BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24746655)

  • 1. Radiation dose reduction in the cardiac catheterization laboratory utilizing a novel protocol.
    Wassef AW; Hiebert B; Ravandi A; Ducas J; Minhas K; Vo M; Kass M; Parmar G; Hussain F
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):550-7. PubMed ID: 24746655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of low rate fluoroscopy at reducing operator and patient radiation dose during transradial coronary angiography and interventions.
    Abdelaal E; Plourde G; MacHaalany J; Arsenault J; Rimac G; Déry JP; Barbeau G; Larose E; De Larochellière R; Nguyen CM; Allende R; Ribeiro H; Costerousse O; Mongrain R; Bertrand OF;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):567-74. PubMed ID: 24746649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient radiation dose reduction using an X-ray imaging noise reduction technology for cardiac angiography and intervention.
    Nakamura S; Kobayashi T; Funatsu A; Okada T; Mauti M; Waizumi Y; Yamada S
    Heart Vessels; 2016 May; 31(5):655-63. PubMed ID: 25840815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Image noise reduction technology reduces radiation in a radial-first cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    Gunja A; Pandey Y; Xie H; Wolska BM; Shroff AR; Ardati AK; Vidovich MI
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017; 18(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 28089778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of the implementation of a simple radiation reduction protocol in the catheterization laboratory.
    Jurado-Román A; Sánchez-Pérez I; Lozano Ruíz-Poveda F; López-Lluva MT; Pinilla-Echeverri N; Moreno Arciniegas A; Agudo-Quilez P; Gil Agudo A
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016; 17(5):328-32. PubMed ID: 27085219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient radiation exposure in right versus left trans-radial approach for coronary procedures.
    Rigattieri S; Di Russo C; Cera M; Fedele S; Sciahbasi A; Pugliese FR
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2015; 16(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 25576274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient exposure to X-rays during coronary angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention: results of a multicenter national survey.
    Georges JL; Belle L; Ricard C; Cattan S; Albert F; Hirsch JL; Monsegu J; Dibie A; Khalife K; Caussin C; Maccia C; Livarek B; Hanssen M;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Apr; 83(5):729-38. PubMed ID: 24323486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship of beam angulation and radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    Agarwal S; Parashar A; Bajaj NS; Khan I; Ahmad I; Heupler FA; Bunte M; Modi DK; Tuzcu EM; Kapadia SR
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):558-66. PubMed ID: 24746652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention is associated with lower patient radiation exposure in high-radial-volume centres: Insights from the RAY'ACT-1 study.
    Georges JL; Belle L; Meunier L; Dechery T; Khalifé K; Pecheux M; Elhaddad S; Amabile N; Pansieri M; Ballout J; Marchand X; Rouault G; Leddet P; Nugue O; Lucke N; Cattan S;
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2017 Mar; 110(3):179-187. PubMed ID: 28117244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Radiation Dose Reduction Technology to Improve Patient Safety During Cardiac Catheterization Interventions.
    Bracken JA; Mauti M; Kim MS; Messenger JC; Carroll JD
    J Interv Cardiol; 2015 Oct; 28(5):493-7. PubMed ID: 26381865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implementation of a Low Frame-Rate Protocol and Noise-Reduction Technology to Minimize Radiation Dose in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Maccagni D; Candilio L; Latib A; Godino C; Chieffo A; Montorfano M; Colombo A; Azzalini L
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 May; 30(5):169-175. PubMed ID: 29715165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimizing exposure to radiation in invasive cardiology using modern dose-reduction technology: Evaluation of the real-life effects.
    Faroux L; Blanpain T; Nazeyrollas P; Tassan-Mangina S; Herce B; Tourneux C; Metz D
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 91(7):1194-1199. PubMed ID: 28862392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of a real-time radiation monitoring device on operator radiation exposure during cardiac catheterization: the radiation reduction during cardiac catheterization using real-time monitoring study.
    Christopoulos G; Papayannis AC; Alomar M; Kotsia A; Michael TT; Rangan BV; Roesle M; Shorrock D; Makke L; Layne R; Grabarkewitz R; Haagen D; Maragkoudakis S; Mohammad A; Sarode K; Cipher DJ; Chambers CE; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Dec; 7(6):744-50. PubMed ID: 25423958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized study comparing the use of a pelvic lead shield during trans-radial interventions: Threefold decrease in radiation to the operator but double exposure to the patient.
    Musallam A; Volis I; Dadaev S; Abergel E; Soni A; Yalonetsky S; Kerner A; Roguin A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jun; 85(7):1164-70. PubMed ID: 25510441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reduction of scatter radiation during transradial percutaneous coronary angiography: a randomized trial using a lead-free radiation shield.
    Politi L; Biondi-Zoccai G; Nocetti L; Costi T; Monopoli D; Rossi R; Sgura F; Modena MG; Sangiorgi GM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jan; 79(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 21520391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reduction of operator radiation dose by a pelvic lead shield during cardiac catheterization by radial access: comparison with femoral access.
    Lange HW; von Boetticher H
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Apr; 5(4):445-9. PubMed ID: 22516403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pediatric patient radiation dosage during endomyocardial biopsies and right heart catheterization using a standard "ALARA" radiation reduction protocol in the modern fluoroscopic era.
    Sutton NJ; Lamour J; Gellis LA; Pass RH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 83(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 23765986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure comparing transradial and transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary procedures: rationale and design of the minimizing adverse haemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic implementation of angioX - RAdiation Dose study (RAD-MATRIX).
    Sciahbasi A; Calabrò P; Sarandrea A; Rigattieri S; Tomassini F; Sardella G; Zavalloni D; Cortese B; Limbruno U; Tebaldi M; Gagnor A; Rubartelli P; Zingarelli A; Valgimigli M
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 24746599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fluoroscopy pulse rate reduction during diagnostic and therapeutic imaging in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: An evaluation of radiation dose, procedure complications and outcomes.
    Hansen JW; Foy A; Schmidt T; Ghahramani M; Chambers CE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 89(4):665-670. PubMed ID: 27121130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reducing radiation exposure during invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions implementing a simple four-step protocol.
    Seiffert M; Ojeda F; Müllerleile K; Zengin E; Sinning C; Waldeyer C; Lubos E; Schäfer U; Sydow K; Blankenberg S; Westermann D
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2015 Jun; 104(6):500-6. PubMed ID: 25608615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.