These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24749864)

  • 1. Redesigning photo-ID to improve unfamiliar face matching performance.
    White D; Burton AM; Jenkins R; Kemp RI
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Jun; 20(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 24749864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Viewers base estimates of face matching accuracy on their own familiarity: Explaining the photo-ID paradox.
    Ritchie KL; Smith FG; Jenkins R; Bindemann M; White D; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2015 Aug; 141():161-9. PubMed ID: 25988915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Matching faces to photographs: poor performance in eyewitness memory (without the memory).
    Megreya AM; Burton AM
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Dec; 14(4):364-72. PubMed ID: 19102619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fraudulent ID using face morphs: Experiments on human and automatic recognition.
    Robertson DJ; Kramer RS; Burton AM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173319. PubMed ID: 28328928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identity-level representations affect unfamiliar face matching performance in sequential but not simultaneous tasks.
    Menon N; White D; Kemp RI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1777-93. PubMed ID: 25686094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variation in Photos of the Same Face Drives Improvements in Identity Verification.
    Menon N; White D; Kemp RI
    Perception; 2015; 44(11):1332-41. PubMed ID: 26562899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Face learning and the emergence of view-independent face recognition: an event-related brain potential study.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1320-9. PubMed ID: 23583970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Telling faces together: Learning new faces through exposure to multiple instances.
    Andrews S; Jenkins R; Cursiter H; Burton AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(10):2041-50. PubMed ID: 25607814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variability in photos of the same face.
    Jenkins R; White D; Van Montfort X; Mike Burton A
    Cognition; 2011 Dec; 121(3):313-23. PubMed ID: 21890124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Face learning with multiple images leads to fast acquisition of familiarity for specific individuals.
    Dowsett AJ; Sandford A; Burton AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 25671778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features.
    Young AW; Hay DC; McWeeny KH; Flude BM; Ellis AW
    Perception; 1985; 14(6):737-46. PubMed ID: 3837875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning faces from variability.
    Ritchie KL; Burton AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 May; 70(5):897-905. PubMed ID: 26831280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unfamiliar face matching: Pairs out-perform individuals and provide a route to training.
    Dowsett AJ; Burton AM
    Br J Psychol; 2015 Aug; 106(3):433-45. PubMed ID: 25393594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Not looking yourself: The cost of self-selecting photographs for identity verification.
    White D; Burton AL; Kemp RI
    Br J Psychol; 2016 May; 107(2):359-73. PubMed ID: 26105729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Passport officers' errors in face matching.
    White D; Kemp RI; Jenkins R; Matheson M; Burton AM
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e103510. PubMed ID: 25133682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The movement advantage in famous and unfamiliar faces: a comparison of point-light displays and shape-normalised avatar stimuli.
    Bennetts RJ; Kim J; Burke D; Brooks KR; Lucey S; Saragih J; Robbins RA
    Perception; 2013; 42(9):950-70. PubMed ID: 24386715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Who can recognize unfamiliar faces? Individual differences and observer consistency in person identification.
    Bindemann M; Avetisyan M; Rakow T
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Sep; 18(3):277-91. PubMed ID: 22905851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Within-person variability can improve the identification of unfamiliar faces across changes in viewpoint.
    Hunnisett N; Favelle S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Nov; 74(11):1873-1887. PubMed ID: 33783277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biased lineup instructions and face identification from video images.
    Thompson WB; Johnson J
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jan; 135(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 18318406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Face averages and multiple images in a live matching task.
    Ritchie KL; Mireku MO; Kramer RSS
    Br J Psychol; 2020 Feb; 111(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 30945267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.