These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24750626)

  • 1. Analysis of crystallinity changes in cellulose II polymers using carbohydrate-binding modules.
    Široký J; Benians TA; Russell SJ; Bechtold T; Paul Knox J; Blackburn RS
    Carbohydr Polym; 2012 Jun; 89(1):213-21. PubMed ID: 24750626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative analysis of crystallinity changes in cellulose I polymers using ATR-FTIR, X-ray diffraction, and carbohydrate-binding module probes.
    Kljun A; Benians TA; Goubet F; Meulewaeter F; Knox JP; Blackburn RS
    Biomacromolecules; 2011 Nov; 12(11):4121-6. PubMed ID: 21981266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of the surfaces of wood tissues and pulp fibers using carbohydrate-binding modules specific for crystalline cellulose and mannan.
    Filonova L; Kallas AM; Greffe L; Johansson G; Teeri TT; Daniel G
    Biomacromolecules; 2007 Jan; 8(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 17206793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crystalline structure analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide by means of X-ray diffraction and FTIR spectroscopy.
    Oh SY; Yoo DI; Shin Y; Kim HC; Kim HY; Chung YS; Park WH; Youk JH
    Carbohydr Res; 2005 Oct; 340(15):2376-91. PubMed ID: 16153620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structure study of cellulose fibers wet-spun from environmentally friendly NaOH/urea aqueous solutions.
    Chen X; Burger C; Wan F; Zhang J; Rong L; Hsiao BS; Chu B; Cai J; Zhang L
    Biomacromolecules; 2007 Jun; 8(6):1918-26. PubMed ID: 17472335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding the biological rationale for the diversity of cellulose-directed carbohydrate-binding modules in prokaryotic enzymes.
    Blake AW; McCartney L; Flint JE; Bolam DN; Boraston AB; Gilbert HJ; Knox JP
    J Biol Chem; 2006 Sep; 281(39):29321-9. PubMed ID: 16844685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structure and properties of novel fibers spun from cellulose in NaOH/thiourea aqueous solution.
    Ruan D; Zhang L; Zhou J; Jin H; Chen H
    Macromol Biosci; 2004 Dec; 4(12):1105-12. PubMed ID: 15586387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FTIR analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide.
    Oh SY; Yoo DI; Shin Y; Seo G
    Carbohydr Res; 2005 Feb; 340(3):417-28. PubMed ID: 15680597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of exposed cellulose surfaces in pretreated wood biomass using carbohydrate-binding module (CBM)-cyan fluorescent protein (CFP).
    Kawakubo T; Karita S; Araki Y; Watanabe S; Oyadomari M; Takada R; Tanaka F; Abe K; Watanabe T; Honda Y; Watanabe T
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2010 Feb; 105(3):499-508. PubMed ID: 19777599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cellulose-specific Type B carbohydrate binding modules: understanding oligomeric and non-crystalline substrate recognition mechanisms.
    Kognole AA; Payne CM
    Biotechnol Biofuels; 2018; 11():319. PubMed ID: 30519283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of polymorphs on dissolution of cellulose in NaOH/urea aqueous solution.
    Chen X; Chen J; You T; Wang K; Xu F
    Carbohydr Polym; 2015 Jul; 125():85-91. PubMed ID: 25857963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Alkaline treatment combined with enzymatic hydrolysis for efficient cellulose nanofibrils production.
    Banvillet G; Depres G; Belgacem N; Bras J
    Carbohydr Polym; 2021 Mar; 255():117383. PubMed ID: 33436212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of hemicellulose removal on cellulose fiber structure and recycling characteristics of eucalyptus pulp.
    Wan J; Wang Y; Xiao Q
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Jun; 101(12):4577-83. PubMed ID: 20181478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In situ imaging of single carbohydrate-binding modules on cellulose microfibrils.
    Dagel DJ; Liu YS; Zhong L; Luo Y; Himmel ME; Xu Q; Zeng Y; Ding SY; Smith S
    J Phys Chem B; 2011 Feb; 115(4):635-41. PubMed ID: 21162585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Structure of aqueous solutions of microcrystalline cellulose/sodium hydroxide below 0 degrees C and the limit of cellulose dissolution.
    Egal M; Budtova T; Navard P
    Biomacromolecules; 2007 Jul; 8(7):2282-7. PubMed ID: 17571851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Carbohydrate-binding modules recognize fine substructures of cellulose.
    McLean BW; Boraston AB; Brouwer D; Sanaie N; Fyfe CA; Warren RA; Kilburn DG; Haynes CA
    J Biol Chem; 2002 Dec; 277(52):50245-54. PubMed ID: 12191997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantifying cellulose accessibility during enzyme-mediated deconstruction using 2 fluorescence-tagged carbohydrate-binding modules.
    Novy V; Aïssa K; Nielsen F; Straus SK; Ciesielski P; Hunt CG; Saddler J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Nov; 116(45):22545-22551. PubMed ID: 31636211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The properties of enzyme-hydrolyzed cellulose in aqueous sodium hydroxide.
    Cao Y; Tan H
    Carbohydr Res; 2002 Sep; 337(16):1453-7. PubMed ID: 12204606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Synthesis of highly substituted carboxymethyl cellulose depending on cellulose particle size.
    Yeasmin MS; Mondal MI
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2015 Sep; 80():725-31. PubMed ID: 26210036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of the cellulose-binding domain from Clostridium cellulovorans on the supramolecular structure of cellulose fibers.
    Ciolacu D; Kovac J; Kokol V
    Carbohydr Res; 2010 Mar; 345(5):621-30. PubMed ID: 20122684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.