286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24742012)
41. [Comparative analysis of the prognosis of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic or abdominal surgery].
Xu YP; Wang ZQ; Liang XD; Wang Y; Wang JL
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):609-616. PubMed ID: 32957749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Histopathologic score predicts recurrence free survival after radical surgery in patients with stage IA2-IB1-2 cervical carcinoma.
Grisaru DA; Covens A; Franssen E; Chapman W; Shaw P; Colgan T; Murphy J; DePetrillo D; Lickrish G; Laframboise S; Rosen B
Cancer; 2003 Apr; 97(8):1904-8. PubMed ID: 12673716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer.
Pellegrino A; Villa A; Fruscio R; Signorelli M; Meroni MG; Iedà N; Vitobello D
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2008 Oct; 18(5):474-8. PubMed ID: 18936669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Introduction of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: impact on complications, costs and oncologic outcome.
Wallin E; Flöter Rådestad A; Falconer H
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 May; 96(5):536-542. PubMed ID: 28186616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: oncologic outcomes based on tumor diameter.
He J; Hao M; Liu P; Liu Z; Lang J; Bin X; Chen C
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1308-1316. PubMed ID: 32699022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients.
Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using harmonic shears.
Nezhat F; Mahdavi A; Nagarsheth NP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 16431319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Early stage cervical cancer: Brachytherapy followed by type a hysterectomy versus type B radical hysterectomy alone, a retrospective evaluation.
Lacorre A; Merlot B; Garabedian C; Narducci F; Chereau E; Resbeut M; Minsat M; Leblanc E; Houvenaeghel G; Lambaudie E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 42(3):376-82. PubMed ID: 26725307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer.
Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
J Surg Oncol; 2013 Jul; 108(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 23737035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Surgical and oncological outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in obese women with early-stage cervical cancer.
Moss EL; Balega J; Chan KK; Singh K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 22080890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes of Radical Abdominal Trachelectomy Versus Hysterectomy for Stage IA2-IB1 Cervical Cancer.
Guo J; Zhang Y; Chen X; Sun L; Chen K; Sheng X
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):484-491. PubMed ID: 29908338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared With the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer.
Nie JC; Yan AQ; Liu XS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Nov; 27(9):1990-1999. PubMed ID: 28858908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Outcome and prognostic factors of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in 148 patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.
Yan X; Li G; Shang H; Lin F; Yang X; Zheng F
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Feb; 22(2):286-90. PubMed ID: 22146764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Do FIGO stage IA and small (≤2 cm) IB1 cervical adenocarcinomas have a good prognosis and warrant less radical surgery?
Al-Kalbani M; McVeigh G; Nagar H; McCluggage WG
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Feb; 22(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 22080884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Implementation of laparoscopic approach for type B radical hysterectomy: a comparison with open surgical operations.
Ditto A; Martinelli F; Bogani G; Gasparri ML; Di Donato V; Zanaboni F; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25468458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A comparison of stages IB1 and IB2 cervical cancers treated with radical hysterectomy. Is size the real difference?
Rutledge TL; Kamelle SA; Tillmanns TD; Gould NS; Wright JD; Cohn DE; Herzog TJ; Rader JS; Gold MA; Johnson GA; Walker JL; Mannel RS; McMeekin DS
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Oct; 95(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 15385112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparative single-center study between modified laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.
Li X; Pei X; Li H; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Wei Z; Yin Z
World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Dec; 20(1):392. PubMed ID: 36503552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
