146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24744770)
1. Evaluating the impact of genotype errors on rare variant tests of association.
Cook K; Benitez A; Fu C; Tintle N
Front Genet; 2014; 5():62. PubMed ID: 24744770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the impact of differential genotyping errors on rare variant tests of association.
Mayer-Jochimsen M; Fast S; Tintle NL
PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e56626. PubMed ID: 23472072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the impact of non-differential genotyping errors on rare variant tests of association.
Powers S; Gopalakrishnan S; Tintle N
Hum Hered; 2011; 72(3):153-60. PubMed ID: 22004945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hierarchical Bayesian model for rare variant association analysis integrating genotype uncertainty in human sequence data.
He L; Pitkäniemi J; Sarin AP; Salomaa V; Sillanpää MJ; Ripatti S
Genet Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 39(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 25395270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of genotyping errors on statistical power of association tests in genomic analyses: A case study.
Hou L; Sun N; Mane S; Sayward F; Rajeevan N; Cheung KH; Cho K; Pyarajan S; Aslan M; Miller P; Harvey PD; Gaziano JM; Concato J; Zhao H
Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Feb; 41(2):152-162. PubMed ID: 28019059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of genotype calling errors on family-based studies.
Yan Q; Chen R; Sutcliffe JS; Cook EH; Weeks DE; Li B; Chen W
Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():28323. PubMed ID: 27328765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-variant and multi-variant trend tests for genetic association with next-generation sequencing that are robust to sequencing error.
Kim W; Londono D; Zhou L; Xing J; Nato AQ; Musolf A; Matise TC; Finch SJ; Gordon D
Hum Hered; 2012; 74(3-4):172-83. PubMed ID: 23594495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Testing for association with a case-parents design in the presence of genotyping errors.
Morris RW; Kaplan NL
Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):142-54. PubMed ID: 14748014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Testing Rare-Variant Association without Calling Genotypes Allows for Systematic Differences in Sequencing between Cases and Controls.
Hu YJ; Liao P; Johnston HR; Allen AS; Satten GA
PLoS Genet; 2016 May; 12(5):e1006040. PubMed ID: 27152526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increase of rejection rate in case-control studies with the differential genotyping error rates.
Ahn K; Gordon D; Finch SJ
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8():Article25. PubMed ID: 19492983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A unified approach for allele frequency estimation, SNP detection and association studies based on pooled sequencing data using EM algorithms.
Chen Q; Sun F
BMC Genomics; 2013; 14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. PubMed ID: 23369070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Susceptibility of biallelic haplotype and genotype frequencies to genotyping error.
Moskvina V; Schmidt KM
Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1116-23. PubMed ID: 17156286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment and management of single nucleotide polymorphism genotype errors in genetic association analysis.
Gordon D; Ott J
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2001; ():18-29. PubMed ID: 11262939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Real world scenarios in rare variant association analysis: the impact of imbalance and sample size on the power in silico.
Zhang X; Basile AO; Pendergrass SA; Ritchie MD
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):46. PubMed ID: 30669967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. SNP calling by sequencing pooled samples.
Raineri E; Ferretti L; Esteve-Codina A; Nevado B; Heath S; Pérez-Enciso M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 13():239. PubMed ID: 22992255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantifying the percent increase in minimum sample size for SNP genotyping errors in genetic model-based association studies.
Kang SJ; Finch SJ; Haynes C; Gordon D
Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):139-44. PubMed ID: 15812170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A powerful association test of multiple genetic variants using a random-effects model.
Cheng KF; Lee JY; Zheng W; Li C
Stat Med; 2014 May; 33(11):1816-27. PubMed ID: 24338936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new expectation-maximization statistical test for case-control association studies considering rare variants obtained by high-throughput sequencing.
Gordon D; Finch SJ; De La Vega FM
Hum Hered; 2011; 71(2):113-25. PubMed ID: 21734402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the concordance between sequencing, imputation and microarray genotype calls in the GAW18 data.
Rogers A; Beck A; Tintle NL
BMC Proc; 2014; 8(Suppl 1 Genetic Analysis Workshop 18Vanessa Olmo):S22. PubMed ID: 25519374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Confounded by sequencing depth in association studies of rare alleles.
Garner C
Genet Epidemiol; 2011 May; 35(4):261-8. PubMed ID: 21328616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
