These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24745489)
1. Re: perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic compared with open prostatectomy using the national surgical quality improvement program (NSQIP) database. Babayan RK J Urol; 2014 May; 191(5):1289. PubMed ID: 24745489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic compared with open prostatectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Liu JJ; Maxwell BG; Panousis P; Chung BI Urology; 2013 Sep; 82(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 23876584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications. Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of transfusion requirements between open and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Carmignani L; Pavesi M; Picozzi S BJU Int; 2011 Mar; 107(5):853-854. PubMed ID: 21355986 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Australian laparoscopic non robotic radical prostatectomy experience - analysis of 2943 cases (USANZ supplement). Louie-Johnsun MW; Handmer MM; Calopedos RJ; Chabert C; Cohen RJ; Gianduzzo TR; Kearns PA; Moon DA; Ooi J; Shannon T; Sofield D; Tan AH BJU Int; 2016 Oct; 118 Suppl 3():43-48. PubMed ID: 27659257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perioperative complications after radical prostatectomy: open versus robot-assisted laparoscopic approach. Froehner M; Novotny V; Koch R; Leike S; Twelker L; Wirth MP Urol Int; 2013; 90(3):312-5. PubMed ID: 23485928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparisons of perioperative outcomes and costs between open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a propensity-score matching analysis based on the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. Sugihara T; Yasunaga H; Horiguchi H; Tsuru N; Ihara H; Fujimura T; Nishimatsu H; Ohe K; Fushimi K; Homma Y Int J Urol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 23320826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: how does it compare with other surgical approaches? Lim SK; Kim KH; Shin TY; Rha KH Int J Urol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):271-84. PubMed ID: 23106163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic, laparoscopic, and open colectomy: a case-matched comparison from the ACS-NSQIP. Benlice C; Aytac E; Costedio M; Kessler H; Abbas MA; Remzi FH; Gorgun E Int J Med Robot; 2017 Sep; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 27766727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostatectomy for benign prostate disease: open, laparoscopic and robotic techniques. Ferretti M; Phillips J Can J Urol; 2015 Oct; 22 Suppl 1():60-6. PubMed ID: 26497345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: an Australian single-surgeon series. Papachristos A; Basto M; Te Marvelde L; Moon D ANZ J Surg; 2015 Mar; 85(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 24730750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. Bhama AR; Obias V; Welch KB; Vandewarker JF; Cleary RK Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1576-84. PubMed ID: 26169638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radical prostatectomy by open or laparoscopic/robotic techniques: an issue of surgical device or surgical expertise? Blute ML J Clin Oncol; 2008 May; 26(14):2248-9. PubMed ID: 18467714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A laparoscopic approach reduces short-term complications and length of stay following ileocolic resection in Crohn's disease: an analysis of outcomes from the NSQIP database. Lee Y; Fleming FJ; Deeb AP; Gunzler D; Messing S; Monson JR Colorectal Dis; 2012 May; 14(5):572-7. PubMed ID: 21831174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of transfusion requirements between open and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Kordan Y; Barocas DA; Altamar HO; Clark PE; Chang SS; Davis R; Herrell SD; Baumgartner R; Mishra V; Chan RC; Smith JA; Cookson MS BJU Int; 2010 Oct; 106(7):1036-40. PubMed ID: 20151960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patterns-of-care and health economic analysis of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Australian public health system. Basto M; Sathianathen N; Te Marvelde L; Ryan S; Goad J; Lawrentschuk N; Costello AJ; Moon DA; Heriot AG; Butler J; Murphy DG BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):930-9. PubMed ID: 26350758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Trabulsi EJ; Zola JC; Colon-Herdman A; Heckman JE; Gomella LG; Lallas CD Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Oct; 64(8):823-9. PubMed ID: 22052763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study. Akand M; Erdogru T; Avci E; Ates M Int J Urol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):916-21. PubMed ID: 26212891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intravesical Hemostatic Clip Migration After Robotic Prostatectomy: Case Series and Review of the Literature. Turini GA; Brito JM; Leone AR; Golijanin D; Miller EB; Pareek G; Renzulli JF J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Sep; 26(9):710-2. PubMed ID: 27362898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]