These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24749664)

  • 1. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of online rehabilitative intervention for adult hearing-aid users.
    Thorén ES; Oberg M; Wänström G; Andersson G; Lunner T
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jul; 53(7):452-61. PubMed ID: 24749664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rehabilitative online education versus internet discussion group for hearing aid users: a randomized controlled trial.
    Thorén E; Svensson M; Törnqvist A; Andersson G; Carlbring P; Lunner T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 May; 22(5):274-85. PubMed ID: 21756843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acceptable noise level (ANL) and real-world hearing-aid success in Taiwanese listeners.
    Ho HC; Wu YH; Hsiao SH; Zhang X
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Nov; 52(11):762-70. PubMed ID: 24099584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Health behavior theories as predictors of hearing-aid uptake and outcomes.
    Saunders GH; Frederick MT; Silverman SC; Nielsen C; Laplante-Lévesque A
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Jul; 55 Suppl 3():S59-68. PubMed ID: 27145934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of the Swedish Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (Screening Version) and Evaluation of Its Effect in Hearing Aid Rehabilitation.
    Öberg M
    Trends Hear; 2016 Mar; 20():. PubMed ID: 27009755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring motivation using the transtheoretical (stages of change) model: A follow-up study of people who failed an online hearing screening.
    Ingo E; Brännström KJ; Andersson G; Lunner T; Laplante-Lévesque A
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Jul; 55 Suppl 3():S52-8. PubMed ID: 27206679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decision-making and outcomes of hearing help-seekers: A self-determination theory perspective.
    Ridgway J; Hickson L; Lind C
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Jul; 55 Suppl 3():S13-22. PubMed ID: 26750770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the short-term and long-term effects of an internet-based aural rehabilitation programme for hearing aid users in general clinical practice: a randomised controlled trial.
    Malmberg M; Lunner T; Kähäri K; Andersson G
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jun; 7(5):e013047. PubMed ID: 28592571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Internet Interventions for Hearing Loss.
    Thorén ES; Öberg M; Andersson G; Lunner T
    Am J Audiol; 2015 Sep; 24(3):316-9. PubMed ID: 26649538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Motivational engagement in first-time hearing aid users: A feasibility study.
    Ferguson M; Maidment D; Russell N; Gregory M; Nicholson R
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Jul; 55 Suppl 3():S23-33. PubMed ID: 26919044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of self-efficacy, expectations, and readiness on hearing aid outcomes.
    Ferguson MA; Woolley A; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Jul; 55 Suppl 3():S34-41. PubMed ID: 27266542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing aid use in nursing homes. Part 2: Barriers to effective utilization of hearing AIDS.
    Cohen-Mansfield J; Taylor JW
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2004; 5(5):289-96. PubMed ID: 15357886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Qualitative interviews on the beliefs and feelings of adults towards their ownership, but non-use of hearing aids.
    Linssen AM; Joore MA; Minten RK; van Leeuwen YD; Anteunis LJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):670-7. PubMed ID: 23829584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users.
    Olsen SØ; Lantz J; Nielsen LH; Brännström KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):678-88. PubMed ID: 22731922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hearing difficulties, uptake, and outcomes of hearing aids in people 85 years of age.
    Öberg M; Marcusson J; Nägga K; Wressle E
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Feb; 51(2):108-15. PubMed ID: 22107444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users.
    Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Pedersen MS; Rönnberg J
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):433-41. PubMed ID: 23550584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of the 'patient journey' model in the internet-based pre-fitting counseling of a person with hearing disability: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Manchaiah VK; Stephens D; Andersson G; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Trials; 2013 Jan; 14():25. PubMed ID: 23347711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identifying the barriers and facilitators to optimal hearing aid self-efficacy.
    Meyer C; Hickson L; Fletcher A
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S28-37. PubMed ID: 24447235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality of life, effort and disturbance perceived in noise: a comparison between employees with aided hearing impairment and normal hearing.
    Hua H; Karlsson J; Widén S; Möller C; Lyxell B
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Sep; 52(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 23808681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Synchronous remote fine-tuning and follow-up within aural rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial.
    Malmberg M; Hagberg J
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Jun; 63(6):458-466. PubMed ID: 36971711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.