215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24747141)
1. Spatial and temporal evolution of organic foulant layers on reverse osmosis membranes in wastewater reuse applications.
Farias EL; Howe KJ; Thomson BM
Water Res; 2014 Jul; 58():102-10. PubMed ID: 24747141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of membrane bioreactor solids retention time on reverse osmosis membrane fouling for wastewater reuse.
Farias EL; Howe KJ; Thomson BM
Water Res; 2014 Feb; 49():53-61. PubMed ID: 24316181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterisation of RO fouling in an integrated MBR/RO system for wastewater reuse.
Moreno J; Monclús H; Stefani M; Cortada E; Aumatell J; Adroer N; De Lamo-Castellví S; Comas J
Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(4):780-8. PubMed ID: 23306255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Life cycle cost of a hybrid forward osmosis - low pressure reverse osmosis system for seawater desalination and wastewater recovery.
Valladares Linares R; Li Z; Yangali-Quintanilla V; Ghaffour N; Amy G; Leiknes T; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res; 2016 Jan; 88():225-234. PubMed ID: 26512800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biofouling of reverse-osmosis membranes during tertiary wastewater desalination: microbial community composition.
Al Ashhab A; Herzberg M; Gillor O
Water Res; 2014 Mar; 50():341-9. PubMed ID: 24231030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Osmotic versus conventional membrane bioreactors integrated with reverse osmosis for water reuse: Biological stability, membrane fouling, and contaminant removal.
Luo W; Phan HV; Xie M; Hai FI; Price WE; Elimelech M; Nghiem LD
Water Res; 2017 Feb; 109():122-134. PubMed ID: 27883917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of spacer thickness on biofouling in forward osmosis.
Valladares Linares R; Bucs SS; Li Z; AbuGhdeeb M; Amy G; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res; 2014 Jun; 57():223-33. PubMed ID: 24726992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fouling characteristics of reverse osmosis membranes at different positions of a full-scale plant for municipal wastewater reclamation.
Tang F; Hu HY; Sun LJ; Sun YX; Shi N; Crittenden JC
Water Res; 2016 Mar; 90():329-336. PubMed ID: 26760485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dyeing wastewater effluent treatment.
Myung SW; Choi IH; Lee SH; Kim IC; Lee KH
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):159-64. PubMed ID: 16003974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Smart ultrafiltration membrane fouling control as desalination pretreatment of shale gas fracturing wastewater: The effects of backwash water.
Chang H; Li T; Liu B; Chen C; He Q; Crittenden JC
Environ Int; 2019 Sep; 130():104869. PubMed ID: 31228783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up.
D'Haese A; Le-Clech P; Van Nevel S; Verbeken K; Cornelissen ER; Khan SJ; Verliefde AR
Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(14):5232-44. PubMed ID: 23866149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combined coagulation-disk filtration process as a pretreatment of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane for wastewater reclamation: an autopsy study of a pilot plant.
Chon K; Kim SJ; Moon J; Cho J
Water Res; 2012 Apr; 46(6):1803-16. PubMed ID: 22310806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How different is the composition of the fouling layer of wastewater reuse and seawater desalination RO membranes?
Khan MT; Busch M; Molina VG; Emwas AH; Aubry C; Croue JP
Water Res; 2014 Aug; 59():271-82. PubMed ID: 24810743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integration of an anaerobic fluidized-bed membrane bioreactor (MBR) with zeolite adsorption and reverse osmosis (RO) for municipal wastewater reclamation: Comparison with an anoxic-aerobic MBR coupled with RO.
Li Y; Sim LN; Ho JS; Chong TH; Wu B; Liu Y
Chemosphere; 2020 Apr; 245():125569. PubMed ID: 31864040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The feasibility of nanofiltration membrane bioreactor (NF-MBR)+reverse osmosis (RO) process for water reclamation: Comparison with ultrafiltration membrane bioreactor (UF-MBR)+RO process.
Tay MF; Liu C; Cornelissen ER; Wu B; Chong TH
Water Res; 2018 Feb; 129():180-189. PubMed ID: 29149673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of chlorine disinfection on the membrane fouling potential of bacterial strains isolated from fouled reverse osmosis membranes.
Wang YH; Wu YH; Yu T; Zhao XH; Tong X; Bai Y; Huo ZY; Hu HY
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov; 693():133579. PubMed ID: 31376757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diminished swelling of cross-linked aromatic oligoamide surfaces revealing a new fouling mechanism of reverse-osmosis membranes.
Ying W; Kumar R; Herzberg M; Kasher R
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 49(11):6815-22. PubMed ID: 25920584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of chemical cleaning on RO membrane inorganic, organic and microbial foulant removal in a full-scale plant for municipal wastewater reclamation.
Yu T; Meng L; Zhao QB; Shi Y; Hu HY; Lu Y
Water Res; 2017 Apr; 113():1-10. PubMed ID: 28183034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
