These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24752001)

  • 1. Time-lapse embryo imaging technology: does it improve the clinical results?
    Findikli N; Oral E
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 26(3):138-44. PubMed ID: 24752001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selection of high potential embryos using time-lapse imaging: the era of morphokinetics.
    Herrero J; Meseguer M
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Mar; 99(4):1030-4. PubMed ID: 23395415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Time-lapse imaging of preimplantation embryos.
    Conaghan J
    Semin Reprod Med; 2014 Mar; 32(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 24515908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus day 3 morphology: results from a prospective multicenter trial.
    Conaghan J; Chen AA; Willman SP; Ivani K; Chenette PE; Boostanfar R; Baker VL; Adamson GD; Abusief ME; Gvakharia M; Loewke KE; Shen S
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug; 100(2):412-9.e5. PubMed ID: 23721712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time-lapse imaging: Morphokinetic analysis of in vitro fertilization outcomes.
    Giménez C; Conversa L; Murria L; Meseguer M
    Fertil Steril; 2023 Aug; 120(2):218-227. PubMed ID: 37364673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved implantation rates of day 3 embryo transfers with the use of an automated time-lapse-enabled test to aid in embryo selection.
    Adamson GD; Abusief ME; Palao L; Witmer J; Palao LM; Gvakharia M
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):369-75.e6. PubMed ID: 26604069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Does embryo morphology constitute a reliable criterion for embryo selection?].
    Scalici E; Gala A; Ferrières A; Vincens C; Hamamah S
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Sep; 42(9):661-4. PubMed ID: 25153441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Choosing the best embryo by time lapse versus standard morphology.
    Kirkegaard K; Ahlström A; Ingerslev HJ; Hardarson T
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Feb; 103(2):323-32. PubMed ID: 25527231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What does morphokinetics add to embryo selection and in-vitro fertilization outcomes?
    Basile N; Caiazzo M; Meseguer M
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 27(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 25699478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation.
    Meseguer M; Herrero J; Tejera A; Hilligsøe KM; Ramsing NB; Remohí J
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Oct; 26(10):2658-71. PubMed ID: 21828117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of time lapse photography in an in vitro fertilization programme for better selection for embryo transfer.
    Kovačič B; Hojnik N; Vlaisavljević V
    J Stem Cells; 2014; 9(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 25158088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Morphokinetic analysis of human embryo development and its relationship to the female age: a retrospective time-lapse imaging study.
    Akhter N; Shahab M
    Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2017 Aug; 63(8):84-92. PubMed ID: 28886319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selecting embryos with the highest implantation potential using data mining and decision tree based on classical embryo morphology and morphokinetics.
    Carrasco B; Arroyo G; Gil Y; Gómez MJ; Rodríguez I; Barri PN; Veiga A; Boada M
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Aug; 34(8):983-990. PubMed ID: 28573526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hatching of in vitro fertilized human embryos is influenced by fertilization method.
    Kirkegaard K; Hindkjaer JJ; Ingerslev HJ
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Nov; 100(5):1277-82. PubMed ID: 23909991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cleavage kinetics analysis of human embryos predicts development to blastocyst and implantation.
    Dal Canto M; Coticchio G; Mignini Renzini M; De Ponti E; Novara PV; Brambillasca F; Comi R; Fadini R
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Nov; 25(5):474-80. PubMed ID: 22995750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transfer of blastocysts with deviant morphological and morphokinetic parameters at early stages of in-vitro development: a case series.
    Stecher A; Vanderzwalmen P; Zintz M; Wirleitner B; Schuff M; Spitzer D; Zech NH
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Apr; 28(4):424-35. PubMed ID: 24581992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oocyte insemination techniques are related to alterations of embryo developmental timing in an oocyte donation model.
    Cruz M; Garrido N; Gadea B; Muñoz M; Pérez-Cano I; Meseguer M
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Oct; 27(4):367-75. PubMed ID: 23953584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selection of human blastocysts with a high implantation potential based on timely compaction.
    Mizobe Y; Ezono Y; Tokunaga M; Oya N; Iwakiri R; Yoshida N; Sato Y; Onoue N; Miyoshi K
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Aug; 34(8):991-997. PubMed ID: 28573523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of morphokinetics and morphological dynamics of cleavage stage on embryo developmental potential: A time-lapse study.
    Yang SH; Wu CH; Chen YC; Yang CK; Wu TH; Chen PC; Tsai HD
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 57(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 29458909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. External validation of a time-lapse prediction model.
    Fréour T; Le Fleuter N; Lammers J; Splingart C; Reignier A; Barrière P
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Apr; 103(4):917-22. PubMed ID: 25624197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.