These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24743678)

  • 21. Laparoscopy-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy as minimally invasive surgery for periampullary tumors: a comparison of short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Mendoza AS; Han HS; Yoon YS; Cho JY; Choi Y
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2015 Dec; 22(12):819-24. PubMed ID: 26455716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: A comprehensive review.
    Wang M; Cai H; Meng L; Cai Y; Wang X; Li Y; Peng B
    Int J Surg; 2016 Nov; 35():139-146. PubMed ID: 27664556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in the era of minimally invasive surgery.
    Shyr YM; Wang SE; Chen SC; Shyr BU
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2020 Jul; 83(7):639-643. PubMed ID: 32332518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of short-term outcomes.
    Yan Q; Xu LB; Ren ZF; Liu C
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 31848756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Short-term Outcomes After Robot-Assisted vs Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy After the Learning Curve.
    Shi Y; Jin J; Qiu W; Weng Y; Wang J; Zhao S; Huo Z; Qin K; Wang Y; Chen H; Deng X; Peng C; Shen B
    JAMA Surg; 2020 May; 155(5):389-394. PubMed ID: 32129815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies.
    Qin H; Qiu J; Zhao Y; Pan G; Zeng Y
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e104274. PubMed ID: 25119463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A systematic review and network meta-analysis of different surgical approaches for pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Kamarajah SK; Bundred JR; Marc OS; Jiao LR; Hilal MA; Manas DM; White SA
    HPB (Oxford); 2020 Mar; 22(3):329-339. PubMed ID: 31676255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a NSQIP Analysis.
    Nassour I; Wang SC; Porembka MR; Yopp AC; Choti MA; Augustine MM; Polanco PM; Mansour JC; Minter RM
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2017 Nov; 21(11):1784-1792. PubMed ID: 28819886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Robotic versus open pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhang J; Wu WM; You L; Zhao YP
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):1774-80. PubMed ID: 23504140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Getting Started with Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Is It Worth It?
    Liang S; Jayaraman S
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Sep; 25(9):712-9. PubMed ID: 26375771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery.
    Vieira MA; Rendón GJ; Munsell M; Echeverri L; Frumovitz M; Schmeler KM; Pareja R; Escobar PF; Reis RD; Ramirez PT
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 138(3):585-9. PubMed ID: 26095894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kamarajah SK; Bundred J; Marc OS; Jiao LR; Manas D; Abu Hilal M; White SA
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Jan; 46(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 31409513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy.
    Chang YS; Wang JX; Chang DW
    J Surg Res; 2015 May; 195(2):465-74. PubMed ID: 25770742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The safety and efficacy of approaches to liver resection: a meta-analysis.
    Jackson NR; Hauch A; Hu T; Buell JF; Slakey DP; Kandil E
    JSLS; 2015; 19(1):e2014.00186. PubMed ID: 25848191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does center or surgeon volume influence adoption of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy? A systematic review and meta-regression.
    Kamarajah SK; Abu Hilal M; White SA
    Surgery; 2021 Apr; 169(4):945-953. PubMed ID: 33183790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mesopancreas level 3 dissection in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Shyr BU; Shyr BS; Chen SC; Shyr YM; Wang SE
    Surgery; 2021 Feb; 169(2):362-368. PubMed ID: 32896373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System.
    Asbun HJ; Stauffer JA
    J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Dec; 215(6):810-9. PubMed ID: 22999327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer: a comprehensive review.
    Rabinovich A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Apr; 291(4):721-7. PubMed ID: 25344420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery.
    Yiannakopoulou E
    Minerva Chir; 2015 Dec; 70(6):437-50. PubMed ID: 26530291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.