantini M; Romei V
J Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 39(29):5711-5718. PubMed ID: 31109964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tri-modal integration of visual, tactile and auditory signals for the perception of sequences of events.
Bresciani JP; Dammeier F; Ernst MO
Brain Res Bull; 2008 Apr; 75(6):753-60. PubMed ID: 18394521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gating at early cortical processing stages is associated with changes in behavioural performance on a sensory conflict task.
Adams MS; Popovich C; Staines WR
Behav Brain Res; 2017 Jan; 317():179-187. PubMed ID: 27641325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Good times for multisensory integration: Effects of the precision of temporal synchrony as revealed by gamma-band oscillations.
Senkowski D; Talsma D; Grigutsch M; Herrmann CS; Woldorff MG
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):561-71. PubMed ID: 16542688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
Sambo CF; Forster B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modulation of somatosensory event-related potential components in a tactile-visual cross-modal task.
Ohara S; Lenz FA; Zhou YD
Neuroscience; 2006; 138(4):1387-95. PubMed ID: 16442738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Concurrent emotional pictures modulate temporal order judgments of spatially separated audio-tactile stimuli.
Jia L; Shi Z; Zang X; Müller HJ
Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 1537():156-63. PubMed ID: 24041776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities.
Lange K; Röder B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):715-29. PubMed ID: 16768372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Oscillatory mechanisms underlying the enhancement of visual motion perception by multisensory congruency.
Gleiss S; Kayser C
Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():84-93. PubMed ID: 24262657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reciprocal Interactions Between Audition and Touch in Flutter Frequency Perception.
Convento S; Wegner-Clemens KA; Yau JM
Multisens Res; 2019 Jan; 32(1):67-85. PubMed ID: 31059492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Auditory and tactile signals combine to influence vision during binocular rivalry.
Lunghi C; Morrone MC; Alais D
J Neurosci; 2014 Jan; 34(3):784-92. PubMed ID: 24431437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cross-modal interactions between audition, touch, and vision in endogenous spatial attention: ERP evidence on preparatory states and sensory modulations.
Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 14(2):254-71. PubMed ID: 11970790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Haptic and visual information speed up the neural processing of auditory speech in live dyadic interactions.
Treille A; Cordeboeuf C; Vilain C; Sato M
Neuropsychologia; 2014 May; 57():71-7. PubMed ID: 24530236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lost in vision: ERP correlates of exogenous tactile attention when engaging in a visual task.
Jones A; Forster B
Neuropsychologia; 2013 Mar; 51(4):675-85. PubMed ID: 23340481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
