These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1669 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24750995)

  • 1. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
    Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New technique of transanal proctectomy with completely robotic total mesorrectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Gómez Ruiz M; Palazuelos CM; Martín Parra JI; Alonso Martín J; Cagigas Fernández C; del Castillo Diego J; Gómez Fleitas M
    Cir Esp; 2014 May; 92(5):356-61. PubMed ID: 24589418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Is There Any Difference in the Transanal TME Rectal Approach? : A Single-Center Series of 120 Consecutive Patients.
    Colombo PE; Bertrand MM; Alline M; Boulay E; Mourregot A; Carrère S; Quénet F; Jarlier M; Rouanet P
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 May; 23(5):1594-600. PubMed ID: 26714950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic versus laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for mid or low rectal cancer in male patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of long-term outcomes.
    Asoglu O; Tokmak H; Bakir B; Aliyev V; Saglam S; Iscan Y; Bademler S; Meric S
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Jun; 14(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 31313071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.
    de Jesus JP; Valadão M; de Castro Araujo RO; Cesar D; Linhares E; Iglesias AC
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 42(6):808-12. PubMed ID: 27038996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective pilot study.
    Gómez Ruiz M; Parra IM; Palazuelos CM; Martín JA; Fernández CC; Diego JC; Fleitas MG
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Jan; 58(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 25489707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
    Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer in male patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
    Serin KR; Gultekin FA; Batman B; Ay S; Kapran Y; Saglam S; Asoglu O
    J Robot Surg; 2015 Sep; 9(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 26531198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Results of a Single-Center Series of 400 Consecutive Patients and Perspectives.
    Rouanet P; Bertrand MM; Jarlier M; Mourregot A; Traore D; Taoum C; de Forges H; Colombo PE
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 25(12):3572-3579. PubMed ID: 30171509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of robotic learning curve on histopathology in rectal cancer: A pooled analysis.
    Gachabayov M; Kim SH; Jimenez-Rodriguez R; Kuo LJ; Cianchi F; Tulina I; Tsarkov P; Bergamaschi R
    Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 34():121-125. PubMed ID: 32891316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes in Total Mesorectal Excision and Margin Status for Rectal Cancer.
    Mirza MB; Gamboa AC; Irlmeier R; Hopkins B; Regenbogen SE; Hrebinko KA; Holder-Murray J; Wiseman JT; Ejaz A; Wise PE; Ye F; Idrees K; Hawkins AT; Balch GC; Khan A
    J Surg Res; 2024 Aug; 300():494-502. PubMed ID: 38875948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis].
    Shi FY; Zhang L; Qin Q; Jin X; Hu CH; Yu TY; Ma L; Wang GH; Wu H; Xia P; Sun XJ; She JJ
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):370-376. PubMed ID: 32306605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prior experience in laparoscopic rectal surgery can minimise the learning curve for robotic rectal resections: a cumulative sum analysis.
    Odermatt M; Ahmed J; Panteleimonitis S; Khan J; Parvaiz A
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4067-4076. PubMed ID: 28271267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer results in higher lymph node yield and better short-term outcomes than open surgery: a large single-center comparative study.
    Boutros M; Hippalgaonkar N; Silva E; Allende D; Wexner SD; Berho M
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Jun; 56(6):679-88. PubMed ID: 23652740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The long-term oncological outcomes of the 140 robotic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a single surgeon experience.
    Aliyev V; Tokmak H; Goksel S; Meric S; Acar S; Kaya H; Asoglu O
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):655-661. PubMed ID: 31811567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Rectal cancer within 10 cm. Comparison of the radicality of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques with regard to the circumferential resection margin and the completeness of mesorectal excision].
    Dušek T; Ferko A; Orhalmi J; Chobola M; Nikolov DH; Hovorková E; Cermáková E
    Rozhl Chir; 2013 Jun; 92(6):312-9. PubMed ID: 23965316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hybrid abdominal robotic approach with conventional transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: feasibility and outcomes from a single institution.
    Nikolic A; Waters PS; Peacock O; Choi CC; Rajkomar A; Heriot AG; Smart P; Warrier S
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):633-641. PubMed ID: 31625075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparative study of short and long-term outcomes.
    Ghezzi TL; Luca F; Valvo M; Corleta OC; Zuccaro M; Cenciarelli S; Biffi R
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1072-9. PubMed ID: 24646748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preclinical cadaveric study of transanal robotic proctectomy with total mesorectal excision combined with laparoscopic assistance.
    Gomez Ruiz M; Martin Parra I; Calleja Iglesias A; Stein H; Sprinkle S; Manuel Palazuelos C; Alonso Martin J; Cagigas Fernandez C; Castillo Diego J; Gomez Fleitas M
    Int J Med Robot; 2015 Jun; 11(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 24574007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 84.