These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

827 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24739896)

  • 1. Panitumumab versus cetuximab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer (ASPECCT): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 study.
    Price TJ; Peeters M; Kim TW; Li J; Cascinu S; Ruff P; Suresh AS; Thomas A; Tjulandin S; Zhang K; Murugappan S; Sidhu R
    Lancet Oncol; 2014 May; 15(6):569-79. PubMed ID: 24739896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Final results and outcomes by prior bevacizumab exposure, skin toxicity, and hypomagnesaemia from ASPECCT: randomized phase 3 non-inferiority study of panitumumab versus cetuximab in chemorefractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Price T; Kim TW; Li J; Cascinu S; Ruff P; Suresh AS; Thomas A; Tjulandin S; Guan X; Peeters M
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 Nov; 68():51-59. PubMed ID: 27716478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Panitumumab and irinotecan versus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type, fluorouracil-resistant advanced colorectal cancer (PICCOLO): a prospectively stratified randomised trial.
    Seymour MT; Brown SR; Middleton G; Maughan T; Richman S; Gwyther S; Lowe C; Seligmann JF; Wadsley J; Maisey N; Chau I; Hill M; Dawson L; Falk S; O'Callaghan A; Benstead K; Chambers P; Oliver A; Marshall H; Napp V; Quirke P
    Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jul; 14(8):749-59. PubMed ID: 23725851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Panitumumab in patients with KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer after progression on cetuximab.
    Wadlow RC; Hezel AF; Abrams TA; Blaszkowsky LS; Fuchs CS; Kulke MH; Kwak EL; Meyerhardt JA; Ryan DP; Szymonifka J; Wolpin BM; Zhu AX; Clark JW
    Oncologist; 2012; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 22210091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Economic Analysis of Panitumumab Compared With Cetuximab in Patients With Wild-type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Progressed After Standard Chemotherapy.
    Graham CN; Maglinte GA; Schwartzberg LS; Price TJ; Knox HN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; Barber B; Fakih MG
    Clin Ther; 2016 Jun; 38(6):1376-1391. PubMed ID: 27085587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.
    Heinemann V; von Weikersthal LF; Decker T; Kiani A; Vehling-Kaiser U; Al-Batran SE; Heintges T; Lerchenmüller C; Kahl C; Seipelt G; Kullmann F; Stauch M; Scheithauer W; Hielscher J; Scholz M; Müller S; Link H; Niederle N; Rost A; Höffkes HG; Moehler M; Lindig RU; Modest DP; Rossius L; Kirchner T; Jung A; Stintzing S
    Lancet Oncol; 2014 Sep; 15(10):1065-75. PubMed ID: 25088940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized, phase II study of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor inhibitor IMC-A12, with or without cetuximab, in patients with cetuximab- or panitumumab-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Reidy DL; Vakiani E; Fakih MG; Saif MW; Hecht JR; Goodman-Davis N; Hollywood E; Shia J; Schwartz J; Chandrawansa K; Dontabhaktuni A; Youssoufian H; Solit DB; Saltz LB
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Sep; 28(27):4240-6. PubMed ID: 20713879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cisplatin and fluorouracil with or without panitumumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SPECTRUM): an open-label phase 3 randomised trial.
    Vermorken JB; Stöhlmacher-Williams J; Davidenko I; Licitra L; Winquist E; Villanueva C; Foa P; Rottey S; Skladowski K; Tahara M; Pai VR; Faivre S; Blajman CR; Forastiere AA; Stein BN; Oliner KS; Pan Z; Bach BA;
    Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jul; 14(8):697-710. PubMed ID: 23746666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No survival benefit from adding cetuximab or panitumumab to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in KRAS wild type patients: a meta-analysis.
    Zhou SW; Huang YY; Wei Y; Jiang ZM; Zhang YD; Yang Q; Xie DR
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e50925. PubMed ID: 23226426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study.
    Douillard JY; Siena S; Cassidy J; Tabernero J; Burkes R; Barugel M; Humblet Y; Bodoky G; Cunningham D; Jassem J; Rivera F; Kocákova I; Ruff P; Błasińska-Morawiec M; Šmakal M; Canon JL; Rother M; Oliner KS; Wolf M; Gansert J
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Nov; 28(31):4697-705. PubMed ID: 20921465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin with or without cetuximab in patients with resected stage III colon cancer (PETACC-8): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.
