BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1657 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24750995)

  • 1. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
    Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New technique of transanal proctectomy with completely robotic total mesorrectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Gómez Ruiz M; Palazuelos CM; Martín Parra JI; Alonso Martín J; Cagigas Fernández C; del Castillo Diego J; Gómez Fleitas M
    Cir Esp; 2014 May; 92(5):356-61. PubMed ID: 24589418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Is There Any Difference in the Transanal TME Rectal Approach? : A Single-Center Series of 120 Consecutive Patients.
    Colombo PE; Bertrand MM; Alline M; Boulay E; Mourregot A; Carrère S; Quénet F; Jarlier M; Rouanet P
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 May; 23(5):1594-600. PubMed ID: 26714950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic versus laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for mid or low rectal cancer in male patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of long-term outcomes.
    Asoglu O; Tokmak H; Bakir B; Aliyev V; Saglam S; Iscan Y; Bademler S; Meric S
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Jun; 14(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 31313071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.
    de Jesus JP; Valadão M; de Castro Araujo RO; Cesar D; Linhares E; Iglesias AC
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 42(6):808-12. PubMed ID: 27038996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective pilot study.
    Gómez Ruiz M; Parra IM; Palazuelos CM; Martín JA; Fernández CC; Diego JC; Fleitas MG
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Jan; 58(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 25489707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
    Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer in male patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
    Serin KR; Gultekin FA; Batman B; Ay S; Kapran Y; Saglam S; Asoglu O
    J Robot Surg; 2015 Sep; 9(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 26531198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Results of a Single-Center Series of 400 Consecutive Patients and Perspectives.
    Rouanet P; Bertrand MM; Jarlier M; Mourregot A; Traore D; Taoum C; de Forges H; Colombo PE
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 25(12):3572-3579. PubMed ID: 30171509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of robotic learning curve on histopathology in rectal cancer: A pooled analysis.
    Gachabayov M; Kim SH; Jimenez-Rodriguez R; Kuo LJ; Cianchi F; Tulina I; Tsarkov P; Bergamaschi R
    Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 34():121-125. PubMed ID: 32891316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis].
    Shi FY; Zhang L; Qin Q; Jin X; Hu CH; Yu TY; Ma L; Wang GH; Wu H; Xia P; Sun XJ; She JJ
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):370-376. PubMed ID: 32306605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prior experience in laparoscopic rectal surgery can minimise the learning curve for robotic rectal resections: a cumulative sum analysis.
    Odermatt M; Ahmed J; Panteleimonitis S; Khan J; Parvaiz A
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4067-4076. PubMed ID: 28271267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer results in higher lymph node yield and better short-term outcomes than open surgery: a large single-center comparative study.
    Boutros M; Hippalgaonkar N; Silva E; Allende D; Wexner SD; Berho M
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Jun; 56(6):679-88. PubMed ID: 23652740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The long-term oncological outcomes of the 140 robotic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a single surgeon experience.
    Aliyev V; Tokmak H; Goksel S; Meric S; Acar S; Kaya H; Asoglu O
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):655-661. PubMed ID: 31811567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Rectal cancer within 10 cm. Comparison of the radicality of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques with regard to the circumferential resection margin and the completeness of mesorectal excision].
    Dušek T; Ferko A; Orhalmi J; Chobola M; Nikolov DH; Hovorková E; Cermáková E
    Rozhl Chir; 2013 Jun; 92(6):312-9. PubMed ID: 23965316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hybrid abdominal robotic approach with conventional transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: feasibility and outcomes from a single institution.
    Nikolic A; Waters PS; Peacock O; Choi CC; Rajkomar A; Heriot AG; Smart P; Warrier S
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):633-641. PubMed ID: 31625075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparative study of short and long-term outcomes.
    Ghezzi TL; Luca F; Valvo M; Corleta OC; Zuccaro M; Cenciarelli S; Biffi R
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1072-9. PubMed ID: 24646748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preclinical cadaveric study of transanal robotic proctectomy with total mesorectal excision combined with laparoscopic assistance.
    Gomez Ruiz M; Martin Parra I; Calleja Iglesias A; Stein H; Sprinkle S; Manuel Palazuelos C; Alonso Martin J; Cagigas Fernandez C; Castillo Diego J; Gomez Fleitas M
    Int J Med Robot; 2015 Jun; 11(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 24574007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.
    Feroci F; Vannucchi A; Bianchi PP; Cantafio S; Garzi A; Formisano G; Scatizzi M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 22(13):3602-10. PubMed ID: 27053852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 83.