These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24740696)

  • 1. Disentangling posterror and postconflict reduction of interference.
    Van der Borght L; Braem S; Notebaert W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1530-6. PubMed ID: 24740696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptation to conflict frequency without contingency and temporal learning: Evidence from the picture-word interference task.
    Spinelli G; Perry JR; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Aug; 45(8):995-1014. PubMed ID: 31144859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No pain, no gain: the affective valence of congruency conditions changes following a successful response.
    Schouppe N; Braem S; De Houwer J; Silvetti M; Verguts T; Ridderinkhof KR; Notebaert W
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Mar; 15(1):251-61. PubMed ID: 25183556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sequential dependencies in the Eriksen flanker task: a direct comparison of two competing accounts.
    Davelaar EJ; Stevens J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 19145021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus conflict predicts conflict adaptation in a numerical flanker task.
    Notebaert W; Verguts T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Dec; 13(6):1078-84. PubMed ID: 17484439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conflict adaptation within but not across NoGo decision criteria: Event-related-potential evidence of specificity in the contextual modulation of cognitive control.
    Feldman JL; Clark SL; Freitas AL
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Jul; 109():132-40. PubMed ID: 26003915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gradual proportion congruent effects in the absence of sequential congruent effects.
    Torres-Quesada M; Lupiáñez J; Milliken B; Funes MJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jun; 149():78-86. PubMed ID: 24742686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Observation of conflict triggers conflict adaptation.
    Chen Y; Gao W; Li Z; Yan M; Yin S; Hu N; Chen A
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2024 Sep; 78(3):190-202. PubMed ID: 39052346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence for conflict monitoring during speech recognition in noise.
    Teubner-Rhodes S; Luu A; Dunterman R; Vaden KI
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Jun; 31(3):1309-1322. PubMed ID: 37989967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mood states influence cognitive control: the case of conflict adaptation.
    Schuch S; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2015 Sep; 79(5):759-72. PubMed ID: 25100233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adjustments to recent and frequent conflict reflect two distinguishable mechanisms.
    Purmann S; Badde S; Wendt M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):350-5. PubMed ID: 19293106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long trial durations normalise the interference effect and sequential updating during healthy aging.
    Aisenberg D; Sapir A; d'Avossa G; Henik A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():169-78. PubMed ID: 25463558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The congruency sequence effect in a modified prime-probe task indexes response-general control.
    Weissman DH; Grant LD; Jones M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1387-1396. PubMed ID: 32881553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sequential conflict resolution under multiple concurrent conflicts: An ERP study.
    Rey-Mermet A; Gade M; Steinhauser M
    Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():411-418. PubMed ID: 30562575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptation to emotional conflict: evidence from a novel face emotion paradigm.
    Clayson PE; Larson MJ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75776. PubMed ID: 24073278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When cognitive control is calibrated: event-related potential correlates of adapting to information-processing conflict despite erroneous response preparation.
    Freitas AL; Banai R; Clark SL
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Nov; 46(6):1226-33. PubMed ID: 19572903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. To adapt or not to adapt: the question of domain-general cognitive control.
    Kan IP; Teubner-Rhodes S; Drummey AB; Nutile L; Krupa L; Novick JM
    Cognition; 2013 Dec; 129(3):637-51. PubMed ID: 24103774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Item-specific control of attention in the Stroop task: Contingency learning is not the whole story in the item-specific proportion-congruent effect.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Apr; 48(3):426-435. PubMed ID: 31705394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognitive performance and electrophysiological indices of cognitive control: a validation study of conflict adaptation.
    Clayson PE; Larson MJ
    Psychophysiology; 2012 May; 49(5):627-37. PubMed ID: 22292850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Generality and specificity in cognitive control: conflict adaptation within and across selective-attention tasks but not across selective-attention and Simon tasks.
    Freitas AL; Clark SL
    Psychol Res; 2015 Jan; 79(1):143-62. PubMed ID: 24487727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.