These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24744770)

  • 21. Increasing power for tests of genetic association in the presence of phenotype and/or genotype error by use of double-sampling.
    Gordon D; Yang Y; Haynes C; Finch SJ; Mendell NR; Brown AM; Haroutunian V
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article26. PubMed ID: 16646805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. What SNP genotyping errors are most costly for genetic association studies?
    Kang SJ; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 14748013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Comparison Study of Fixed and Mixed Effect Models for Gene Level Association Studies of Complex Traits.
    Fan R; Chiu CY; Jung J; Weeks DE; Wilson AF; Bailey-Wilson JE; Amos CI; Chen Z; Mills JL; Xiong M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 40(8):702-721. PubMed ID: 27374056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Integrating external controls in case-control studies improves power for rare-variant tests.
    Li Y; Lee S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2022 Apr; 46(3-4):145-158. PubMed ID: 35170803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. VarBin, a novel method for classifying true and false positive variants in NGS data.
    Durtschi J; Margraf RL; Coonrod EM; Mallempati KC; Voelkerding KV
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013; 14 Suppl 13(Suppl 13):S2. PubMed ID: 24266885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. LRTae: improving statistical power for genetic association with case/control data when phenotype and/or genotype misclassification errors are present.
    Barral S; Haynes C; Stone M; Gordon D
    BMC Genet; 2006 Apr; 7():24. PubMed ID: 16689984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of differential genotyping error rate on the type I error probability of case-control studies.
    Moskvina V; Craddock N; Holmans P; Owen MJ; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 16612103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluating Imputation Algorithms for Low-Depth Genotyping-By-Sequencing (GBS) Data.
    Chan AW; Hamblin MT; Jannink JL
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160733. PubMed ID: 27537694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The impact of missing and erroneous genotypes on tagging SNP selection and power of subsequent association tests.
    Liu W; Zhao W; Chase GA
    Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 16557026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. PhredEM: a phred-score-informed genotype-calling approach for next-generation sequencing studies.
    Liao P; Satten GA; Hu YJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 41(5):375-387. PubMed ID: 28560825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Linear trend tests for case-control genetic association that incorporate random phenotype and genotype misclassification error.
    Gordon D; Haynes C; Yang Y; Kramer PL; Finch SJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 31(8):853-70. PubMed ID: 17565750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A general method for combining different family-based rare-variant tests of association to improve power and robustness of a wide range of genetic architectures.
    Green A; Cook K; Grinde K; Valcarcel A; Tintle N
    BMC Proc; 2016; 10(Suppl 7):165-170. PubMed ID: 27980630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantifying bias due to allele misclassification in case-control studies of haplotypes.
    Govindarajulu US; Spiegelman D; Miller KL; Kraft P
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 30(7):590-601. PubMed ID: 16830341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. α-1 Antitrypsin Genotype-Phenotype Discrepancy in a 42-Year-Old Man Who Carries the Null-Allele.
    Pavičić T; Ćelap I; Njegovan M; Tešija Kuna A; Štefanović M
    Lab Med; 2020 May; 51(3):301-305. PubMed ID: 31583408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Robust rare variant association testing for quantitative traits in samples with related individuals.
    Jiang D; McPeek MS
    Genet Epidemiol; 2014 Jan; 38(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 24248908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Distinct error rates for reference and nonreference genotypes estimated by pedigree analysis.
    Wang RJ; Radivojac P; Hahn MW
    Genetics; 2021 Mar; 217(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 33683359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Family-based association tests using genotype data with uncertainty.
    Yu Z
    Biostatistics; 2012 Apr; 13(2):228-40. PubMed ID: 22156512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Discordant calls across genotype discovery approaches elucidate variants with systematic errors.
    Atkinson EG; Artomov M; Loboda AA; Rehm HL; MacArthur DG; Karczewski KJ; Neale BM; Daly MJ
    Genome Res; 2023 Jun; 33(6):999-1005. PubMed ID: 37253541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accounting for genotyping errors in tagging SNP selection.
    Liu W; Yang T; Zhao W; Chase GA
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Jul; 71(Pt 4):467-79. PubMed ID: 17346256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of genotyping error on type-I error rate of affected sib pair studies with genotyped parents.
    Seaman SR; Holmans P
    Hum Hered; 2005; 59(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 15925894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.