These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24749963)

  • 1. An exemplar-familiarity model predicts short-term and long-term probe recognition across diverse forms of memory search.
    Nosofsky RM; Cox GE; Cao R; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1524-39. PubMed ID: 24749963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Familiarity and categorization processes in memory search.
    Nosofsky RM; Cao R; Cox GE; Shiffrin RM
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Dec; 75():97-129. PubMed ID: 25240209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A power-law model of psychological memory strength in short- and long-term recognition.
    Donkin C; Nosofsky RM
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Jun; 23(6):625-34. PubMed ID: 22527527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Item frequency in probe-recognition memory search: Converging evidence for a role of item-response learning.
    Cao R; Shiffrin RM; Nosofsky RM
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Apr; 46(3):450-463. PubMed ID: 29264863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The development of automaticity in short-term memory search: Item-response learning and category learning.
    Cao R; Nosofsky RM; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):669-679. PubMed ID: 27929327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response-time evidence for mixed memory states in a sequential-presentation change-detection task.
    Nosofsky RM; Donkin C
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Feb; 84():31-62. PubMed ID: 26706291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speeded old-new recognition of multidimensional perceptual stimuli: modeling performance at the individual-participant and individual-item levels.
    Nosofsky RM; Stanton RD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):314-34. PubMed ID: 16634673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Searching for the right word: Hybrid visual and memory search for words.
    Boettcher SE; Wolfe JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1132-42. PubMed ID: 25788035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short-term memory scanning viewed as exemplar-based categorization.
    Nosofsky RM; Little DR; Donkin C; Fific M
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):280-315. PubMed ID: 21355662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling short- and long-term memory contributions to recent event recognition.
    Nosofsky RM; Cao R; Harding SM; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Feb; 47(2):316-342. PubMed ID: 32105142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. You look familiar, but I don't care: Lure rejection in hybrid visual and memory search is not based on familiarity.
    Wolfe JM; Boettcher SE; Josephs EL; Cunningham CA; Drew T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1576-87. PubMed ID: 26191615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Misremembering what you see or hear: Dissociable effects of modality on short- and long-term false recognition.
    Olszewska JM; Reuter-Lorenz PA; Munier E; Bendler SA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1316-25. PubMed ID: 25867611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Task-switching cost and repetition priming: two overlooked confounds in the first-set procedure of the Sternberg paradigm and how they affect memory set-size effects.
    Jou J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):1871-94. PubMed ID: 24321032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The long-term recency effect in recognition memory.
    Talmi D; Goshen-Gottstein Y
    Memory; 2006 May; 14(4):424-36. PubMed ID: 16766446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is a search template an ordinary working memory? Comparing electrophysiological markers of working memory maintenance for visual search and recognition.
    Gunseli E; Meeter M; Olivers CN
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jul; 60():29-38. PubMed ID: 24878275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The distribution of subjective memory strength: list strength and response bias.
    Criss AH
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Dec; 59(4):297-319. PubMed ID: 19765699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Test sequence priming in recognition memory.
    Johns EE; Mewhort DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1162-74. PubMed ID: 19686012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple levels of stimulus representation in visual working memory.
    Shin E; Fabiani M; Gratton G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):844-58. PubMed ID: 16768382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Control of interference during working memory updating.
    Szmalec A; Verbruggen F; Vandierendonck A; Kemps E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):137-51. PubMed ID: 20731517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.