These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24745598)

  • 1. Second Class Resolver: a retrospective analysis.
    D'Attilio M; Rodolfino D; Filippakos A; Saccucci M; Festa F; Tripodi D
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2014 Mar; 15(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 24745598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Third Class Resolver: a retrospective analysis.
    D'Attilio M; Festa F; Filippakos A; Comparelli U; Tripodi D
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2014 Sep; 15(3):323-5. PubMed ID: 25306153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Burhan AS; Nawaya FR
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh R; Amiri SS
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 20956385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment effects of R-appliance and Fränkel-2 in Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Showkatbakhsh R; Castaldo MI; Jamilian A; Padricelli G; Fahimi Hanzayi M; Cappabianca S; Perillo L
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Mar; 14(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 23597214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanisms of Class II correction induced by the crown Herbst appliance as a single-phase Class II therapy: 1 year follow-up.
    Jakobsone G; Latkauskiene D; McNamara JA
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14():27. PubMed ID: 24326090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions.
    Hanandeh BA; El-Bialy AA
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(4):13-24. PubMed ID: 21314084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment effects of a fixed intermaxillary device to correct class II malocclusions in growing patients.
    Heinrichs DA; Shammaa I; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):45. PubMed ID: 25138988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stepwise advancement Herbst appliance versus mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Treatment effects and long-term stability of adult Class II patients.
    Chaiyongsirisern A; Rabie AB; Wong RW
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1084-94. PubMed ID: 19852598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Skeletal stability of patients undergoing maxillomandibular advancement for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.
    Lee SH; Kaban LB; Lahey ET
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 73(4):694-700. PubMed ID: 25622883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The efficacy of Hybrid Hyrax-Mentoplate combination in early Class III treatment: a novel approach and pilot study.
    Katyal V; Wilmes B; Nienkemper M; Darendeliler MA; Sampson W; Drescher D
    Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 27468596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cephalometric study to test the reliability of anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy indicators using the twin block appliance.
    Trivedi R; Bhattacharya A; Mehta F; Patel D; Parekh H; Gandhi V
    Prog Orthod; 2015 Feb; 16():3. PubMed ID: 25769138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of mandibular tongue cribs on dentoskeletal changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusions.
    Meibodi SE; Meybodi SA; Meybodi EM
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 20209173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Pilot Study on the Dentoalveolar and Skeletal Effects of Two Functional Appliances in Class II, Division 1 Growing Children.
    Chen H; Yagi K; Almeida FR; Pliska BT; Lowe AA
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2015; 26(2):15-20. PubMed ID: 26349284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An assessment of late fixed functional treatment and the stability of Forsus appliance effects.
    Gao W; Li X; Bai Y
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 24968640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relapse of orthodontically corrected deepbites in accordance with growth pattern.
    Pollard D; Akyalcin S; Wiltshire WA; Rody WJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):477-83. PubMed ID: 22464530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in mandibular position in treated Class II division 2 malocclusions in growing and non-growing subjects.
    AL-Nimri K; Abo-Zomor M; Alomari S
    Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 27468594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.