These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24746123)

  • 1. Assessment of hand kinematics using inertial and magnetic sensors.
    Kortier HG; Sluiter VI; Roetenberg D; Veltink PH
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Apr; 11():70. PubMed ID: 24746123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring 3D Hand and Finger Kinematics-A Comparison between Inertial Sensing and an Opto-Electronic Marker System.
    van den Noort JC; Kortier HG; van Beek N; Veeger DH; Veltink PH
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0164889. PubMed ID: 27812139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An instrumented glove for monitoring hand function.
    Mohan A; Tharion G; Kumar RK; Devasahayam SR
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2018 Oct; 89(10):105001. PubMed ID: 30399736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hand Pose Estimation by Fusion of Inertial and Magnetic Sensing Aided by a Permanent Magnet.
    Kortier HG; Antonsson J; Schepers HM; Gustafsson F; Veltink PH
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2015 Sep; 23(5):796-806. PubMed ID: 25222952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ambulatory human motion tracking by fusion of inertial and magnetic sensing with adaptive actuation.
    Schepers HM; Roetenberg D; Veltink PH
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2010 Jan; 48(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 20016949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 25 years of lower limb joint kinematics by using inertial and magnetic sensors: A review of methodological approaches.
    Picerno P
    Gait Posture; 2017 Jan; 51():239-246. PubMed ID: 27833057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A marker-based approach to determine the centers of rotation of finger joints.
    Lapresa M; Guglielmelli E; Zollo L; Cordella F
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2024 Apr; 246():108055. PubMed ID: 38320368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Two-Axis Goniometric Sensor for Tracking Finger Motion.
    Wang L; Meydan T; Williams PI
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Apr; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 28379170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robust identification of three-dimensional thumb and index finger kinematics with a minimal set of markers.
    Nataraj R; Li ZM
    J Biomech Eng; 2013 Sep; 135(9):91002. PubMed ID: 23775305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inertial measurement systems for segments and joints kinematics assessment: towards an understanding of the variations in sensors accuracy.
    Lebel K; Boissy P; Nguyen H; Duval C
    Biomed Eng Online; 2017 May; 16(1):56. PubMed ID: 28506273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of dominant hand range of motion among throwing types in baseball pitchers.
    Wang LH; Kuo LC; Shih SW; Lo KC; Su FC
    Hum Mov Sci; 2013 Aug; 32(4):719-29. PubMed ID: 23764035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploiting wearable goniometer technology for motion sensing gloves.
    Carbonaro N; Dalle Mura G; Lorussi F; Paradiso R; De Rossi D; Tognetti A
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2014 Nov; 18(6):1788-95. PubMed ID: 24835230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ambulatory measurement of shoulder and elbow kinematics through inertial and magnetic sensors.
    Cutti AG; Giovanardi A; Rocchi L; Davalli A; Sacchetti R
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2008 Feb; 46(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 18087742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation into reducing anthropomorphic hand degrees of freedom while maintaining human hand grasping functions.
    Zarzoura M; Del Moral P; Awad MI; Tolbah FA
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2019 Feb; 233(2):279-292. PubMed ID: 30599790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional range of motion in the upper extremity and trunk joints: Nine functional everyday tasks with inertial sensors.
    Doğan M; Koçak M; Onursal Kılınç Ö; Ayvat F; Sütçü G; Ayvat E; Kılınç M; Ünver Ö; Aksu Yıldırım S
    Gait Posture; 2019 May; 70():141-147. PubMed ID: 30875600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A bi-articular model for scapular-humeral rhythm reconstruction through data from wearable sensors.
    Lorussi F; Carbonaro N; De Rossi D; Tognetti A
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 13():40. PubMed ID: 27107970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving Data Glove Accuracy and Usability Using a Neural Network When Measuring Finger Joint Range of Motion.
    Connolly J; Condell J; Curran K; Gardiner P
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Mar; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 35336401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Miniature low-power inertial sensors: promising technology for implantable motion capture systems.
    Lambrecht JM; Kirsch RF
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Nov; 22(6):1138-47. PubMed ID: 24846651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of gait kinematics and kinetics from inertial sensor data using optimal control of musculoskeletal models.
    Dorschky E; Nitschke M; Seifer AK; van den Bogert AJ; Eskofier BM
    J Biomech; 2019 Oct; 95():109278. PubMed ID: 31472970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving Kinematic Accuracy of Soft Wearable Data Gloves by Optimizing Sensor Locations.
    Kim DH; Lee SW; Park HS
    Sensors (Basel); 2016 May; 16(6):. PubMed ID: 27240364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.