These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24745071)

  • 1. A radiographic study on the utility of cranial vault outlines for positive identifications.
    Maxwell AB; Ross AH
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Mar; 59(2):314-8. PubMed ID: 24745071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The utility of elliptical Fourier analysis for estimating ancestry and sex from lateral skull photographs.
    Caple JM; Byrd JE; Stephan CN
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():352-362. PubMed ID: 29957511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Craniofacial identification by comparison of antemortem and postmortem radiographs: two case reports dealing with burnt bodies.
    Campobasso CP; Dell'Erba AS; Belviso M; Di Vella G
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2007 Jun; 28(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 17525575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the variation in individual frontal sinus outlines.
    Christensen AM
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2005 Jul; 127(3):291-5. PubMed ID: 15584070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new experimental approach to computer-aided face/skull identification in forensic anthropology.
    Ricci A; Marella GL; Apostol MA
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2006 Mar; 27(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 16501348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Video superimposition at the C.A. Pound Laboratory 1987 to 1992.
    Austin D
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Jul; 44(4):695-9. PubMed ID: 10432601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Morphometric Outline Analysis of Ancestry and Sex Differences in Cranial Shape.
    Murphy RE; Garvin HM
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1001-1009. PubMed ID: 29193064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Establishing Standards for Side-by-Side Radiographic Comparisons.
    Ross AH; Lanfear AK; Maxwell AB
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2016 Jun; 37(2):86-94. PubMed ID: 26999427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Morphometric comparison of clavicle outlines from 3D bone scans and 2D chest radiographs: a shortlisting tool to assist radiographic identification of human skeletons.
    Stephan CN; Amidan B; Trease H; Guyomarc'h P; Pulsipher T; Byrd JE
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Mar; 59(2):306-13. PubMed ID: 24313347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Skeletal identification using the frontal sinus region: a retrospective study of 39 cases.
    Kirk NJ; Wood RE; Goldstein M
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Mar; 47(2):318-23. PubMed ID: 11908601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ancestry estimation of three Mediterranean populations based on cranial metrics.
    Kranioti EF; García-Donas JG; Can IO; Ekizoglu O
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 May; 286():265.e1-265.e8. PubMed ID: 29576396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiographic identification using midline medical sternotomy wires.
    Fleischman JM
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60 Suppl 1():S3-10. PubMed ID: 25428142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated contour detection in spine radiographs and computed tomography reconstructions for forensic comparative identification.
    Ognard J; Deloire L; Saccardy C; Burdin V; Ben Salem D
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2020 Mar; 16(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 31768873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ancestry Estimation in Forensic Anthropology: Geometric Morphometric versus Standard and Nonstandard Interlandmark Distances.
    Katherine Spradley M; Jantz RL
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Jul; 61(4):892-7. PubMed ID: 27364267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Personal identification on the basis of antemortem and postmortem radiographs.
    Angyal M; Dérczy K
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):1089-93. PubMed ID: 9729833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technical Note: Individuals identified by radiographic comparison: A sample of demographics and the region of body used for identification in Clark County, Nevada, USA (2017-2020).
    Flaherty TM; Byrnes JF
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Feb; 355():111933. PubMed ID: 38277915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The reliability of digitized radiographs for dental identification: a Web-based study.
    Pretty IA; Pretty RJ; Rothwell BR; Sweet D
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Nov; 48(6):1325-30. PubMed ID: 14640280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sex determination by three-dimensional geometric morphometrics of the vault and midsagittal curve of the neurocranium in a modern Greek population sample.
    Chovalopoulou ME; Valakos ED; Manolis SK
    Homo; 2016 Jun; 67(3):173-87. PubMed ID: 27109917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fourier analysis of the forehead shape of skull and sex determination by use of computer.
    Inoue M
    Forensic Sci Int; 1990 Sep; 47(2):101-12. PubMed ID: 2227728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Midsagittal cranial shape variation in the genus Homo by geometric morphometrics.
    Bruner E; Saracino B; Ricci F; Tafuri M; Passarello P; Manzi G
    Coll Antropol; 2004 Jun; 28(1):99-112. PubMed ID: 15636068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.