231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24748211)
1. The clinical impact of subspecialized radiologist reinterpretation of abdominal imaging studies, with analysis of the types and relative frequency of interpretation discrepancies.
Lindgren EA; Patel MD; Wu Q; Melikian J; Hara AK
Abdom Imaging; 2014 Oct; 39(5):1119-26. PubMed ID: 24748211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The degree of abdominal imaging (AI) subspecialization of the reviewing radiologist significantly impacts the number of clinically relevant and incidental discrepancies identified during peer review of emergency after-hours body CT studies.
Bell ME; Patel MD
Abdom Imaging; 2014 Oct; 39(5):1114-8. PubMed ID: 24740761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality outcomes of reinterpretation of brain CT studies by subspecialty experts in stroke imaging.
Jordan YJ; Jordan JE; Lightfoote JB; Ragland KD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1365-70. PubMed ID: 23169731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Body MRI Subspecialty Reinterpretations at a Tertiary Care Center: Discrepancy Rates and Error Types.
Kostrubiak DE; DeHay PW; Ali N; D'Agostino R; Keating DP; Tam JK; Akselrod DG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Dec; 215(6):1384-1388. PubMed ID: 33052740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Second-Opinion Subspecialty Consultations in Musculoskeletal Radiology.
Chalian M; Del Grande F; Thakkar RS; Jalali SF; Chhabra A; Carrino JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1217-21. PubMed ID: 27058462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Second-opinion interpretations of neuroimaging studies by oncologic neuroradiologists can help reduce errors in cancer care.
Hatzoglou V; Omuro AM; Haque S; Khakoo Y; Ganly I; Oh JH; Shukla-Dave A; Fatovic R; Gaal J; Holodny AI
Cancer; 2016 Sep; 122(17):2708-14. PubMed ID: 27219108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality and Value of Subspecialty Reinterpretation of Thoracic CT Scans of Patients Referred to a Tertiary Cancer Center.
Carter BW; Erasmus JJ; Truong MT; Shepard JO; Hofstetter W; Clarke R; Munden RF; Steele JR
J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 Aug; 14(8):1109-1118. PubMed ID: 28434844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preliminary interpretations of after-hours CT and sonography by radiology residents versus final interpretations by body imaging radiologists at a level 1 trauma center.
Carney E; Kempf J; DeCarvalho V; Yudd A; Nosher J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Aug; 181(2):367-73. PubMed ID: 12876012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of outside radiologists' reports of computed tomography exams of emergently transferred patients.
Robinson JD; Linnau KF; Hippe DS; Sheehan KL; Gross JA
Emerg Radiol; 2018 Apr; 25(2):169-173. PubMed ID: 29282579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidental abdominopelvic findings on expanded field-of-view lumbar spinal MRI: frequency, clinical importance, and concordance in interpretation by neuroimaging and body imaging radiologists.
Maxwell AW; Keating DP; Nickerson JP
Clin Radiol; 2015 Feb; 70(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 25439794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Abdominal ultrasound: a task for the radiologist].
Puylaert JB
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Jan; 152(3):145. PubMed ID: 18271462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inadequacies of repeated radiological examinations in a university hospital.
Krug B; Wolters U; Stützer H; Lackner K
Acta Radiol; 2001 Nov; 42(6):612-7. PubMed ID: 11736711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MDCT of the abdomen: common misdiagnoses at a busy academic center.
Horton KM; Johnson PT; Fishman EK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Mar; 194(3):660-7. PubMed ID: 20173142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. JOURNAL CLUB: Hepatopancreaticobiliary Imaging Second-Opinion Consultations: Is There Value in the Second Reading?
Shetty AS; Mittal A; Salter A; Narra VR; Fowler KJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Dec; 211(6):1264-1272. PubMed ID: 30247982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Overnight resident interpretation of torso CT at a level 1 trauma center an analysis and review of the literature.
Chung JH; Strigel RM; Chew AR; Albrecht E; Gunn ML
Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1155-60. PubMed ID: 19481962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In comparison with other abdominal imaging modalities, which radiologists interpret abdominal MRI?
Rosenkrantz AB; Shanbhogue KP; Duszak R
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jul; 44(7):2656-2662. PubMed ID: 30968185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Abdominal extraosseous lesions of multiple myeloma: imaging findings.
Sedlic A; Chingkoe C; Lee KW; Duddalwar VA; Chang SD
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2014 Feb; 65(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 22402107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the appropriateness of outpatient abdominopelvic CT and MRI examinations using the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria.
Rosenkrantz AB; Marie K; Doshi A
Acad Radiol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 25442803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Abdominal pain: coronal reformations from isotropic voxels with 16-section CT--reader lesion detection and interpretation time.
Jaffe TA; Martin LC; Miller CM; Franklin KM; Merkle EM; Thompson WM; Nelson RC; DeLong DM; Paulson EK
Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):175-81. PubMed ID: 17185667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Clinical Impact of Resident-attending Discrepancies in On-call Radiology Reporting: A Retrospective Assessment.
McWilliams SR; Smith C; Oweis Y; Mawad K; Raptis C; Mellnick V
Acad Radiol; 2018 Jun; 25(6):727-732. PubMed ID: 29337090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
