160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24744840)
1. Changes in strain patterns after implantation of a short stem with metaphyseal anchorage compared to a standard stem: an experimental study in synthetic bone.
Gronewold J; Berner S; Olender G; Hurschler C; Windhagen H; von Lewinski G; Floerkemeier T
Orthop Rev (Pavia); 2014 Jan; 6(1):5211. PubMed ID: 24744840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A short stem with metaphyseal anchorage reveals a more physiological strain pattern compared to a standard stem - an experimental study in cadavaric bone.
Floerkemeier T; Weltin J; Budde S; Hurschler C; Windhagen H; VON Lewinski G; Gronewold J
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2019; 21(2):153-159. PubMed ID: 31741479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of size and CCD-angle of a short stem hip arthroplasty on strain patterns of the proximal femur - an experimental study.
Floerkemeier T; Budde S; Hurschler C; Lewinski G; Windhagen H; Gronewold J
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2017; 19(1):141-149. PubMed ID: 28552922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of resection height on proximal femoral strain patterns after Metha short stem hip arthroplasty: an experimental study on composite femora.
Floerkemeier T; Gronewold J; Berner S; Olender G; Hurschler C; Windhagen H; von Lewinski G
Int Orthop; 2013 Mar; 37(3):369-77. PubMed ID: 23271689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is the strain pattern of conventional stems negatively affected by a previously short stem THA? An experimental study in cadavaric bone.
Floerkemeier T; Arokiasamy R; Budde S; Hurschler C; Windhagen H; von Lewinski G; Gronewold J
Technol Health Care; 2021; 29(2):323-331. PubMed ID: 32568130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Metaphyseal anchoring short stem hip arthroplasty provides a more physiological load transfer: a comparative finite element analysis study.
Yan SG; Chevalier Y; Liu F; Hua X; Schreiner A; Jansson V; Schmidutz F
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Oct; 15(1):498. PubMed ID: 33121506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the Effects of the Metha® Short Stem on Periprosthetic Bone Remodelling in Total Hip Arthroplasties: Results at 48 Months.
Parchi PD; Ciapini G; Castellini I; Mannucci C; Nucci AM; Piolanti N; Maffei S; Lisanti M
Surg Technol Int; 2017 Jul; 30():346-351. PubMed ID: 28277592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can the metaphyseal anchored Metha short stem safely be revised with a standard CLS stem? A biomechanical analysis.
Yan SG; Woiczinski M; Schmidutz TF; Weber P; Paulus AC; Steinbrück A; Jansson V; Schmidutz F
Int Orthop; 2017 Dec; 41(12):2471-2477. PubMed ID: 28488162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Periprosthetic bone remodelling of short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.
Yan SG; Weber P; Steinbrück A; Hua X; Jansson V; Schmidutz F
Int Orthop; 2018 Sep; 42(9):2077-2086. PubMed ID: 29178044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone remodelling around the Metha short stem in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study.
Lerch M; von der Haar-Tran A; Windhagen H; Behrens BA; Wefstaedt P; Stukenborg-Colsman CM
Int Orthop; 2012 Mar; 36(3):533-8. PubMed ID: 21935621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Our experience with the metha short hip stem].
Lacko M; Filip V; Cellár R; Vaško G
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2014; 81(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 24755060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of varus/valgus positioning of the Nanos® and Metha® short-stemmed prostheses on stress shielding of metaphyseal bone.
Brinkmann V; Radetzki F; Gutteck N; Delank S; Zeh A
Acta Orthop Belg; 2017 Mar; 83(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 29322896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative analysis of the biomechanical behavior of two different design metaphyseal-fitting short stems using digital image correlation.
Tatani I; Megas P; Panagopoulos A; Diamantakos I; Nanopoulos P; Pantelakis S
Biomed Eng Online; 2020 Aug; 19(1):65. PubMed ID: 32814586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Femoral revision knee Arthroplasty with Metaphyseal sleeves: the use of a stem is not mandatory of a structural point of view.
Fonseca F; Sousa A; Completo A
J Exp Orthop; 2020 Apr; 7(1):24. PubMed ID: 32337620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Extensometry and primary anchorage of femur implants. Study of the upper metaphyseal intracortical support of the B.P.R cement-less implant].
Delecrin J; Passuti N; Royer J; Rogez JM; Bainvel JV
Acta Orthop Belg; 1989; 55(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 2801075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of two metaphyseal-fitting (short) femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty: study protocol for a prospective randomized clinical trial with additional biomechanical testing and finite element analysis.
Tatani I; Panagopoulos A; Diamantakos I; Sakellaropoulos G; Pantelakis S; Megas P
Trials; 2019 Jun; 20(1):359. PubMed ID: 31208433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Strain distribution in the proximal femur with flexible composite and metallic femoral components under axial and torsional loads.
Otani T; Whiteside LA; White SE
J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):575-85. PubMed ID: 8314810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The biomechanical effect of anteversion and modular neck offset on stress shielding for short-stem versus conventional long-stem hip implants.
Goshulak P; Samiezadeh S; Aziz MS; Bougherara H; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH
Med Eng Phys; 2016 Mar; 38(3):232-40. PubMed ID: 26774671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trade-off between stress shielding and initial stability on an anatomical cementless stem shortening: in-vitro biomechanical study.
Yamako G; Chosa E; Totoribe K; Watanabe S; Sakamoto T
Med Eng Phys; 2015 Aug; 37(8):820-5. PubMed ID: 26117334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How stiffness and distal interlocking of revision hip stems influence the femoral cortical strain pattern.
Ellenrieder M; Steinhauser E; Bader R; Mittelmeier W
J Orthop Sci; 2012 May; 17(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 22406866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
