These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands. Kiss M; Grubert A; Petersen A; Eimer M J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 24(3):749-59. PubMed ID: 21861683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neural responses to target features outside a search array are enhanced during conjunction but not unique-feature search. Painter DR; Dux PE; Travis SL; Mattingley JB J Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 34(9):3390-401. PubMed ID: 24573295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search. Hickey C; Di Lollo V; McDonald JJ J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Brain structures involved in visual search in the presence and absence of color singletons. Talsma D; Coe B; Munoz DP; Theeuwes J J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Apr; 22(4):761-74. PubMed ID: 19309291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors. Adam KCS; Serences JT J Neurosci; 2021 Sep; 41(38):8007-8022. PubMed ID: 34330776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search. Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Weinberger M; Awh E J Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 41(14):3180-3191. PubMed ID: 33653697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention. Hickey C; McDonald JJ; Theeuwes J J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):604-13. PubMed ID: 16768363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search. Grubert A; Eimer M J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9527-9538. PubMed ID: 30242053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The initial stage of visual selection is controlled by top-down task set: new ERP evidence. Ansorge U; Kiss M; Worschech F; Eimer M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 21258913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Salience detection and attentional capture. Schubö A Psychol Res; 2009 Mar; 73(2):233-43. PubMed ID: 19066945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search. Schubö A; Müller HJ Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Object-based selection of irrelevant features is not confined to the attended object. Boehler CN; Schoenfeld MA; Heinze HJ; Hopf JM J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2231-9. PubMed ID: 20666592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrophysiological evidence of low salience distractor interference during visual search. Fortier-Gauthier U; Jolicœur P Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13068. PubMed ID: 29423999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamics of target and distractor processing in visual search: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Hilimire MR; Mounts JR; Parks NA; Corballis PM Neurosci Lett; 2011 May; 495(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 21457759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Appearing and disappearing stimuli trigger a reflexive modulation of visual cortical activity. Hopfinger JB; Maxwell JS Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 15907377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proactive suppression can be applied to multiple salient distractors in visual search. Drisdelle BL; Eimer M J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Sep; 152(9):2504-2519. PubMed ID: 37126051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Activation of new attentional templates for real-world objects in visual search. Nako R; Smith TJ; Eimer M J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 May; 27(5):902-12. PubMed ID: 25321485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]