These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24738774)
21. Effect of cue-target interval on the N2pc. Robitaille N; Jolicoeur P Neuroreport; 2006 Oct; 17(15):1655-8. PubMed ID: 17001287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The role of visual attention in multiple object tracking: evidence from ERPs. Doran MM; Hoffman JE Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jan; 72(1):33-52. PubMed ID: 20802834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The deployment of visual spatial attention during visual search predicts response time: electrophysiological evidence from the N2pc. Drisdelle BL; West GL; Jolicoeur P Neuroreport; 2016 Nov; 27(16):1237-42. PubMed ID: 27648715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands. Kiss M; Grubert A; Petersen A; Eimer M J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 24(3):749-59. PubMed ID: 21861683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Understanding how visual attention locks on to a location: Toward a computational model of the N2pc component. Tan M; Wyble B Psychophysiology; 2015 Feb; 52(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 25252220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The N2pc component and stimulus duration. Brisson B; Jolicoeur P Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(11):1163-6. PubMed ID: 17589319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Distilling the distinct contralateral and ipsilateral attentional responses to lateral stimuli and the bilateral response to midline stimuli for upper and lower visual hemifield locations. Monnier A; Dell'Acqua R; Jolicoeur P Psychophysiology; 2020 Nov; 57(11):e13651. PubMed ID: 32797636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts. Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The allocation of attention and working memory in visual crowding. Bacigalupo F; Luck SJ J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Jun; 27(6):1180-93. PubMed ID: 25514655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bias for the left visual field in rapid serial visual presentation: effects of additional salient cues suggest a critical role of attention. Śmigasiewicz K; Asanowicz D; Westphal N; Verleger R J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Feb; 27(2):266-79. PubMed ID: 25203275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. ERP evidence for cross-modal audiovisual effects of endogenous spatial attention within hemifields. Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):272-88. PubMed ID: 15068597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Experience-dependent changes in the topography of visual crowding. Williamson K; Scolari M; Jeong S; Kim MS; Awh E J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):15.1-9. PubMed ID: 20053078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Two's company, three's a crowd: Individuation is necessary for object recognition. Chakravarthi R; Herbert A Cognition; 2019 Mar; 184():69-82. PubMed ID: 30576886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Context homogeneity facilitates both distractor inhibition and target enhancement. Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A J Vis; 2013 May; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23650629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Neural responses to target features outside a search array are enhanced during conjunction but not unique-feature search. Painter DR; Dux PE; Travis SL; Mattingley JB J Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 34(9):3390-401. PubMed ID: 24573295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]