609 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24736186)
21. Integrated trimodal SSEP experimental setup for visual, auditory and tactile stimulation.
Kuś R; Spustek T; Zieleniewska M; Duszyk A; Rogowski P; Suffczyński P
J Neural Eng; 2017 Dec; 14(6):066002. PubMed ID: 28786397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Distinct patterns of local oscillatory activity and functional connectivity underlie intersensory attention and temporal prediction.
Keil J; Pomper U; Senkowski D
Cortex; 2016 Jan; 74():277-88. PubMed ID: 26716405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multisensory integration: central processing modifies peripheral systems.
Lugo JE; Doti R; Wittich W; Faubert J
Psychol Sci; 2008 Oct; 19(10):989-97. PubMed ID: 19000209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Crossmodal interactions and multisensory integration in the perception of audio-visual motion -- a free-field study.
Schmiedchen K; Freigang C; Nitsche I; Rübsamen R
Brain Res; 2012 Jul; 1466():99-111. PubMed ID: 22617375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Modality-specificity of sensory aging in vision and audition: evidence from event-related potentials.
Ceponiene R; Westerfield M; Torki M; Townsend J
Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():53-68. PubMed ID: 18482717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The co-occurrence of multisensory facilitation and cross-modal conflict in the human brain.
Diaconescu AO; Alain C; McIntosh AR
J Neurophysiol; 2011 Dec; 106(6):2896-909. PubMed ID: 21880944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sensory modality-specific spatio-temporal dynamics in response to counting tasks.
Gohel B; Jeong Y
Neurosci Lett; 2014 Oct; 581():20-5. PubMed ID: 25130313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Steady-state responses in MEG demonstrate information integration within but not across the auditory and visual senses.
Giani AS; Ortiz E; Belardinelli P; Kleiner M; Preissl H; Noppeney U
Neuroimage; 2012 Apr; 60(2):1478-89. PubMed ID: 22305992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dissociation of psychophysical and EEG steady-state response measures of cross-modal temporal correspondence for amplitude modulated acoustic and vibrotactile stimulation.
Timora JR; Budd TW
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):433-43. PubMed ID: 23770083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Signal reliability modulates auditory-tactile integration for event counting.
Bresciani JP; Ernst MO
Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(11):1157-61. PubMed ID: 17589318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Acoustic noise improves visual perception and modulates occipital oscillatory states.
Gleiss S; Kayser C
J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Apr; 26(4):699-711. PubMed ID: 24236698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cross-modal deactivations during modality-specific selective attention.
Mozolic JL; Joyner D; Hugenschmidt CE; Peiffer AM; Kraft RA; Maldjian JA; Laurienti PJ
BMC Neurol; 2008 Sep; 8():35. PubMed ID: 18817554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Modality-independent reduction mechanisms of primary sensory evoked fields in a one-back task.
Hanke D; Huonker R; Weiss T; Witte OW; Götz T
Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):918-922. PubMed ID: 26436711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Event-related potential evidence for a dynamic (re-)weighting of somatotopic and external coordinates of touch during visual-tactile interactions.
Ley P; Steinberg U; Hanganu-Opatz IL; Röder B
Eur J Neurosci; 2015 May; 41(11):1466-74. PubMed ID: 25879770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The impact of stimulus modality on the processing of conflicting sensory information during response inhibition.
Friedrich J; Beste C
Neuroscience; 2019 Jul; 410():191-201. PubMed ID: 31100340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. BOLD responses to tactile stimuli in visual and auditory cortex depend on the frequency content of stimulation.
Nordmark PF; Pruszynski JA; Johansson RS
J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Oct; 24(10):2120-34. PubMed ID: 22721377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems.
Turatto M; Galfano G; Bridgeman B; Umiltà C
Exp Brain Res; 2004 Apr; 155(3):301-10. PubMed ID: 14658019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
