These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24750293)

  • 1. The influence of interimplant divergence on the retention characteristics of locator attachments, a laboratory study.
    Stephens GJ; di Vitale N; O'Sullivan E; McDonald A
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Aug; 23(6):467-75. PubMed ID: 24750293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The retentive forces of the locator attachment system at different angulations.
    Stergiou A; Juszczyk AS; Clark RK; Radford DR
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Dec; 20(4):168-74. PubMed ID: 23495558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of simulated masticatory loading on the retention of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Abi Nader S; de Souza RF; Fortin D; De Koninck L; Fromentin O; Albuquerque Junior RF
    J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Mar; 38(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 20819139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retentive Properties of Two Stud Attachments with Polyetherketoneketone or Nylon Insert in Mandibular Implant Overdentures.
    Choi JW; Yun BH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1079-1088. PubMed ID: 30231095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of retention and wear of a titanium-formed stud overdenture attachment with different interimplant angulations after simulated clinical use: An in vitro study.
    Elsonbaty MA; Alshimy AM; Abdul-Monem MM; Neena AF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):205.e1-205.e10. PubMed ID: 35842280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methodology for measuring the in vitro seating and unseating forces of prefabricated attachment systems used to retain implant overdentures.
    Fakhry A; Tan SC; Heiner AD; Dehkordi-Vakil FH; Dircks HW
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Feb; 19(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 19895429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effect of Different Water Temperatures on Retention Loss and Material Degradation of Locator Attachments.
    Chiu LPY; Vitale ND; Petridis H; McDonald A
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Aug; 26(6):537-544. PubMed ID: 26861254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.
    Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 24819528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retention and wear behaviors of two implant overdenture stud-type attachments at different implant angulations.
    Choi JW; Bae JH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 27863857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of in vitro cyclic dislodging on retentive force and removal torque of three overdenture attachment systems.
    Kobayashi M; Srinivasan M; Ammann P; Perriard J; Ohkubo C; Müller F; Belser UC; Schimmel M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 23566266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro comparison of the retentive properties of ball and locator attachments for implant overdentures.
    Türk PE; Geckili O; Türk Y; Günay V; Bilgin T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25216136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
    Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of implant angulations and attachment configurations on the retentive forces of locator attachment-retained overdentures.
    Uludag B; Polat S; Sahin V; Çomut AA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1053-7. PubMed ID: 25216129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of Interimplant Distance and Cyclic Loading on the Retention of Overdenture Attachments.
    Shayegh SS; Hakimaneh SM; Baghani MT; Shidfar S; Kashi FK; Zamanian A; Arezoobakhsh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Nov; 18(11):1078-1084. PubMed ID: 29109325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retention and wear of resin matrix attachments for implant overdentures.
    Wichmann N; Kern M; Taylor T; Wille S; Passia N
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Oct; 110():103901. PubMed ID: 32957206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical performance and material properties of single-implant overdenture attachment systems.
    Alsabeeha NH; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 21519573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of denture cleansing solutions on the retention of pink locator attachments after multiple pulls: an in vitro study.
    You W; Masri R; Romberg E; Driscoll CF; You T
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Aug; 20(6):464-9. PubMed ID: 21777332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Locator Versus Bar Attachment Effect on the Retention and Stability of Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdenture: An In Vitro Study.
    ELsyad MA; Dayekh MA; Khalifa AK
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e627-e636. PubMed ID: 28387994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The
    Kurtulus IL; Gurbulak AG
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 May; 21(5):639-644. PubMed ID: 29735866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of implant angulation on attachment retention in mandibular two-implant overdentures: a clinical study.
    Jabbour Z; Fromentin O; Lassauzay C; Abi Nader S; Correa JA; Feine J; de Albuquerque Junior RF
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Aug; 16(4):565-71. PubMed ID: 23305358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.