150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24737981)
1. Investigation on mercury reemission from limestone-gypsum wet flue gas desulfurization slurry.
Chen C; Liu S; Gao Y; Liu Y
ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():581724. PubMed ID: 24737981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving the removal of fine particles by chemical agglomeration during the limestone-gypsum wet flue gas desulfurization process.
Zhou L; Liu Y; Luo L; Yuan Z; Yang L; Wu H
J Environ Sci (China); 2019 Jun; 80():35-44. PubMed ID: 30952350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transformation and removal of ammonium sulfate aerosols and ammonia slip from selective catalytic reduction in wet flue gas desulfurization system.
Cheng T; Zhou X; Yang L; Wu H; Fan H
J Environ Sci (China); 2020 Feb; 88():72-80. PubMed ID: 31862081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental study on the absorption behaviors of gas phase bivalent mercury in Ca-based wet flue gas desulfurization slurry system.
Wang Y; Liu Y; Wu Z; Mo J; Cheng B
J Hazard Mater; 2010 Nov; 183(1-3):902-7. PubMed ID: 20739119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fate of mercury in flue gas desulfurization gypsum determined by Temperature Programmed Decomposition and Sequential Chemical Extraction.
Zhu Z; Zhuo Y; Fan Y; Wang Z
J Environ Sci (China); 2016 May; 43():169-176. PubMed ID: 27155422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of Oxy-Fuel Conditions on Elemental Mercury Re-Emission in Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Systems.
Fernández-Miranda N; Lopez-Anton MA; Torre-Santos T; Díaz-Somoano M; Martínez-Tarazona MR
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 50(13):7247-53. PubMed ID: 27329988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The capture of oxidized mercury from simulated desulphurization aqueous solutions.
Ochoa-González R; Díaz-Somoano M; Martínez-Tarazona MR
J Environ Manage; 2013 May; 120():55-60. PubMed ID: 23500649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hg2+ reduction and re-emission from simulated wet flue gas desulfurization liquors.
Wo J; Zhang M; Cheng X; Zhong X; Xu J; Xu X
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Dec; 172(2-3):1106-10. PubMed ID: 19699584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Technical description of parameters influencing the pH value of suspension absorbent used in flue gas desulfurization systems.
Głomba M
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2010 Aug; 60(8):1009-16. PubMed ID: 20842941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of wet flue gas desulfurization scrubbing on mercury emissions from coal-fired power stations.
Niksa S; Fujiwara N
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2005 Jul; 55(7):970-7. PubMed ID: 16111136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A potential source for PM
Jiang B; Xie Y; Xia D; Liu X
Environ Pollut; 2019 Mar; 246():249-256. PubMed ID: 30557798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Migration and distribution characteristics of typical organic pollutants in condensable particulate matter of coal-fired flue gas and by-products of wet flue gas desulfurization system.
Xu Z; Wu Y; Liu S; Tang M; Lu S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Apr; 31(17):26170-26181. PubMed ID: 38498134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distribution of mercury in the combustion products from coal-fired power plants in Guizhou, southwest China.
Liu S; Chen J; Cao Y; Yang H; Chen C; Jia W
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 Feb; 69(2):234-245. PubMed ID: 30396327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of limestone characteristics on mercury re-emission in WFGD systems.
Ochoa-González R; Díaz-Somoano M; Martínez-Tarazona MR
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Mar; 47(6):2974-81. PubMed ID: 23439036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utilization of Water Utility Lime Sludge for Flue Gas Desulfurization in Coal-Fired Power Plants: Part III. Testing at a Higher Scale and Assessment of Selected Potential Operational Issues.
Dastgheib SA; Mock J; Salih HH; Patterson C
Energy Fuels; 2019; 33(11):11536-11543. PubMed ID: 31844359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simultaneous removal of NO
Jędrusik M; Łuszkiewicz D; Świerczok A; Gostomczyk MA; Kobylańska-Pawlisz M
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2020 Jun; 70(6):629-640. PubMed ID: 32182191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of calcium formate as an additive on desulfurization in power plants.
Li Z; Xie C; Lv J; Zhai R
J Environ Sci (China); 2018 May; 67():89-95. PubMed ID: 29778177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of additives on Hg2+ reduction and precipitation inhibited by sodium dithiocarbamate in simulated flue gas desulfurization solutions.
Lu R; Hou J; Xu J; Tang T; Xu X
J Hazard Mater; 2011 Nov; 196():160-5. PubMed ID: 21955657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using Wet-FGD systems for mercury removal.
Díaz-Somoano M; Unterberger S; Hein KR
J Environ Monit; 2005 Sep; 7(9):906-9. PubMed ID: 16121271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simulation and evaluation of elemental mercury concentration increase in flue gas across a wet scrubber.
Chang JC; Ghorishi SB
Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Dec; 37(24):5763-6. PubMed ID: 14717192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
