These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24747109)

  • 1. Reprint of "Influence of analytical bias and imprecision on the number of false positive results using Guideline-Driven Medical Decision Limits".
    Hyltoft Petersen P; Klee GG
    Clin Chim Acta; 2014 May; 432():127-34. PubMed ID: 24747109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of analytical bias and imprecision on the number of false positive results using Guideline-Driven Medical Decision Limits.
    Hyltoft Petersen P; Klee GG
    Clin Chim Acta; 2014 Mar; 430():1-8. PubMed ID: 24362233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new concept to derive permissible limits for analytical imprecision and bias considering diagnostic requirements and technical state-of-the-art.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Apr; 49(4):623-35. PubMed ID: 21345158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discordance rate, a new concept for combining diagnostic decisions with analytical performance characteristics. 1. Application in method or sample system comparisons and in defining decision limits.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W; Puentmann I
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Mar; 41(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 12705345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analytical performance, reference values and decision limits. A need to differentiate between reference intervals and decision limits and to define analytical quality specifications.
    Petersen PH; Jensen EA; Brandslund I
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Dec; 50(5):819-31. PubMed ID: 22628319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The discordance rate, a new concept for combining diagnostic decisions with analytical performance characteristics. 2. Defining analytical goals applied to the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes by blood glucose concentrations.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004 Feb; 42(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 15061361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality specifications for biochemical markers of myocardial injury.
    Zaninotto M; Mion M; Altinier S; Forni M; Plebani M
    Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Aug; 346(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 15234637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do new concepts for deriving permissible limits for analytical imprecision and bias have any advantages over existing consensus?
    Petersen PH; Sandberg S; Fraser CG
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Apr; 49(4):637-40. PubMed ID: 21345044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combination of analytical quality specifications based on biological within- and between-subject variation.
    Petersen PH; Fraser CG; Jørgensen L; Brandslund I; Stahl M; Gowans E; Libeer JC; Ricós C
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2002 Nov; 39(Pt 6):543-50. PubMed ID: 12564835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can current analytical quality performance of UK clinical laboratories support evidence-based guidelines for diabetes and ischaemic heart disease?--A pilot study and a proposal.
    Jassam N; Yundt-Pacheco J; Jansen R; Thomas A; Barth JH
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2013 Aug; 51(8):1579-84. PubMed ID: 23525878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of analytical bias on diagnostic misclassifications.
    Petersen PH; de Verdier CH; Groth T; Fraser CG; Blaabjerg O; Hørder M
    Clin Chim Acta; 1997 Apr; 260(2):189-206. PubMed ID: 9177913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simple matrix of analytical performance to identify assays that risk patients using External Quality Assurance Program data.
    Mackay M; Hegedus G; Badrick T
    Clin Biochem; 2016 May; 49(7-8):596-600. PubMed ID: 26800780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance criteria based on true and false classification and clinical outcomes. Influence of analytical performance on diagnostic outcome using a single clinical component.
    Petersen PH
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 May; 53(6):849-55. PubMed ID: 25883201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Quality assurance of analytical methods to guarantee the reliability of medical decision levels for interpretation of clinical laboratory data].
    Hosogaya S; Ozaki Y
    Rinsho Byori; 2004 Jun; 52(6):548-51. PubMed ID: 15283171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What information on quality specifications should be communicated to clinicians, and how?
    Plebani M
    Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Aug; 346(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 15234633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The quality of laboratory aspects of troponin testing in clinical practice guidelines and consensus documents needs to be improved.
    Aakre KM; Langlois MR; Barth JH; Misra S; Watine J; Oosterhuis WP
    Clin Chim Acta; 2014 Nov; 437():58-61. PubMed ID: 25036763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analytical performance specifications for changes in assay bias (Δbias) for data with logarithmic distributions as assessed by effects on reference change values.
    Petersen PH; Lund F; Fraser CG; Sölétormos G
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2016 Nov; 53(6):686-691. PubMed ID: 27147623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analytical quality specifications for common reference intervals.
    Ricós C; Doménech MV; Perich C
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004; 42(7):858-62. PubMed ID: 15327023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analytical performance specifications for external quality assessment - definitions and descriptions.
    Jones GRD; Albarede S; Kesseler D; MacKenzie F; Mammen J; Pedersen M; Stavelin A; Thelen M; Thomas A; Twomey PJ; Ventura E; Panteghini M;
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Jun; 55(7):949-955. PubMed ID: 28593915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Valid analytical performance specifications for combined analytical bias and imprecision for the use of common reference intervals.
    Hyltoft Petersen P; Lund F; Fraser CG; Sandberg S; Sölétormos G
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2018 Sep; 55(5):612-615. PubMed ID: 29310466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.