982 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24746124)
1. Invited review: Enteric methane in dairy cattle production: quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions.
Knapp JR; Laur GL; Vadas PA; Weiss WP; Tricarico JM
J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3231-61. PubMed ID: 24746124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Special topics--Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: III. A review of animal management mitigation options.
Hristov AN; Ott T; Tricarico J; Rotz A; Waghorn G; Adesogan A; Dijkstra J; Montes F; Oh J; Kebreab E; Oosting SJ; Gerber PJ; Henderson B; Makkar HP; Firkins JL
J Anim Sci; 2013 Nov; 91(11):5095-113. PubMed ID: 24045470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Special topics--Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options.
Hristov AN; Oh J; Firkins JL; Dijkstra J; Kebreab E; Waghorn G; Makkar HP; Adesogan AT; Yang W; Lee C; Gerber PJ; Henderson B; Tricarico JM
J Anim Sci; 2013 Nov; 91(11):5045-69. PubMed ID: 24045497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of feeding strategies and cropping systems on greenhouse gas emission from Wisconsin certified organic dairy farms.
Liang D; Sun F; Wattiaux MA; Cabrera VE; Hedtcke JL; Silva EM
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jul; 100(7):5957-5973. PubMed ID: 28501399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Review: Fifty years of research on rumen methanogenesis: lessons learned and future challenges for mitigation.
Beauchemin KA; Ungerfeld EM; Eckard RJ; Wang M
Animal; 2020 Mar; 14(S1):s2-s16. PubMed ID: 32024560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of concentrate feed level on methane emissions from grazing dairy cows.
Jiao HP; Dale AJ; Carson AF; Murray S; Gordon AW; Ferris CP
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Nov; 97(11):7043-53. PubMed ID: 25173463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feeding strategies and manure management for cost-effective mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from dairy farms in Wisconsin.
Dutreuil M; Wattiaux M; Hardie CA; Cabrera VE
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Sep; 97(9):5904-17. PubMed ID: 24996278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of improved performance in the U.S. dairy cattle industry on environmental impacts between 2007 and 2017.
Capper JL; Cady RA
J Anim Sci; 2020 Jan; 98(1):. PubMed ID: 31622980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Invited review: Advances in nutrition and feed additives to mitigate enteric methane emissions.
Hristov AN
J Dairy Sci; 2024 Jul; 107(7):4129-4146. PubMed ID: 38942560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Technical options for the mitigation of direct methane and nitrous oxide emissions from livestock: a review.
Gerber PJ; Hristov AN; Henderson B; Makkar H; Oh J; Lee C; Meinen R; Montes F; Ott T; Firkins J; Rotz A; Dell C; Adesogan AT; Yang WZ; Tricarico JM; Kebreab E; Waghorn G; Dijkstra J; Oosting S
Animal; 2013 Jun; 7 Suppl 2():220-34. PubMed ID: 23739465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Greenhouse gas, water, and land footprint per unit of production of the California dairy industry over 50 years.
Naranjo A; Johnson A; Rossow H; Kebreab E
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Apr; 103(4):3760-3773. PubMed ID: 32037166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of feed-related farm characteristics on relative values of genetic traits in dairy cows to reduce greenhouse gas emissions along the chain.
Van Middelaar CE; Berentsen PB; Dijkstra J; Van Arendonk JA; De Boer IJ
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4889-903. PubMed ID: 25912865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Herd-level versus animal-level variation in methane emission prediction in grazing dairy cattle.
Zhang X; Amer PR; Stachowicz K; Quinton C; Crowley J
Animal; 2021 Sep; 15(9):100325. PubMed ID: 34371470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating the impact of clinical mastitis in dairy cows on greenhouse gas emissions using a dynamic stochastic simulation model: a case study.
Mostert PF; Bokkers EAM; de Boer IJM; van Middelaar CE
Animal; 2019 Dec; 13(12):2913-2921. PubMed ID: 31210122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Review: Selecting for improved feed efficiency and reduced methane emissions in dairy cattle.
Løvendahl P; Difford GF; Li B; Chagunda MGG; Huhtanen P; Lidauer MH; Lassen J; Lund P
Animal; 2018 Dec; 12(s2):s336-s349. PubMed ID: 30255826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Review: Strategies for enteric methane mitigation in cattle fed tropical forages.
Ku-Vera JC; Castelán-Ortega OA; Galindo-Maldonado FA; Arango J; Chirinda N; Jiménez-Ocampo R; Valencia-Salazar SS; Flores-Santiago EJ; Montoya-Flores MD; Molina-Botero IC; Piñeiro-Vázquez AT; Arceo-Castillo JI; Aguilar-Pérez CF; Ramírez-Avilés L; Solorio-Sánchez FJ
Animal; 2020 Sep; 14(S3):s453-s463. PubMed ID: 32807248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of feeding strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from dairy farming.
Van Middelaar CE; Dijkstra J; Berentsen PB; De Boer IJ
J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(4):2427-39. PubMed ID: 24485690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantifying the Impact of Different Dietary Rumen Modulating Strategies on Enteric Methane Emission and Productivity in Ruminant Livestock: A Meta-Analysis.
Pepeta BN; Hassen A; Tesfamariam EH
Animals (Basel); 2024 Feb; 14(5):. PubMed ID: 38473148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Heritability estimates for enteric methane emissions from Holstein cattle measured using noninvasive methods.
Lassen J; Løvendahl P
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):1959-1967. PubMed ID: 26805978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of subclinical mastitis on greenhouse gas emissions intensity and profitability of dairy cows in Norway.
Özkan Gülzari Ş; Vosough Ahmadi B; Stott AW
Prev Vet Med; 2018 Feb; 150():19-29. PubMed ID: 29406080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
