These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24745629)

  • 1. Reproducibility of maxillofacial landmark identification on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images of patients with mandibular prognathism: Comparative study of a tentative method and traditional cephalometric analysis.
    Fuyamada M; Shibata M; Nawa H; Yoshida K; Kise Y; Katsumata A; Ariji E; Goto S
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):966-73. PubMed ID: 24745629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproducibility of three-dimensional coordinate systems based on craniofacial landmarks: a tentative evaluation of four systems created on images obtained by cone-beam computed tomography with a large field of view.
    Shibata M; Nawa H; Kise Y; Fuyamada M; Yoshida K; Katsumata A; Ariji E; Goto S
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):776-84. PubMed ID: 22348241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproducibility of landmark identification in the jaw and teeth on 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Fuyamada M; Nawa H; Shibata M; Yoshida K; Kise Y; Katsumata A; Ariji E; Goto S
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Sep; 81(5):843-9. PubMed ID: 21568647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of cephalometric landmark identification on CBCT multiplanar and 3D reconstructions.
    Neiva MB; Soares ÁC; Lisboa Cde O; Vilella Ode V; Motta AT
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 24713068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.
    Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new mandible-specific landmark reference system for three-dimensional cephalometry using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Pittayapat P; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM; Odri GA; Kwon MS; Lambrichts I; Willems G; Politis C; Olszewski R
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Dec; 38(6):563-568. PubMed ID: 26683131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of anatomic structures as landmarks in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis using CBCT.
    Naji P; Alsufyani NA; Lagravère MO
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):762-72. PubMed ID: 24364751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer-aided cephalometric landmark annotation for CBCT data.
    Codari M; Caffini M; Tartaglia GM; Sforza C; Baselli G
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Jan; 12(1):113-121. PubMed ID: 27358080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Precision of identifying cephalometric landmarks with cone beam computed tomography in vivo.
    Hassan B; Nijkamp P; Verheij H; Tairie J; Vink C; van der Stelt P; van Beek H
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 21447781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Newly defined landmarks for a three-dimensionally based cephalometric analysis: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography scan review.
    Lee M; Kanavakis G; Miner RM
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 24866835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiobjective optimization framework for landmark measurement error correction in three-dimensional cephalometric tomography.
    DeCesare A; Secanell M; Lagravère MO; Carey J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20130035. PubMed ID: 23640988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography.
    Olszewski R; Frison L; Wisniewski M; Denis JM; Vynckier S; Cosnard G; Zech F; Reychler H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):285-92. PubMed ID: 22350037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cephalometric and three-dimensional assessment of the posterior airway space and imaging software reliability analysis before and after orthognathic surgery.
    Burkhard JP; Dietrich AD; Jacobsen C; Roos M; Lübbers HT; Obwegeser JA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1428-36. PubMed ID: 24864074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i-CAT cone beam CT.
    Katkar RA; Kummet C; Dawson D; Moreno Uribe L; Allareddy V; Finkelstein M; Ruprecht A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130059. PubMed ID: 23833319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of maxillofacial anatomic landmarks on 3-dimensional computed tomographic images determined with the 95% confidence ellipse method.
    Muramatsu A; Nawa H; Kimura M; Yoshida K; Maeda M; Katsumata A; Ariji E; Goto S
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 18416622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review.
    Lisboa Cde O; Masterson D; da Motta AF; Motta AT
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 26018303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular condyle position in patients with deviated mandibular prognathism.
    Lee JS; Xi T; Kwon TG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Aug; 46(8):1052-1058. PubMed ID: 28302336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views.
    Ludlow JB; Gubler M; Cevidanes L; Mol A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):312.e1-10; discussion 312-3. PubMed ID: 19732656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Precision of manual landmark identification between as-received and oriented volume-rendered cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Balachandran R; Sardana V; Kalra S; Chaurasia S; Sardana HK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):118-131. PubMed ID: 28024764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.