BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

427 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24751125)

  • 1. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
    Keane C; Young M
    ANZ J Surg; 2014 Oct; 84(10):758-62. PubMed ID: 24751125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The ability of phased-array MRI in preoperative staging of primary rectal cancer: correlation with histopathological results.
    Karatağ O; Karatağ GY; Özkurt H; Değirmenci HK; Avlanmış Ö; Başak M; Baykan A
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2012; 18(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 21671218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of Preoperative MRI to Select Candidates for Local Excision of MRI-Staged T1 and T2 Rectal Cancer: Can MRI Select Patients With N0 Tumors?
    An C; Huh H; Han KH; Kim MJ; Kim NK; Kim H; Lim JS
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Oct; 58(10):923-30. PubMed ID: 26347963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of pathological stage and circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer].
    Jiang JB; Dai Y; Zhang XM; Li CF; Jin ZT; Bi DS; Sun JZ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 86(14):961-4. PubMed ID: 16759535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in the pre-operative staging of rectal adenocarcinoma: Experience from a regional Australian cancer center.
    White R; Ung KA; Mathlum M
    Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2013 Dec; 9(4):318-23. PubMed ID: 23176523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
    Akasu T; Iinuma G; Takawa M; Yamamoto S; Muramatsu Y; Moriyama N
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):2787-94. PubMed ID: 19618244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of gadofosveset-enhanced MRI for nodal staging and restaging in rectal cancer.
    Lambregts DM; Beets GL; Maas M; Kessels AG; Bakers FC; Cappendijk VC; Engelen SM; Lahaye MJ; de Bruïne AP; Lammering G; Leiner T; Verwoerd JL; Wildberger JE; Beets-Tan RG
    Ann Surg; 2011 Mar; 253(3):539-45. PubMed ID: 21239980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic accuracy of 3.0-Tesla rectal magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative local staging of primary rectal cancer.
    Kim SH; Lee JM; Lee MW; Kim GH; Han JK; Choi BI
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Aug; 43(8):587-93. PubMed ID: 18648259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.
    Brown G; Radcliffe AG; Newcombe RG; Dallimore NS; Bourne MW; Williams GT
    Br J Surg; 2003 Mar; 90(3):355-64. PubMed ID: 12594673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnetic resonance imaging accuracy in assessing tumour down-staging following chemoradiation in rectal cancer.
    Suppiah A; Hunter IA; Cowley J; Garimella V; Cast J; Hartley JE; Monson JR
    Colorectal Dis; 2009 Mar; 11(3):249-53. PubMed ID: 18513192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Diagnosis on the preoperative staging of rectal cancer by magnetic resonance imaging with water-bag in rectum].
    Wu CQ; Yang BL; Gu YF
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 May; 11(3):246-8. PubMed ID: 18478469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Local staging of rectal cancer using combined pelvic phased-array and endorectal coil MRI.
    Tatli S; Mortele KJ; Breen EL; Bleday R; Silverman SG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Apr; 23(4):534-40. PubMed ID: 16523466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector row computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer.
    Kim CK; Kim SH; Choi D; Kim MJ; Chun HK; Lee SJ; Lee JM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(6):853-9. PubMed ID: 18043346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: comparison of 3-T high-field MRI and endorectal sonography.
    Chun HK; Choi D; Kim MJ; Lee J; Yun SH; Kim SH; Lee SJ; Kim CK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1557-62. PubMed ID: 17114550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic resonance imaging in suspected rectal cancer: determining tumor localization, stage, and sphincter-saving resectability at 3-Tesla-sustained high resolution.
    Winter L; Bruhn H; Langrehr J; Neuhaus P; Felix R; Hänninen LE
    Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 17453515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endorectal coil MRI in local staging of rectal cancer.
    Torricelli P; Lo Russo S; Pecchi A; Luppi G; Cesinaro AM; Romagnoli R
    Radiol Med; 2002; 103(1-2):74-83. PubMed ID: 11859303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparative study of endorectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer].
    Guo F; Ren J; Wang S; Dai W; Ma N
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 May; 94(17):1318-21. PubMed ID: 25142852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with pathological staging.
    Faletti R; Gatti M; Arezzo A; Stola S; Benedini MC; Bergamasco L; Morino M; Fonio P
    Minerva Chir; 2018 Feb; 73(1):13-19. PubMed ID: 28497665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What is the optimal treatment in clinical stage T3N0M0 rectal cancer?
    Tural D; Yildiz O; Elcin O; Erdamar S; Guney S; Demireli F; Buyukunal E; Serdengecti S
    J BUON; 2014; 19(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 24659649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of preoperative MRI in predicting pathology stage in rectal cancers: node-for-node matched histopathology validation of MRI features.
    Park JS; Jang YJ; Choi GS; Park SY; Kim HJ; Kang H; Cho SH
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Jan; 57(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 24316943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.