These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24740444)

  • 1. Robotically assisted laparoscopic repair of anterior vaginal wall and uterine prolapse by lateral suspension with mesh: initial experience and video.
    Dällenbach P; Veit N
    Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Aug; 25(8):1137-9. PubMed ID: 24740444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes of robotically assisted laparoscopic lateral suspension (RALLS) with mesh for anterior and apical prolapse.
    Dällenbach P; Alec M; Boulvain M; Shabanov S
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Apr; 16(2):287-294. PubMed ID: 33821406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
    Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic-assisted apical lateral suspension for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and perioperative outcomes.
    Simoncini T; Russo E; Mannella P; Giannini A
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5647-5655. PubMed ID: 27287895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic hysteropexy: the initial results of a uterine suspension procedure for uterovaginal prolapse.
    Price N; Slack A; Jackson SR
    BJOG; 2010 Jan; 117(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 20002370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension: Benefits of a Cross-shaped Mesh to Treat Difficult Vaginal Vault Prolapse.
    Dubuisson J; Veit-Rubin N; Bouquet de Jolinière J; Dubuisson JB
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):672. PubMed ID: 26867700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotically assisted laparoscopic lateral suspension: a step-by-step approach aiming to standardize a novel procedure.
    Lange S; Chatziioannidou K; Dällenbach P
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 May; 34(5):1131-1134. PubMed ID: 36826519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surgical Technique for Robot-assisted Sacrocolpopexy Performed via a Single Port.
    Lowenstein L; Matanes E; Burke YZ
    Urology; 2017 May; 103():272. PubMed ID: 28982620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rates of colpopexy and colporrhaphy at the time of hysterectomy for prolapse.
    Fairchild PS; Kamdar NS; Berger MB; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 214(2):262.e1-262.e7. PubMed ID: 26366666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
    Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic and laparoendoscopic single-site utero-sacral ligament suspension for apical vaginal prolapse: evaluation of our technique and perioperative outcomes.
    Davila HH; Gallo T; Bruce L; Landrey C
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):171-177. PubMed ID: 27631421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasonography and robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy with pubocervical fascia reconstruction: comparison with standard technique.
    Davila HH; Abdelhameed S; Malave-Huertas D; Bigay FF; Crawford K; Friedenstab A; Lum K; Bruce L; Goodman L; Gallo T
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Oct; 14(5):759-766. PubMed ID: 32062812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vaginal Sacral Colpopexy: A Natural Orifice Approach to a Gold Standard Procedure.
    Hanes CR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 28642090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted suture versus mesh hysteropexy: a retrospective comparison.
    Gopinath D; Yong C; Harding-Forrester S; McIntyre F; McKenzie D; Carey M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):105-113. PubMed ID: 35881174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Management of vaginal vault prolapse repair with robotically-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy].
    Elliott DS; Chow GK
    Ann Urol (Paris); 2007 Feb; 41(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 17338498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Success rates and outcomes of laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy.
    Daniels S; Robson D; Palacz M; Howell S; Nguyen T; Behnia-Willison F
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 60(2):244-249. PubMed ID: 31840811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.
    Geoffrion R; Larouche M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Apr; 43(4):511-523.e1. PubMed ID: 33548503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
    Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Schmid C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 23633316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Suture Sacrohysteropexy: LUSSH Procedure.
    Jan H; Ghai V
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):356-357. PubMed ID: 29631010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.