These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24751817)

  • 21. Author conflict and bias in research: quantifying the downgrade in methodology.
    Vaccaro AR; Patel AA; Fisher C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(14):E895-6. PubMed ID: 21642805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bias in surgical research.
    Paradis C
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 18650626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Is it time for the Cochrane Collaboration to reconsider its meta-analysis methodology?
    Onitilo AA
    Clin Med Res; 2014 Sep; 12(1-2):2-3. PubMed ID: 24573703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bias in genetic association studies: effects of research location and resources.
    Munafò MR; Attwood AS; Flint J
    Psychol Med; 2008 Aug; 38(8):1213-4. PubMed ID: 18598581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Safe and proper care at universities].
    Norberg AL; Von Essen L
    Lakartidningen; 2013 Dec 4-17; 110(49-50):2251. PubMed ID: 24494401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Uptake of methods to deal with publication bias in systematic reviews has increased over time, but there is still much scope for improvement.
    Parekh-Bhurke S; Kwok CS; Pang C; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder JJ; Sutton AJ; Hing CB; Harvey I; Song F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 20800992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Combining data from multiple studies: an introduction to meta-analysis in paediatric surgery.
    Eaton S
    J Pediatr Surg; 2013 Feb; 48(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 23414852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Conflict of interest. Stung by controversy, biomedical groups urge consistent guidelines.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2007 Jul; 317(5837):441. PubMed ID: 17656694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Re: The ongoing tyranny of statistical significance testing in biomedical research.
    Vanderweele TJ
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 25(11):843; author reply 844-5. PubMed ID: 21103912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Celebrate your limitations.
    Lowe JB
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2009 Aug; 33(4):304-5. PubMed ID: 19689587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Has the Research Excellence Framework killed creativity?
    Gray R
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2015 Apr; 22(3):155-6. PubMed ID: 25808461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Good publishing practice.
    Knottnerus JA; Tugwell P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 65(4):353-4. PubMed ID: 22360986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Bayesian analysis of mixture structural equation models with non-ignorable missing responses and covariates.
    Cai JH; Song XY; Hser YI
    Stat Med; 2010 Aug; 29(18):1861-74. PubMed ID: 20680980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reprint: Good laboratory practice: preventing introduction of bias at the bench.
    Macleod MR; Fisher M; O'Collins V; Sena ES; Dirnagl U; Bath PM; Buchan A; van der Worp HB; Traystman RJ; Minematsu K; Donnan GA; Howells DW
    Int J Stroke; 2009 Feb; 4(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 19236488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Data presentation and the use of statistical tests in biomedical journals: can we reach a consensus?
    Evans RG; Su DF
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2011 May; 38(5):285-6. PubMed ID: 21388434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research.
    Jannot AS; Agoritsas T; Gayet-Ageron A; Perneger TV
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Mar; 66(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 23347853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bias resulting from the use of 'assay sensitivity' as an inclusion criterion for meta-analysis.
    Gelfand LA; Strunk DR; Tu XM; Noble RE; Derubeis RJ
    Stat Med; 2006 Mar; 25(6):943-55. PubMed ID: 16196080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cohort studies: marching forward.
    Thadhani R; Tonelli M
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2006 Sep; 1(5):1117-23. PubMed ID: 17699334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results.
    Schmidt FL; Oh IS; Hayes TL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):97-128. PubMed ID: 18001516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.