    Taieb J; Tabernero J; Mini E; Subtil F; Folprecht G; Van Laethem JL; Thaler J; Bridgewater J; Petersen LN; Blons H; Collette L; Van Cutsem E; Rougier P; Salazar R; Bedenne L; Emile JF; Laurent-Puig P; Lepage C;
    Lancet Oncol; 2014 Jul; 15(8):862-73. PubMed ID: 24928083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized phase III study of panitumumab with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Peeters M; Price TJ; Cervantes A; Sobrero AF; Ducreux M; Hotko Y; André T; Chan E; Lordick F; Punt CJ; Strickland AH; Wilson G; Ciuleanu TE; Roman L; Van Cutsem E; Tzekova V; Collins S; Oliner KS; Rong A; Gansert J
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Nov; 28(31):4706-13. PubMed ID: 20921462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis.
    De Roock W; Claes B; Bernasconi D; De Schutter J; Biesmans B; Fountzilas G; Kalogeras KT; Kotoula V; Papamichael D; Laurent-Puig P; Penault-Llorca F; Rougier P; Vincenzi B; Santini D; Tonini G; Cappuzzo F; Frattini M; Molinari F; Saletti P; De Dosso S; Martini M; Bardelli A; Siena S; Sartore-Bianchi A; Tabernero J; Macarulla T; Di Fiore F; Gangloff AO; Ciardiello F; Pfeiffer P; Qvortrup C; Hansen TP; Van Cutsem E; Piessevaux H; Lambrechts D; Delorenzi M; Tejpar S
    Lancet Oncol; 2010 Aug; 11(8):753-62. PubMed ID: 20619739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomised phase II study of panitumumab plus irinotecan versus cetuximab plus irinotecan in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin (WJOG 6510G).
    Sakai D; Taniguchi H; Sugimoto N; Tamura T; Nishina T; Hara H; Esaki T; Denda T; Sakamoto T; Okuda H; Satoh T; Tsushima T; Makiyama A; Tsuda T; Hosokawa A; Kuramochi H; Tokunaga S; Moriwaki T; Yasui H; Ishida H; Tsuji A; Otsu S; Shimokawa H; Baba E; Sato M; Matsumoto S; Ozaki Y; Shinozaki K; Tamagawa H; Goto M; Kadowaki S; Fujii H; Koh Y; Yamazaki K; Hironaka S; Kishimoto J; Boku N; Hyodo I; Muro K
    Eur J Cancer; 2020 Aug; 135():11-21. PubMed ID: 32526634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Panitumumab after progression on cetuximab in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a single institution experience.
    Marino A; Caliolo C; Sponziello F; Nacci A; Quaranta A; Mazzoni E; Lutrino SE; Rizzo P; Calvani N; Orlando L; Schiavone P; Fedele P; D'Amico M; Chetrì MC; Cinefra M; Ferrara P; Cinieri S
    Tumori; 2015; 101(5):524-8. PubMed ID: 26045117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A phase 3 trial evaluating panitumumab plus best supportive care vs best supportive care in chemorefractory wild-type KRAS or RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Kim TW; Elme A; Kusic Z; Park JO; Udrea AA; Kim SY; Ahn JB; Valencia RV; Krishnan S; Bilic A; Manojlovic N; Dong J; Guan X; Lofton-Day C; Jung AS; Vrdoljak E
    Br J Cancer; 2016 Nov; 115(10):1206-1214. PubMed ID: 27736842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intermittent chemotherapy plus either intermittent or continuous cetuximab for first-line treatment of patients with KRAS wild-type advanced colorectal cancer (COIN-B): a randomised phase 2 trial.
    Wasan H; Meade AM; Adams R; Wilson R; Pugh C; Fisher D; Sydes B; Madi A; Sizer B; Lowdell C; Middleton G; Butler R; Kaplan R; Maughan T;
    Lancet Oncol; 2014 May; 15(6):631-9. PubMed ID: 24703531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. First-line single-agent panitumumab in frail elderly patients with wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer and poor prognostic factors: A phase II study of the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours.
    Sastre J; Massuti B; Pulido G; Guillén-Ponce C; Benavides M; Manzano JL; Reboredo M; Rivera F; Grávalos C; Safont MJ; Martínez Villacampa M; Llovet P; Dotor E; Díaz-Rubio E; Aranda E;
    Eur J Cancer; 2015 Jul; 51(11):1371-80. PubMed ID: 25963019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PEAK: a randomized, multicenter phase II study of panitumumab plus modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Schwartzberg LS; Rivera F; Karthaus M; Fasola G; Canon JL; Hecht JR; Yu H; Oliner KS; Go WY
    J Clin Oncol; 2014 Jul; 32(21):2240-7. PubMed ID: 24687833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
    Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.