These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24740999)

  • 1. Assessing the inter-rater agreement for ordinal data through weighted indexes.
    Marasini D; Quatto P; Ripamonti E
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2611-2633. PubMed ID: 24740999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration using offline analysis of the transvaginal ultrasound 'sliding sign' technique: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility.
    Reid S; Lu C; Casikar I; Mein B; Magotti R; Ludlow J; Benzie R; Condous G
    Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1237-46. PubMed ID: 23482338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring inter-rater reliability for nominal data - which coefficients and confidence intervals are appropriate?
    Zapf A; Castell S; Morawietz L; Karch A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Aug; 16():93. PubMed ID: 27495131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measures of agreement between many raters for ordinal classifications.
    Nelson KP; Edwards D
    Stat Med; 2015 Oct; 34(23):3116-32. PubMed ID: 26095449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inter-rater reliability of seven neurolaryngologists in laryngeal EMG signal interpretation.
    Ho GY; Leonhard M; Volk GF; Foerster G; Pototschnig C; Klinge K; Granitzka T; Zienau AK; Schneider-Stickler B
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 276(10):2849-2856. PubMed ID: 31312924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of inter-rater agreement for transient events using Monte Carlo sampled permutations.
    Norman RG; Scott MA
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):931-42. PubMed ID: 16612834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling agreement on categorical scales in the presence of random scorers.
    Vanbelle S; Lesaffre E
    Biostatistics; 2016 Jan; 17(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 26395905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring inter-observer agreement in contour delineation of medical imaging in a dummy run using Fleiss' kappa.
    Rücker G; Schimek-Jasch T; Nestle U
    Methods Inf Med; 2012; 51(6):489-94. PubMed ID: 23160666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Homogeneity score test of AC
    Honda C; Ohyama T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):20. PubMed ID: 32020851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intra- and interobserver agreement with regard to describing adnexal masses using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terminology: reproducibility study involving seven observers.
    Zannoni L; Savelli L; Jokubkiene L; Di Legge A; Condous G; Testa AC; Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 24307182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inter-rater agreement of sputum cytology for lung cancer screening in Japan.
    Endo C; Nakashima R; Taguchi A; Yahata K; Kawahara E; Shimagaki N; Kamio J; Saito Y; Ikeda N; Sato M
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Jul; 43(7):545-50. PubMed ID: 25645403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robustness of
    Vanacore A; Pellegrino MS
    Stat Med; 2022 May; 41(11):1986-2004. PubMed ID: 35124830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement.
    Devane D; Lalor J
    J Adv Nurs; 2005 Oct; 52(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 16164474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of grey zones on the accuracy of agreement measures for ordinal tables.
    Tran QD; Dolgun A; Demirhan H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):70. PubMed ID: 33853549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measures of Agreement with Multiple Raters: Fréchet Variances and Inference.
    Moss J
    Psychometrika; 2024 Jun; 89(2):517-541. PubMed ID: 38190018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inter- and intra-rater reliability of fluoroscopic cough stress testing.
    Glancz LJ; Cartwright R; Cardozo L
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):492-5. PubMed ID: 20604654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Appropriate Statistics for Determining Chance-Removed Interpractitioner Agreement.
    Popplewell M; Reizes J; Zaslawski C
    J Altern Complement Med; 2019 Nov; 25(11):1115-1120. PubMed ID: 29851495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MR reproducibility in the assessment of uterine fibroids for patients scheduled for uterine artery embolization.
    Volkers NA; Hehenkamp WJ; Spijkerboer AM; Moolhuijzen AD; Birnie E; Ankum WM; Reekers JA
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2008; 31(2):260-8. PubMed ID: 18057985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inter- and intra-rater agreement in the assessment of the vascularity of spinal metastases using digital subtraction angiography tumor blush.
    Clausen C; Dahl B; Christiansen Frevert S; Forman JL; Nielsen MB; Lönn L
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Jun; 58(6):734-739. PubMed ID: 27650032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hubert's multi-rater kappa revisited.
    Martín Andrés A; Álvarez Hernández M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 31056757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.