These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24742686)

  • 1. Gradual proportion congruent effects in the absence of sequential congruent effects.
    Torres-Quesada M; Lupiáñez J; Milliken B; Funes MJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jun; 149():78-86. PubMed ID: 24742686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. It's more than just conflict: The functional role of congruency in the sequential control adaptation.
    Berger A; Fischer R; Dreisbach G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jun; 197():64-72. PubMed ID: 31103922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Different mechanisms can account for the instruction induced proportion congruency effect.
    Desender K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Mar; 184():39-45. PubMed ID: 28366273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1056-81. PubMed ID: 21113864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ERP Evidence for Implicit Priming of Top-Down Control of Attention.
    Blais C; Hubbard E; Mangun GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 May; 28(5):763-72. PubMed ID: 26765945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Context-specific proportion congruent effects: Compound-cue contingency learning in disguise.
    Schmidt JR; Lemercier C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 May; 72(5):1119-1130. PubMed ID: 29926760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dissociating conflict adaptation from feature integration: a multiple regression approach.
    Notebaert W; Verguts T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1256-60. PubMed ID: 17924821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple expectancies underlie the congruency sequence effect in confound-minimized tasks.
    Erb CD; Aschenbrenner AJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102869. PubMed ID: 31228719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time-out for conflict monitoring theory: Preventing rhythmic biases eliminates the list-level proportion congruent effect.
    Schmidt JR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Mar; 71(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 27977230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociating proportion congruent and conflict adaptation effects in a Simon-Stroop procedure.
    Torres-Quesada M; Funes MJ; Lupiáñez J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Feb; 142(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 23337083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Event-related potential indices of congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds.
    Larson MJ; Clayson PE; Kirwan CB; Weissman DH
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jun; 53(6):814-22. PubMed ID: 26854028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generalizing attentional control across dimensions and tasks: evidence from transfer of proportion-congruent effects.
    Wühr P; Duthoo W; Notebaert W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(4):779-801. PubMed ID: 25380403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resisting distraction and response inhibition trigger similar enhancements of future performance.
    Bissett PG; Grant LD; Weissman DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Oct; 180():40-51. PubMed ID: 28843207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Disentangling posterror and postconflict reduction of interference.
    Van der Borght L; Braem S; Notebaert W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1530-6. PubMed ID: 24740696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissociable early attentional control mechanisms underlying cognitive and affective conflicts.
    Chen T; Kendrick KM; Feng C; Sun S; Yang X; Wang X; Luo W; Yang S; Huang X; Valdés-Sosa PA; Gong Q; Fan J; Luo YJ
    Sci Rep; 2016 Nov; 6():37633. PubMed ID: 27892513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploring relations between task conflict and informational conflict in the Stroop task.
    Entel O; Tzelgov J; Bereby-Meyer Y; Shahar N
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):913-27. PubMed ID: 25420632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The regulation of cognitive control following rostral anterior cingulate cortex lesion in humans.
    di Pellegrino G; Ciaramelli E; Làdavas E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Feb; 19(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 17280516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional control of response selection in task switching.
    Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1315-24. PubMed ID: 26076177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The interactive effects of listwide control, item-based control, and working memory capacity on Stroop performance.
    Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):851-60. PubMed ID: 21517220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Now you see it, now you don't: controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions eliminates the Gratton effect.
    Schmidt JR; De Houwer J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):176-86. PubMed ID: 21745649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.