270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24737141)
1. Retention of fissure sealants in young permanent molars affected by dental fluorosis: a 12-month clinical study.
Hasanuddin S; Reddy ER; Manjula M; Srilaxmi N; Rani ST; Rajesh A
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2014 Oct; 15(5):309-15. PubMed ID: 24737141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of acid versus laser etching on the clinical performance of a fissure sealant: 24-month results.
Karaman E; Yazici AR; Baseren M; Gorucu J
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 23092148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of marginal integrity of glass ionomer and resin based fissure sealants using invasive and non-invasive techniques: an in vitro study.
Gunjal S; Nagesh L; Raju HG
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 23059566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Twenty-four month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants on partially erupted permanent first molars: glass ionomer versus resin-based sealant.
Antonson SA; Antonson DE; Brener S; Crutchfield J; Larumbe J; Michaud C; Yazici AR; Hardigan PC; Alempour S; Evans D; Ocanto R
J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Feb; 143(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 22298552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retention of a resin-based sealant and a glass ionomer used as a fissure sealant: a comparative clinical study.
Subramaniam P; Konde S; Mandanna DK
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2008 Sep; 26(3):114-20. PubMed ID: 18923223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A two-year clinical evaluation of glass ionomer and ormocer based fissure sealants.
Guler C; Yilmaz Y
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013; 37(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 23855170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retention of fissure sealants using two different methods of application in teeth with hypomineralised molars (MIH): a 4 year clinical study.
Lygidakis NA; Dimou G; Stamataki E
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2009 Dec; 10(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 19995506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The success rates of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant placed by fifth-year undergraduate dental students.
Ulusu T; Odabaş ME; Tüzüner T; Baygin O; Sillelioğlu H; Deveci C; Gökdoğan FG; Altuntaş A
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2012 Apr; 13(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 22449810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study.
Erdemir U; Sancakli HS; Yaman BC; Ozel S; Yucel T; Yıldız E
J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 24296163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of FUJI VII sealant material.
Ganesh M; Tandon S
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 31(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 17091660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Survival Analysis of Glass Ionomer Cement and Resin-Based Sealant Retention: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study.
Petrauskienė S; Saldūnaitė-Mikučionienė K; Narbutaitė J
Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 May; 60(5):. PubMed ID: 38792939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Retention and caries preventive effects of a GIC and a resin-based fissure sealant.
Arrow P; Riordan PJ
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1995 Oct; 23(5):282-5. PubMed ID: 8529341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. One-year clinical evaluation of a Glass Carbomer fissure sealant, a preliminary study.
Gorseta K; Glavina D; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Van Duinen RN; Skrinjaric I; Hill RG; Lynch E
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2014 Jun; 22(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 25134364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A 5-year evaluation of two glass-ionomer cements used as fissure sealants.
Pardi V; Pereira AC; Mialhe FL; Meneghim Mde C; Ambrosano GM
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2003 Oct; 31(5):386-91. PubMed ID: 14667010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Caries prevention effectiveness of aresin based sealant and a glass ionomer sealants: a report of 5-year-follow-up].
Liu YJ; Chang Q; Rong WS; Zhao XL
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 53(7):437-442. PubMed ID: 29996359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Retention rates and caries-preventive effects of two different sealant materials: a randomised clinical trial.
Cabral RN; Faber J; Otero SAM; Hilgert LA; Leal SC
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec; 22(9):3171-3177. PubMed ID: 29524027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Caries-Preventive Effect and Retention of Glass-Ionomer and Resin-Based Sealants: A Randomized Clinical Comparative Evaluation.
Uzel I; Gurlek C; Kuter B; Ertugrul F; Eden E
Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():7205692. PubMed ID: 35769675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical and antibacterial effectiveness of three different sealant materials.
Amin HE
J Dent Hyg; 2008; 82(5):45. PubMed ID: 19055885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retention of Moisture-tolerant and Conventional Resin-based Sealant in Six- to Nine-year-old Children.
Khatri SG; Samuel SR; Acharya S; Patil S; Madan K
Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 26314605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Glass ionomer ART sealant and fluoride-releasing resin sealant in fissure caries prevention--results from a randomized clinical trial.
Liu BY; Xiao Y; Chu CH; Lo EC
BMC Oral Health; 2014 May; 14():54. PubMed ID: 24886444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
