BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24740999)

  • 1. Assessing the inter-rater agreement for ordinal data through weighted indexes.
    Marasini D; Quatto P; Ripamonti E
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2611-2633. PubMed ID: 24740999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration using offline analysis of the transvaginal ultrasound 'sliding sign' technique: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility.
    Reid S; Lu C; Casikar I; Mein B; Magotti R; Ludlow J; Benzie R; Condous G
    Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1237-46. PubMed ID: 23482338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring inter-rater reliability for nominal data - which coefficients and confidence intervals are appropriate?
    Zapf A; Castell S; Morawietz L; Karch A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Aug; 16():93. PubMed ID: 27495131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measures of agreement between many raters for ordinal classifications.
    Nelson KP; Edwards D
    Stat Med; 2015 Oct; 34(23):3116-32. PubMed ID: 26095449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inter-rater reliability of seven neurolaryngologists in laryngeal EMG signal interpretation.
    Ho GY; Leonhard M; Volk GF; Foerster G; Pototschnig C; Klinge K; Granitzka T; Zienau AK; Schneider-Stickler B
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 276(10):2849-2856. PubMed ID: 31312924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of inter-rater agreement for transient events using Monte Carlo sampled permutations.
    Norman RG; Scott MA
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):931-42. PubMed ID: 16612834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling agreement on categorical scales in the presence of random scorers.
    Vanbelle S; Lesaffre E
    Biostatistics; 2016 Jan; 17(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 26395905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring inter-observer agreement in contour delineation of medical imaging in a dummy run using Fleiss' kappa.
    Rücker G; Schimek-Jasch T; Nestle U
    Methods Inf Med; 2012; 51(6):489-94. PubMed ID: 23160666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Homogeneity score test of AC
    Honda C; Ohyama T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):20. PubMed ID: 32020851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intra- and interobserver agreement with regard to describing adnexal masses using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terminology: reproducibility study involving seven observers.
    Zannoni L; Savelli L; Jokubkiene L; Di Legge A; Condous G; Testa AC; Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 24307182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inter-rater agreement of sputum cytology for lung cancer screening in Japan.
    Endo C; Nakashima R; Taguchi A; Yahata K; Kawahara E; Shimagaki N; Kamio J; Saito Y; Ikeda N; Sato M
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Jul; 43(7):545-50. PubMed ID: 25645403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robustness of
    Vanacore A; Pellegrino MS
    Stat Med; 2022 May; 41(11):1986-2004. PubMed ID: 35124830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement.
    Devane D; Lalor J
    J Adv Nurs; 2005 Oct; 52(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 16164474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of grey zones on the accuracy of agreement measures for ordinal tables.
    Tran QD; Dolgun A; Demirhan H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):70. PubMed ID: 33853549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measures of Agreement with Multiple Raters: Fréchet Variances and Inference.
    Moss J
    Psychometrika; 2024 Jun; 89(2):517-541. PubMed ID: 38190018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inter- and intra-rater reliability of fluoroscopic cough stress testing.
    Glancz LJ; Cartwright R; Cardozo L
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):492-5. PubMed ID: 20604654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Appropriate Statistics for Determining Chance-Removed Interpractitioner Agreement.
    Popplewell M; Reizes J; Zaslawski C
    J Altern Complement Med; 2019 Nov; 25(11):1115-1120. PubMed ID: 29851495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MR reproducibility in the assessment of uterine fibroids for patients scheduled for uterine artery embolization.
    Volkers NA; Hehenkamp WJ; Spijkerboer AM; Moolhuijzen AD; Birnie E; Ankum WM; Reekers JA
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2008; 31(2):260-8. PubMed ID: 18057985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inter- and intra-rater agreement in the assessment of the vascularity of spinal metastases using digital subtraction angiography tumor blush.
    Clausen C; Dahl B; Christiansen Frevert S; Forman JL; Nielsen MB; Lönn L
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Jun; 58(6):734-739. PubMed ID: 27650032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hubert's multi-rater kappa revisited.
    Martín Andrés A; Álvarez Hernández M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 31056757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.