These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24753926)

  • 1. Benchmarking and audit of breast units improves quality of care.
    van Dam PA; Verkinderen L; Hauspy J; Vermeulen P; Dirix L; Huizing M; Altintas S; Papadimitriou K; Peeters M; Tjalma W
    Facts Views Vis Obgyn; 2013; 5(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 24753926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time trends (2006-2015) of quality indicators in EUSOMA-certified breast centres.
    van Dam PA; Tomatis M; Marotti L; Heil J; Mansel RE; Rosselli Del Turco M; van Dam PJ; Casella D; Bassani LG; Danei M; Denk A; Egle D; Emons G; Friedrichs K; Harbeck N; Kiechle M; Kimmig R; Koehler U; Kuemmel S; Maass N; Mayr C; Prové A; Rageth C; Regolo L; Lorenz-Salehi F; Sarlos D; Singer C; Sohn C; Staelens G; Tinterri C; Audisio R; Ponti A;
    Eur J Cancer; 2017 Nov; 85():15-22. PubMed ID: 28881247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing the quality of breast cancer care at certified german breast centers: a benchmarking analysis for 2003-2009 with a particular focus on the interdisciplinary specialty of radiation oncology.
    Brucker SY; Wallwiener M; Kreienberg R; Jonat W; Beckmann MW; Bamberg M; Wallwiener D; Souchon R
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2011 Feb; 187(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 21267530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast cancer care and surgery in Australia and New Zealand: compliance of the BreastSurgANZ quality audit with international standards.
    Duffield JA; Blanch AJ; Bochner MA
    ANZ J Surg; 2023 Apr; 93(4):881-888. PubMed ID: 36856199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality indicators for evaluating trauma care: a scoping review.
    Stelfox HT; Bobranska-Artiuch B; Nathens A; Straus SE
    Arch Surg; 2010 Mar; 145(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 20231631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of EUSOMA certification on quality of breast cancer care.
    van Dam PA; Tomatis M; Marotti L; Heil J; Wilson R; Rosselli Del Turco M; Mayr C; Costa A; Danei M; Denk A; Emons G; Friedrichs K; Harbeck N; Kiechle M; Koheler U; Kuemmel S; Maass N; Marth C; Prové A; Kimmig R; Rageth C; Regolo L; Salehi L; Sarlos D; Singer C; Sohn C; Staelens G; Tinterri C; Ponti A; ;
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 41(10):1423-9. PubMed ID: 26278019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Establishing achievable benchmarks for quality improvement in systemic therapy for early-stage breast cancer.
    Powis M; Sutradhar R; Gonzalez A; Enright KA; Taback NA; Booth CM; Trudeau M; Krzyzanowska MK
    Cancer; 2017 Oct; 123(19):3772-3780. PubMed ID: 28678343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monitoring Breast Cancer Care Quality at National and Local Level Using the French National Cancer Cohort.
    Houzard S; Courtois E; Le Bihan Benjamin C; Erbault M; Arnould L; Barranger E; Coussy F; Couturaud B; Cutuli B; de Cremoux P; de Reilhac P; de Seze C; Foucaut AM; Gompel A; Honoré S; Lesur A; Mathelin C; Verzaux L; Bousquet PJ
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2022 Oct; 22(7):e832-e841. PubMed ID: 35750594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using QRRO survey data to assess compliance with quality indicators for breast and prostate cancer.
    Owen JB; White JR; Zelefsky MJ; Wilson JF
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Jun; 6(6):442-7. PubMed ID: 19467491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benchmarking the quality of breast cancer care in a nationwide voluntary system: the first five-year results (2003-2007) from Germany as a proof of concept.
    Brucker SY; Schumacher C; Sohn C; Rezai M; Bamberg M; Wallwiener D;
    BMC Cancer; 2008 Dec; 8():358. PubMed ID: 19055735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality indicators in breast cancer care: An update from the EUSOMA working group.
    Biganzoli L; Marotti L; Hart CD; Cataliotti L; Cutuli B; Kühn T; Mansel RE; Ponti A; Poortmans P; Regitnig P; van der Hage JA; Wengström Y; Rosselli Del Turco M
    Eur J Cancer; 2017 Nov; 86():59-81. PubMed ID: 28963914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adapting the HCUP QIs for hospital use: the experience in New York State.
    Jiang HJ; Ciccone K; Urlaub CJ; Boyd D; Meeks G; Horton L
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 2001 Apr; 27(4):200-15. PubMed ID: 11293837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality of care in breast cancer centers: results of benchmarking by the German Cancer Society and German Society for Breast Diseases.
    Kowalski C; Ferencz J; Brucker SY; Kreienberg R; Wesselmann S
    Breast; 2015 Apr; 24(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 25515645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mandatory national quality improvement systems using indicators: An initial assessment in Europe and Israel.
    Bramesfeld A; Wensing M; Bartels P; Bobzin H; Grenier C; Heugren M; Hirschfield DJ; Langenegger M; Lindelius B; Lucet B; Manor O; Schneider T; Wardell F; Szecsenyi J
    Health Policy; 2016 Nov; 120(11):1256-1269. PubMed ID: 27793361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality Indicators to Assure and Improve Cancer Care in Spain Using the Delphi Technique.
    Camps C; Albanell J; Antón A; Aranda E; Carrato A; Cassinello J; Castellano D; Cruz JJ; Garrido P; Guillem V; Grávalos C; López G; Llorente C; Lorenzo A; Lluch A; Ignacio E; Díaz-Rubio E
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2016 May; 14(5):553-8. PubMed ID: 27160233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A dynamic clinical pathway for the treatment of patients with early breast cancer is a tool for better cancer care: implementation and prospective analysis between 2002-2010.
    van Dam PA; Verheyden G; Sugihara A; Trinh XB; Van Der Mussele H; Wuyts H; Verkinderen L; Hauspy J; Vermeulen P; Dirix L
    World J Surg Oncol; 2013 Mar; 11():70. PubMed ID: 23497270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Benchmarking clinical practice quality: an audit of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in patients managed for T1/T2 breast carcinoma.
    Suttie C; Back M; Donovan J; Holecek M; Morgia M; Guo L; Lamoury G
    Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2016 Dec; 12(4):468-475. PubMed ID: 27521101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The development of a quality information system: a case study of Mexico.
    Durán-Arenas L; Cruz Rivero C; Fernández Canton S; Sánchez Rodríguez R; Franco F; Luna RW; Catino J
    Health Policy Plan; 1998 Dec; 13(4):446-58. PubMed ID: 10346036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Repeated measurements of generic indicators: a Danish national program to benchmark and improve quality of care.
    Qvist P; Rasmussen L; Bonnevie B; Gjørup T
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2004 Apr; 16(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 15051708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.