BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24737098)

  • 1. The value and cost of complexity in predictive modelling: role of tissue anisotropic conductivity and fibre tracts in neuromodulation.
    Shahid SS; Bikson M; Salman H; Wen P; Ahfock T
    J Neural Eng; 2014 Jun; 11(3):036002. PubMed ID: 24737098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of electric field distribution in anisotropic cortical and subcortical regions under the influence of tDCS.
    Shahid S; Wen P; Ahfock T
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2014 Jan; 35(1):41-57. PubMed ID: 24122951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of anisotropic conductivity in the skull and white matter on transcranial direct current stimulation via an anatomically realistic finite element head model.
    Suh HS; Lee WH; Kim TS
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6961-80. PubMed ID: 23044667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The electric field distributions in anatomical head models during transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke rehabilitation.
    Manoli Z; Parazzini M; Ravazzani P; Samaras T
    Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):262-271. PubMed ID: 28044315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computational models of transcranial direct current stimulation.
    Bikson M; Rahman A; Datta A
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2012 Jul; 43(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 22956646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of anisotropic modelling in electrical impedance tomography: description of method and preliminary assessment of utility in imaging brain function in the adult human head.
    Abascal JF; Arridge SR; Atkinson D; Horesh R; Fabrizi L; De Lucia M; Horesh L; Bayford RH; Holder DS
    Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):258-68. PubMed ID: 18694835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changing head model extent affects finite element predictions of transcranial direct current stimulation distributions.
    Indahlastari A; Chauhan M; Schwartz B; Sadleir RJ
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Dec; 13(6):066006. PubMed ID: 27705955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial and polarity precision of concentric high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS).
    Alam M; Truong DQ; Khadka N; Bikson M
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jun; 61(12):4506-21. PubMed ID: 27223853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of Computational Modeling to Inform tDCS Electrode Montages for the Promotion of Language Recovery in Post-stroke Aphasia.
    Galletta EE; Cancelli A; Cottone C; Simonelli I; Tecchio F; Bikson M; Marangolo P
    Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(6):1108-15. PubMed ID: 26198364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modelling the effect of electrode displacement on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
    Ramaraju S; Roula MA; McCarthy PW
    J Neural Eng; 2018 Feb; 15(1):016019. PubMed ID: 28925375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Numerical investigation of white matter anisotropic conductivity in defining current distribution under tDCS.
    Shahid S; Wen P; Ahfock T
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Jan; 109(1):48-64. PubMed ID: 23040278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transcranial DC stimulation in fibromyalgia: optimized cortical target supported by high-resolution computational models.
    Mendonca ME; Santana MB; Baptista AF; Datta A; Bikson M; Fregni F; Araujo CP
    J Pain; 2011 May; 12(5):610-7. PubMed ID: 21497140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The New York Head-A precise standardized volume conductor model for EEG source localization and tES targeting.
    Huang Y; Parra LC; Haufe S
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():150-62. PubMed ID: 26706450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methods for high-resolution anisotropic finite element modeling of the human head: automatic MR white matter anisotropy-adaptive mesh generation.
    Lee WH; Kim TS
    Med Eng Phys; 2012 Jan; 34(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 21820347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cranial electrotherapy stimulation and transcranial pulsed current stimulation: a computer based high-resolution modeling study.
    Datta A; Dmochowski JP; Guleyupoglu B; Bikson M; Fregni F
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 65():280-7. PubMed ID: 23041337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulating transcranial direct current stimulation with a detailed anisotropic human head model.
    Rampersad SM; Janssen AM; Lucka F; Aydin Ü; Lanfer B; Lew S; Wolters CH; Stegeman DF; Oostendorp TF
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 May; 22(3):441-52. PubMed ID: 24760939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation.
    Opitz A; Paulus W; Will S; Antunes A; Thielscher A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 109():140-50. PubMed ID: 25613437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigation of tDCS volume conduction effects in a highly realistic head model.
    Wagner S; Rampersad SM; Aydin Ü; Vorwerk J; Oostendorp TF; Neuling T; Herrmann CS; Stegeman DF; Wolters CH
    J Neural Eng; 2014 Feb; 11(1):016002. PubMed ID: 24310982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.