170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24737607)
1. A comparative analysis of methods for predicting clinical outcomes using high-dimensional genomic datasets.
Jiang X; Cai B; Xue D; Lu X; Cooper GF; Neapolitan RE
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2014 Oct; 21(e2):e312-9. PubMed ID: 24737607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computational methods for ubiquitination site prediction using physicochemical properties of protein sequences.
Cai B; Jiang X
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 17():116. PubMed ID: 26940649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The application of naive Bayes model averaging to predict Alzheimer's disease from genome-wide data.
Wei W; Visweswaran S; Cooper GF
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2011; 18(4):370-5. PubMed ID: 21672907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new method for predicting patient survivorship using efficient bayesian network learning.
Jiang X; Xue D; Brufsky A; Khan S; Neapolitan R
Cancer Inform; 2014; 13():47-57. PubMed ID: 24558297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mining pure, strict epistatic interactions from high-dimensional datasets: ameliorating the curse of dimensionality.
Jiang X; Neapolitan RE
PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e46771. PubMed ID: 23071633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning genetic epistasis using Bayesian network scoring criteria.
Jiang X; Neapolitan RE; Barmada MM; Visweswaran S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Mar; 12():89. PubMed ID: 21453508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic studies of complex human diseases: characterizing SNP-disease associations using Bayesian networks.
Han B; Chen XW; Talebizadeh Z; Xu H
BMC Syst Biol; 2012; 6 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S14. PubMed ID: 23281790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interpretable artificial neural networks incorporating Bayesian alphabet models for genome-wide prediction and association studies.
Zhao T; Fernando R; Cheng H
G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Sep; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 34499126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a two-stage framework for prediction using big genomic data.
Jiang X; Neapolitan RE
Brief Bioinform; 2015 Nov; 16(6):912-21. PubMed ID: 25788325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Discovering causal interactions using Bayesian network scoring and information gain.
Zeng Z; Jiang X; Neapolitan R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 May; 17(1):221. PubMed ID: 27230078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. LEAP: biomarker inference through learning and evaluating association patterns.
Jiang X; Neapolitan RE
Genet Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 39(3):173-84. PubMed ID: 25677188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A fast algorithm for learning epistatic genomic relationships.
Jiang X; Neapolitan RE; Barmada MM; Visweswaran S; Cooper GF
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2010 Nov; 2010():341-5. PubMed ID: 21346997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genome-wide prediction using Bayesian additive regression trees.
Waldmann P
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):42. PubMed ID: 27286957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of genetic algorithms and constructive neural networks for the analysis of microarray cancer data.
Luque-Baena RM; Urda D; Subirats JL; Franco L; Jerez JM
Theor Biol Med Model; 2014 May; 11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S7. PubMed ID: 25077572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Approximate Bayesian neural networks in genomic prediction.
Waldmann P
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):70. PubMed ID: 30577737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An algorithm for direct causal learning of influences on patient outcomes.
Rathnam C; Lee S; Jiang X
Artif Intell Med; 2017 Jan; 75():1-15. PubMed ID: 28363452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. bNEAT: a Bayesian network method for detecting epistatic interactions in genome-wide association studies.
Han B; Chen XW
BMC Genomics; 2011; 12 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S9. PubMed ID: 21989368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for meat tenderness in Polled Nellore cattle.
Magnabosco CU; Lopes FB; Fragoso RC; Eifert EC; Valente BD; Rosa GJ; Sainz RD
J Anim Sci; 2016 Jul; 94(7):2752-60. PubMed ID: 27482662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Machine learning algorithms for outcome prediction in (chemo)radiotherapy: An empirical comparison of classifiers.
Deist TM; Dankers FJWM; Valdes G; Wijsman R; Hsu IC; Oberije C; Lustberg T; van Soest J; Hoebers F; Jochems A; El Naqa I; Wee L; Morin O; Raleigh DR; Bots W; Kaanders JH; Belderbos J; Kwint M; Solberg T; Monshouwer R; Bussink J; Dekker A; Lambin P
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3449-3459. PubMed ID: 29763967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cuckoo search epistasis: a new method for exploring significant genetic interactions.
Aflakparast M; Salimi H; Gerami A; Dubé MP; Visweswaran S; Masoudi-Nejad A
Heredity (Edinb); 2014 Jun; 112(6):666-74. PubMed ID: 24549111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
