160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24744840)
21. Deformation pattern and load transfer of an uncemented femoral stem with modular necks. An experimental study in human cadaver femurs.
Enoksen CH; Gjerdet NR; Klaksvik J; Arthursson AJ; Schnell-Husby O; Wik TS
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():28-33. PubMed ID: 26785385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The cementless Bicontact stem in a prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study.
Lerch M; Kurtz A; Windhagen H; Bouguecha A; Behrens BA; Wefstaedt P; Stukenborg-Colsman CM
Int Orthop; 2012 Nov; 36(11):2211-7. PubMed ID: 22864457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A predictive radiological analysis of short stems versus both shortened and long stems in primary hip replacement: A case-control study of 100 cases of Metha versus ABG II and Omnifit HA at 2-8years' follow-up.
Epinette JA; Brax M; Chammaï Y
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Nov; 103(7):981-986. PubMed ID: 28899823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Periprosthetic bone remodeling around short stem.
Synder M; Krajewski K; Sibinski M; Drobniewski M
Orthopedics; 2015 Mar; 38(3 Suppl):S40-5. PubMed ID: 25826631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Tibial revision knee arthroplasty with metaphyseal sleeves: The effect of stems on implant fixation and bone flexibility.
Nadorf J; Kinkel S; Gantz S; Jakubowitz E; Kretzer JP
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177285. PubMed ID: 28481956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical results of the metha short hip stem: a perspective for younger patients?
Thorey F; Hoefer C; Abdi-Tabari N; Lerch M; Budde S; Windhagen H
Orthop Rev (Pavia); 2013; 5(4):e34. PubMed ID: 24416478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biomechanical comparison of newly designed stemless prosthesis and conventional hip prosthesis--an experimental study.
Tai CL; Lee MS; Chen WP; Hsieh PH; Lee PC; Shih CH
Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 15912004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Calcar-guided short-stem total hip arthroplasty: Will it be the future standard? Review and perspectives.
Kutzner KP
World J Orthop; 2021 Aug; 12(8):534-547. PubMed ID: 34485100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Impaction grafting in the femur in cementless modular revision total hip arthroplasty: a descriptive outcome analysis of 243 cases with the MRP-TITAN revision implant.
Wimmer MD; Randau TM; Deml MC; Ascherl R; Nöth U; Forst R; Gravius N; Wirtz D; Gravius S
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2013 Jan; 14():19. PubMed ID: 23311769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mid-term results of short-stem total hip arthroplasty in patients with Crowe type I and II developmental dysplasia of the hip.
Suksathien Y; Tippimanchai T; Akkrasaeng T; Ruangboon C
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):319-325. PubMed ID: 32875473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cementless stem fixation and primary stability under physiological-like loads in vitro.
Heller MO; Kassi JP; Perka C; Duda GN
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Dec; 50(12):394-9. PubMed ID: 16429942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Is there a bone-preserving bone remodelling in short-stem prosthesis? DEXA analysis with the Nanos total hip arthroplasty].
Götze C; Ehrenbrink J; Ehrenbrink H
Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Aug; 148(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 20714981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Strain distribution in the proximal human femur. An in vitro comparison in the intact femur and after insertion of reference and experimental femoral stems.
Kim YH; Kim JS; Cho SH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2001 Mar; 83(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 11284584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Five-year results of a cementless short-hip-stem prosthesis.
Wittenberg RH; Steffen R; Windhagen H; Bücking P; Wilcke A
Orthop Rev (Pavia); 2013 Feb; 5(1):e4. PubMed ID: 23705062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biomechanics of a calcar loading and a shortened tapered femoral stem: Comparative in-vitro testing of primary stability and strain distribution.
Freitag T; Bieger R; Kiefer H; Dornacher D; Reichel H; Ignatius A; Dürselen L
J Exp Orthop; 2021 Sep; 8(1):74. PubMed ID: 34491456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of bone remodelling around short stem and conventional straight stem in total hip replacement: a prospective randomized radiographic and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric study.
Lacko M; Filip V; Gharaibeh A; Lackova A; Folvarsky M; Zamborsky R
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2021; 122(8):548-554. PubMed ID: 34282619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Long-term results and bone remodeling after THA with a short, metaphyseal-fitting anatomic cementless stem.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Kang JS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Mar; 472(3):943-50. PubMed ID: 24163094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Changes in proximal femoral strain after insertion of uncemented standard and customised femoral stems. An experimental study in human femora.
Aamodt A; Lund-Larsen J; Eine J; Andersen E; Benum P; Husby OS
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2001 Aug; 83(6):921-9. PubMed ID: 11521940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of implant overlap on the mechanical properties of the femur.
Harris T; Ruth JT; Szivek J; Haywood B
J Trauma; 2003 May; 54(5):930-5. PubMed ID: 12777906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An in vitro study of the strain distribution in human femora with anatomical and customised femoral stems.
Østbyhaug PO; Klaksvik J; Romundstad P; Aamodt A
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 May; 91(5):676-82. PubMed ID: 19407307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
