BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24746598)

  • 1. Operator learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program in contemporary US practice.
    Barbash IM; Minha S; Gallino R; Lager R; Badr S; Loh JP; Kitabata H; Pendyala LK; Torguson R; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 24746598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Full conversion from transfemoral to transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions results in a similar success rate and a rapid reduction of in-hospital cardiac and vascular major events.
    Dangoisse V; Guédès A; Gabriel L; Jamart J; Chenu P; Marchandise B; Schroeder E
    EuroIntervention; 2013 Jul; 9(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 23872649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery via transradial approach feasible for skilled transfemoral operators? Initial experience in an unselected population.
    Tomassini F; Gagnor A; Montali N; Gambino A; Bollati M; Infantino V; Tizzani E; Varbella F
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2013; 14(4):193-6. PubMed ID: 23768506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative Efficacy of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Schussler JM; Vasudevan A; von Bose LJ; Won JI; McCullough PA
    Am J Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 118(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 27378143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty - A prospective, randomized comparison.
    Bhat FA; Changal KH; Raina H; Tramboo NA; Rather HA
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28077091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Dahal K; Rijal J; Lee J; Korr KS; Azrin M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):857-65. PubMed ID: 26332022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association of radial versus femoral access with contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
    Kolte D; Spence N; Puthawala M; Hyder O; Tuohy CP; Davidson CB; Sheldon MW; Laskey WK; Abbott JD
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):546-551. PubMed ID: 27566903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of Access Site on Bleeding and Ischemic Events in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Prasugrel: The ACCOAST Access Substudy.
    Porto I; Bolognese L; Dudek D; Goldstein P; Hamm C; Tanguay JF; Ten Berg J; Widimský P; Le Gall N; Zagar AJ; LeNarz LA; Miller D; Montalescot G;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 9(9):897-907. PubMed ID: 27151605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transfemoral approach with systematic use of FemoSeal™ closure device compared to transradial approach in primary angioplasty.
    Alonzo A; Rigattieri S; Giovannelli F; Di Russo C; Sciahbasi A; Berni A; Volpe M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):849-54. PubMed ID: 26104978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transradial access in a cath lab with moderate procedural volume: a single operator's experience.
    Rigattieri S; Ferraiuolo G; Loschiavo P
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2007 Jun; 55(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 17534248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention).
    Michael TT; Alomar M; Papayannis A; Mogabgab O; Patel VG; Rangan BV; Luna M; Hastings JL; Grodin J; Abdullah S; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1138-44. PubMed ID: 24139930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experience and complications associated with use of guide extension catheters in percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Waterbury TM; Sorajja P; Bell MR; Lennon RJ; Mathew V; Singh M; Sandhu GS; Gulati R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Dec; 88(7):1057-1065. PubMed ID: 26698371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure comparing transradial and transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary procedures: rationale and design of the minimizing adverse haemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic implementation of angioX - RAdiation Dose study (RAD-MATRIX).
    Sciahbasi A; Calabrò P; Sarandrea A; Rigattieri S; Tomassini F; Sardella G; Zavalloni D; Cortese B; Limbruno U; Tebaldi M; Gagnor A; Rubartelli P; Zingarelli A; Valgimigli M
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 24746599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Left main percutaneous coronary intervention-Radial versus femoral access: A systematic analysis.
    Goel S; Pasam RT; Raheja H; Gotesman J; Gidwani U; Ahuja KR; Reed G; Puri R; Khatri JK; Kapadia SR
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 95(7):E201-E213. PubMed ID: 31430040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice?
    Mamas MA; Ratib K; Routledge H; Neyses L; Fraser DG; de Belder M; Ludman PF; Nolan J;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 6(7):698-706. PubMed ID: 23769648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Current State of Radial Artery Catheterization in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
    Hinohara TT; Rao SV
    Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2015; 58(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 26206109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Bajaj A; Pancholy S; Sothwal A; Nawaz Y; Boruah P
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Sep; 20(9):790-798. PubMed ID: 30442537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of vascular approach (transradial vs. transfemoral) on the efficacy of thrombus aspiration in acute myocardial infarction patients.
    Sciahbasi A; Burzotta F; Rigattieri S; Pendenza G; Romagnoli E; Trani C; Loschiavo P; Penco M; Lioy E
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2012; 13(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 22226170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of transradial and transfemoral access in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for complex coronary lesions.
    Koifman E; Gaglia MA; Escarcega RO; Bernardo NL; Lager RA; Gallino RA; Ben-Dor I; Pichard AD; Baker NC; Lipinski MJ; Kiramijyan S; Negi SI; Torguson R; Gai J; Suddath WO; Satler LF; Waksman R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 89(4):640-646. PubMed ID: 27860277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of Access Site Practice on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following Thrombolysis for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United Kingdom: An Insight From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Dataset.
    Rashid M; Rushton CA; Kwok CS; Kinnaird T; Kontopantelis E; Olier I; Ludman P; De Belder MA; Nolan J; Mamas MA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 10(22):2258-2265. PubMed ID: 29169494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 64.